Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 6:04 pm
Thread Rating:
|
And, As Always, the Pentagon's Answer to This "Problem" is Mo' Money!
|
|
RE: And, As Always, the Pentagon's Answer to This "Problem" is Mo' Money!
July 21, 2017 at 12:50 pm
Holy shit we spend more on our military than the next 7 biggest spenders combined. These assholes want us to spend more.
Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk RE: And, As Always, the Pentagon's Answer to This "Problem" is Mo' Money!
July 21, 2017 at 1:49 pm
They always want more. That is the problem with the whole military-industrial complex.
RE: And, As Always, the Pentagon's Answer to This "Problem" is Mo' Money!
July 21, 2017 at 4:19 pm
(July 21, 2017 at 11:58 am)Minimalist Wrote: http://www.rawstory.com/2017/07/american...ce-report/ It's a shame they will never consider the other option, of simply letting the rest of the world behave as it wishes without the looming threat of "regime change". Another example of Maslow's Hammer. RE: And, As Always, the Pentagon's Answer to This "Problem" is Mo' Money!
July 21, 2017 at 4:21 pm
There is no profit in that, Thump.
Besides, when they retire the generals take lucrative jobs with defense contractors. The whole system is rotten to the core. RE: And, As Always, the Pentagon's Answer to This "Problem" is Mo' Money!
July 21, 2017 at 5:00 pm
(July 21, 2017 at 4:21 pm)Minimalist Wrote: There is no profit in that, Thump. I bet there could be plenty of profit in building, say, a green energy infrastructure instead of jet engines -- GE or P&W might like that. I agree that the system itself is a rig. Whether or not one agrees with his politics, Ike was dead-on in his warning about the dangers of the MIC. RE: And, As Always, the Pentagon's Answer to This "Problem" is Mo' Money!
July 21, 2017 at 5:06 pm
Quote:I bet there could be plenty of profit in building, say, a green energy infrastructure instead of jet engines -- GE or P&W might like that. But would the Pentagon? RE: And, As Always, the Pentagon's Answer to This "Problem" is Mo' Money!
July 21, 2017 at 7:22 pm
(July 21, 2017 at 5:06 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:I bet there could be plenty of profit in building, say, a green energy infrastructure instead of jet engines -- GE or P&W might like that. Bureaucrats gonna bureaucrat ... and the Pentagon is literally in the business of fighting over turf. RE: And, As Always, the Pentagon's Answer to This "Problem" is Mo' Money!
July 23, 2017 at 8:47 pm
we're going to be like the Roman empire... fucking sad..
hopefully the Canadians from the north just start rolling all the down casually i wouldn't mind being in south east Canada. At least we would get free healthcare.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>RE: And, As Always, the Pentagon's Answer to This "Problem" is Mo' Money!
July 24, 2017 at 12:54 pm
The grim fact is were just waiting for you guys to implode so we can pick up the pieces
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


