White supremacists and counter protesters clash in Charlottesville

[Anomalocaris]

Funny how the more strident the christer, the more he side with the Nazis.

[The Grand Nudger]

Funny like dick cancer.  

[Drich]

Usually I stay out of these conversations, but I've been prompted to say something.

I'll state this and leave you out of it because, frankly, I don't want to get dragged into it any more than I have to.

But here's an outsider's perspective of what I've seen, and what I've read here:

The statement was made here, "How many shots were fired?" (paraphrased, of course).

Is this question truly relevant?

because most of you snowflakes are too G-Dstupid to know the difference between carrying a gun and people using guns on other people. So I asked the question, to divide intent from action and to further divid purpose from your suspected intent... watch i will do it again and make you look like a fool who does not know the difference between open carry laws and killing someone:

After all, the intent of carrying semi-automatic weapons and dressing like some militia is specifically, in this instance, to intimidate those around them (and often to boost the egos of those carrying the weapons).  And to me, at least, it seems that if you're going to carry loaded weapons with live rounds (and, again, we don't know how many did this) means you are prepared to use them.

Again in your little world is it not feasible that some ultra crazy lefty would ever wish harm on a kkk member? let's just say given all the protest leftists had last year a few member decided to open carry as per state regulation allowed. why? maybe they did not feel like the police would jump infront of any bullets some of the alt left nut jobs like to shoot into crowds so they decided to protect themselves and their loved ones.. as a result of their dicipline even though they were hated and hated others not one shot fired in either direction no CVS or any other business got burned. That is why they carried guns to not let their civil discord erupt into the crap we are use to seeing when when non white supremacists riot.

And having a president who is all but openly condoning this behaviour is giving these groups all the approval they need to get worse.

how many of these riots under obama??? This is the first one under trump. grow some perspective and honesty.. or are you saying obama did nothing to prevent these riots where billions of dollars was damaged and 100s of lives lost. what a gross and dishonest appraisal of anyone's work record let alone a first instance of the current administration.

 We've already seen an upswing in anti-Semitic and racist sentiment across the country from Trump's supporters since he was elected.

citation, as that is an out right lie. Trump has 110% of the support of israel and they have our support Obama spent state money and a negative add campaign against nettenyahoo, not to mention left israel out to dry with it's enemys. Israel HATED obama and could not be more happy with trump... where do you get your bs???

Yes, one coward used a car to injure and kill a number of counter protestors.  How much escalation will it take for the supporters and apologists for these groups to stop their support, or for the authorities to stamp down on them?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjqhnSf0l-Q
You tell me.

Would it take a group of them actually opening fire on a counter protest?

Idiot, I am not for one or the other but pointing out biggotry on both sides. I like trump condemn the biggorty no matter which side it comes from.

[The Grand Nudger]

You, like trump, offer tepid excuses for nazis...because you, like trump, are a nazi sympathizer.

You know, I almost thought that there couldn't be such a thing, what with nazism having been eradicated 70 years ago by our own hands...but here you and trump and your Challenger Volks-Brigade are.

[Minimalist]

Just one question if you are a bigot who hates bigots... what makes you better?

The fact that YOU are a fucking bigot. 

I'm sorry you can't grasp the concept but, after all, you are a guy who believes a dead jew came back to life for your fucking sins and then flew up to heaven.  I doubt you can understand much.

[Drich]

hey, retard vol.2

How many people were shot at this rally???? Think for yourself moron, if no one was shot how many times was a gun discharged??? google it... 0 times both accounts. now how many head injuries? 30+ why? bad people on both sides bought club shield mace to hurt people who do not think the way they do.

That is bigotry, not what you think about a statue or what you think about white or black people. bigotry is bring a club to smash someone's head in because they do not think the same way about something you do.. Does not matter what that something is, it's your wicked heart that justifies you bring a bat to a protest.

Again doesn't matter which side of the protest you are on. You are evil for bring the bat, shield, helmet, mace, and tazer to a protest you feel strongly about.

Remember the whole free speech thing? it's not just to protect popular speech. It's primary purpose is to protect anti government unpopular speech. Why?? because our forefather's knew what an unhappy minority would do if left unchecked long enough

  

As soon as you bring a weapon to a rally your intentions are clear that all you want is war. If you don't have the courage to fight without one, your just as bad a Trump supporter. If you are to stupid to fight a social issue without a firearm, you need to stay home and let the adults in the room handle it. Armed conflict has always been last resort option, now if they do want to repair themselves and their group reputations(if your able to find any silver lining in supporting a racist movement) It would start with a public apologizes and some lines about condemning the actions that some of your groups undertook upon others who opposed them.

That is what you said...
Then you say:

 

No one said anything about firearms being discharged, we were talking about how weapons were present at the rally.

but you did, or do you not understand the word war???

War=killing people on mass scale.

So your broken logic says I bring a gun I want to kill people, then you follow up by saying "if you need a fire arm to fight a social issue... Armed conflict is always..." again maybe you do not understand the words you use and or what they mean.  Need a fire arm to fight=discharging a firearm. there is only one way to use a firearm (lest it becomes a club which again was brought by the alt lefters as well) and that is to discharge the fire arm

Armed conflict refers to the discharge of firearms.

So then I pointed out not one round was discharged let alone anyone shot. why? because you seem to be too stupid to discern the lawful open carry of a fire arm in that state and someone shooting someone with a gun. I simply pointed out there is a huge difference between legal open carry and killing someone or even discharging said gun...

How many alt left protests can boast no firearms discharged no property damage? It was because everyone had a gun/those who did were law abiding gun owners, and as such kept the situation from getting completely out of control.

[The Grand Nudger]

How many alt left protests can boast no firearms discharged no property damage? It was because everyone had a gun/those who did were law abiding gun owners, and as such kept the situation from getting completely out of control.

Or maybe it;s because "leftists" don't bring guns to their "protests", like your alt right heroes, genius.  Here's to hoping it never has to come to that, that you and your merry band of helpful werewolves just give the fuck up in the face of inexorable change.

You, of all fucking people...lol? You're on the alt rights list of undesirables, Drich. I think you need to let that sink in. Boy, you aint white.

[The Valkyrie]

Usually I stay out of these conversations, but I've been prompted to say something.

I'll state this and leave you out of it because, frankly, I don't want to get dragged into it any more than I have to.

But here's an outsider's perspective of what I've seen, and what I've read here:

The statement was made here, "How many shots were fired?" (paraphrased, of course).

Is this question truly relevant?

because most of you snowflakes are too G-Dstupid to know the difference between carrying a gun and people using guns on other people. So I asked the question, to divide intent from action and to further divid purpose from your suspected intent... watch i will do it again and make you look like a fool who does not know the difference between open carry laws and killing someone:

After all, the intent of carrying semi-automatic weapons and dressing like some militia is specifically, in this instance, to intimidate those around them (and often to boost the egos of those carrying the weapons).  And to me, at least, it seems that if you're going to carry loaded weapons with live rounds (and, again, we don't know how many did this) means you are prepared to use them.

Again in your little world is it not feasible that some ultra crazy lefty would ever wish harm on a kkk member? let's just say given all the protest leftists had last year a few member decided to open carry as per state regulation allowed. why? maybe they did not feel like the police would jump infront of any bullets some of the alt left nut jobs like to shoot into crowds so they decided to protect themselves and their loved ones.. as a result of their dicipline even though they were hated and hated others not one shot fired in either direction no CVS or any other business got burned. That is why they carried guns to not let their civil discord erupt into the crap we are use to seeing when when non white supremacists riot.

And having a president who is all but openly condoning this behaviour is giving these groups all the approval they need to get worse.

how many of these riots under obama??? This is the first one under trump. grow some perspective and honesty.. or are you saying obama did nothing to prevent these riots where billions of dollars was damaged and 100s of lives lost. what a gross and dishonest appraisal of anyone's work record let alone a first instance of the current administration.

 We've already seen an upswing in anti-Semitic and racist sentiment across the country from Trump's supporters since he was elected.

citation, as that is an out right lie. Trump has 110% of the support of israel and they have our support Obama spent state money and a negative add campaign against nettenyahoo, not to mention left israel out to dry with it's enemys. Israel HATED obama and could not be more happy with trump... where do you get your bs???

Yes, one coward used a car to injure and kill a number of counter protestors.  How much escalation will it take for the supporters and apologists for these groups to stop their support, or for the authorities to stamp down on them?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjqhnSf0l-Q
You tell me.

Would it take a group of them actually opening fire on a counter protest?

Idiot, I am not for one or the other but pointing out biggotry on both sides. I like trump condemn the biggorty no matter which side it comes from.

SO, I carefully word my questions and my points and you respond with bullshit and insults?

No, I won't address your claims.

I'll just say, go fuck yourself you arrogant cunt.

[Sterben]

  

As soon as you bring a weapon to a rally your intentions are clear that all you want is war. If you don't have the courage to fight without one, your just as bad a Trump supporter. If you are to stupid to fight a social issue without a firearm, you need to stay home and let the adults in the room handle it. Armed conflict has always been last resort option, now if they do want to repair themselves and their group reputations(if your able to find any silver lining in supporting a racist movement) It would start with a public apologizes and some lines about condemning the actions that some of your groups undertook upon others who opposed them.

That is what you said...
Then you say:

 

No one said anything about firearms being discharged, we were talking about how weapons were present at the rally.

but you did, or do you not understand the word war???

War=killing people on mass scale.

So your broken logic says I bring a gun I want to kill people, then you follow up by saying "if you need a fire arm to fight a social issue... Armed conflict is always..." again maybe you do not understand the words you use and or what they mean.  Need a fire arm to fight=discharging a firearm. there is only one way to use a firearm (lest it becomes a club which again was brought by the alt lefters as well) and that is to discharge the fire arm

Armed conflict refers to the discharge of firearms.

So then I pointed out not one round was discharged let alone anyone shot. why? because you seem to be too stupid to discern the lawful open carry of a fire arm in that state and someone shooting someone with a gun. I simply pointed out there is a huge difference between legal open carry and killing someone or even discharging said gun...

How many alt left protests can boast no firearms discharged no property damage? It was because everyone had a gun/those who did were law abiding gun owners, and as such kept the situation from getting completely out of control.

     I understand perfectly, my point being that if your bringing up firearms to a rally. You may resort to using them, I did not state that that anyone was shot nor did any one else here. It's the fact that the this racist rally had armed people involved. My second point being, potential use of fire arms being a probability not a fact in this case. Did anyone say that there were gunshots fired at any protesters?

[The Grand Nudger]

I find it more damning that no shots were fired at the terrorist who plowed into americans. All of those "patriots" with guns...fucking useless.