Religion and Science are 1000% Opposite

[Succubus]

Well, well, well.  

This come from the guy who did not read my link that would answer his question about the not Christian historians and then ask the same question once again.

Mental defective or troll, which is it? And yes, I'm aware the terms aren’t mutually exclusive

[I_am_not_mafia]

Maybe Little Prik should tell us what he would consider evidence before demanding it.

[Little Rik]

Maybe Little Prik should tell us what he would consider evidence before demanding it.

That is absolutely bizarre Mat considering that peer review was asked by YOU you you you when I said something.
What a short memory Mat!
So now you don't know anymore what evidence is all about, isn't it Mat.

Of course there are other types of evidence Mat.
Suppose you die in a car accident (touch iron) and you realize that you (your consciousness) separate from your dead body so you never die in reality.

That is also evidence Mat but if you would revive again as in a NDE and come here to tell us
your friends atheists still would not believe so let us stick with peer review then.

Ok?
Now let me see any peer review that say that the consciousness is a product of the brain or that the consciousness die.
If you are unable to do so then I have to conclude that you are full of bull.

One more thing Mat.
If you think that calling names will help you to get out your mental problem then forget it.
Not only doesn't work but lower you deeper in the gutter.

One more tip Mat.
Get more knowledge before you spout more garbage.  

Here is one interesting link.

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014...ver-of-it/

[causal code]

Found a nice meme to describe OP:

[Cyberman]

That is also evidence Mat but if you would revive again as in a NDE and come here to tell us
your friends atheists still would not believe so let us stick with peer review then.

Let's get past that 'if' first, before we talk about believing or not. Because I guarantee you've never had an NDE, nor ever met and spoke to anyone who claims they did. All you've ever done is read stories about these things. I'm impressed that you can read, it's a fine achievement, but that's as far as it goes.

[Little Rik]

That is also evidence Mat but if you would revive again as in a NDE and come here to tell us
your friends atheists still would not believe so let us stick with peer review then.

Let's get past that 'if' first, before we talk about believing or not. Because I guarantee you've never had an NDE, nor ever met and spoke to anyone who claims they did. All you've ever done is read stories about these things. I'm impressed that you can read, it's a fine achievement, but that's as far as it goes.

I don't think Cyb you know how the detective work works.

You start with what you got.
It doesn't really matter if what you got is little.
Piece after piece you build the mosaic that give you a clear image.

Is true that I never had an NDE but I am very very lucky because I got what is needed to get all pieces that build the image that give evidence to the fact that we never die and God is real.

The evidence is within Cyb so by working within you will sooner or later come up with who you really are.
Outside and externally there is nothing but an illusion that is why atheists, materialists and religious fanatics
get nowhere.
NDEs match exactly what you can discover working on your subconscious.
The two experiences go hand in hand that is why you can't go wrong.
If you also put the teaching of Shiva, Krishna, Buddha and Christ that say the same thing then you are 100% sure that you are correct.  

[I_am_not_mafia]

Well I am due to undergo an operation in the next 8 - 12 weeks under general anesthetic. I've had it before so I know that I will be unconscious at the time because of what will be done to my physical brain.

But of course Little Prik ignores all the documented and peer reviewed evidence about anesthesia and why and how it works. Or for the effects of neuro-degenerative diseases or narcotic drugs for that matter.

[Little Rik]

Well I am due to undergo an operation in the next 8 - 12 weeks under general anesthetic. I've had it before so I know that I will be unconscious at the time because of what will be done to my physical brain.

But of course Little Prik ignores all the documented and peer reviewed evidence about anesthesia and why and how it works. Or for the effects of neuro-degenerative diseases or narcotic drugs for that matter.

And the point you try to make is.........?  

To me it seems that you are under mental anesthetic right now?  

[Cyberman]

We're back to intuition again? We're really doing this?

[I_am_not_mafia]

Well I am due to undergo an operation in the next 8 - 12 weeks under general anesthetic. I've had it before so I know that I will be unconscious at the time because of what will be done to my physical brain.

But of course Little Prik ignores all the documented and peer reviewed evidence about anesthesia and why and how it works. Or for the effects of neuro-degenerative diseases or narcotic drugs for that matter.

And the point you try to make is.........?  

To me it seems that you are under mental anesthetic right now?  

Well I don't have my sock puppets or crayons handy so unfortunately I shall have to rely on just words to explain it to you.

If consciousness was not a function of the physical brain then anesthesia would not work at all.

Here is some peer reviewed evidence for you (unfortunately it also uses words).

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2743249/

How consciousness arises in the brain remains unknown. Yet, for nearly two centuries our ignorance has not hampered the use of general anesthesia for routinely extinguishing consciousness during surgery. Unfortunately, once in every 1000–2000 operations a patient may temporarily regain consciousness or even remain conscious during surgery