Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 2:59 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Not religious doesn't necessarily mean atheist
#21
RE: Not religious doesn't necessarily mean atheist
(November 1, 2017 at 1:58 pm)alpha male Wrote:
(November 1, 2017 at 1:11 pm)Lutrinae Wrote: From my perspective, ditching one irrational belief system for another is not conducive to rational thought or critical thinking processes, meaning that witchcraft is no more representative of reality than christianity.

Yeah, that's the point. Atheists here get excited about reports that people are becoming less religious, but that doesn't mean all such people are becoming like them. Many are just exchanging one thing you reject for another thing you reject.

Read the bolded folks. Yes, atheists can believe in astrology, but we don't get a lot like that here, do we?
Reply
#22
RE: Not religious doesn't necessarily mean atheist
Yeah atheists are cunts.

like Americans.
Reply
#23
RE: Not religious doesn't necessarily mean atheist
(November 1, 2017 at 3:49 pm)alpha male Wrote: Read the bolded folks. Yes, atheists can believe in astrology, but we don't get a lot like that here, do we?

Maybe you should haunt an astrology board, if you're looking for astrologers? If people believe in god less, then people are becoming "like us" in the only sense that makes any sense with regards to atheism.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#24
RE: Not religious doesn't necessarily mean atheist
@OP

Really? No shit.

TIL
Reply
#25
RE: Not religious doesn't necessarily mean atheist
Tuned in to a brief bit of The Jesus Christ Show recently (IANMTU) and Neil Saavedra (portraying your Holy Host, Jesus Christ) was talking about people who believe in atheism.

Unfortunately, only got a little bit of the show, and on previous occasions when I've listened I haven't been too impressed.

But, oh my goodness gracious, that phrase: "people who believe in atheism", Jesus fucking Christ, what a howler !!

ROFLOL
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
#26
RE: Not religious doesn't necessarily mean atheist
(November 1, 2017 at 3:16 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: I mean...astrology isn't a religion.  It (and other pseudoscience crap) is certainly a delusion, but it's not a religion anymore than being anti-vax or anti-evolution is.  And atheists can certainly be astrology believers, the two aren't at all mutually exclusive.

I would say that if it is not religion then it is so close to religion that you could barely squeeze a Rizla between the two. To use astrology, from whence did it come? The Babylonian religion, specifically it was the way in which the priests of Babylon and its antecedent empires decided as to what messages their gods gave them, how they persuaded the common people to bow down and worship (and incidentally give the priests half their produce so that the priests could better read the stars). Witchcraft or wicca similarly can trace its roots as a bastardised version of the old Celtic pagan traditions and religions, retaining what few remnants were left of that religious tradition after the Romans, and later christians, were through with dismantling it.

If you look hard at all these new age spiritualisms you either see a harking back to the old folk religions, or a scam artist trying to create a new religion in order to profit, or most often both.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli

Home
Reply
#27
RE: Not religious doesn't necessarily mean atheist
It's true. Non religious does not necessarily mean atheist. There are Buddhists that are very religious and yet don't believe in or worship any gods. But they still believe in supernatural bullshit like full blown literal karma and reincarnation.

The way I see it religious=you believe in something supernatural and follow it as your 'religion'. Most, but not all religions have gods.

Non-theist however... does necessarily mean atheist.

This is nothing new and I don't see the point of the OP. The dictionaries agree with this. It's nothing new or interesting.


EDIT: Wait, I got this backwards. Religious doesn't necessarily mean theist. Non-religious absolutely does mean atheistic because non-religious means not believing in anything supernatural including gods. What the fuck are you talking about OP?

Oh, unless you're including deism. Like I guess you could be a deist without really being religious. Or a pantheist without really being religious. But the OP example is about pseudo-science and woo, which is irrational cultish and like religion . . . but it's not technically religious. Because 'pseudo-scientifi'c and 'paranormal' is different to 'supernatural'. At least paranormal and pseudo-scientific nonsense doesn't claim to be outside of nature. It's supposed to just be 'ooooh spooky shit'. But not outside of nature.

(November 1, 2017 at 1:21 pm)Harry Nevis Wrote:
(November 1, 2017 at 1:11 pm)Lutrinae Wrote: From my perspective, ditching one irrational belief system for another is not conducive to rational thought or critical thinking processes, meaning that witchcraft is no more representative of reality than christianity.

But there is much more evidence for witches then for Jesus.

Actually there's the exact same non-number. (zero isn't a number).

(November 1, 2017 at 2:46 pm)Khemikal Wrote: This is why wicca never succeeds or fails as a cultural phenomena[...]

I cannot grasp the concept of something never succeeding nor failing when failure itself is the absence of success Tongue

And if absence of success is not a failure, then your inaction is a success Tongue

It's why I'm so lazy all the time. I need to actually figure out a worthy goal I'd deem to be desirable and worth achieving before I can have a meaningful sense of ambition. Ambitiousness is a strong motivated desire for success but if I have no goals I already have what I want, which is nothing, thereby I am a success by default. I can't be a failure if I have no goals to fail to achieve Tongue Because ultimately failure is a lack of success, not an absence of success, so success can be an absence of a lack of success by default Tongue
Reply
#28
RE: Not religious doesn't necessarily mean atheist
Actually hammy, there is conclusive evidence that witches exist. Many practitioners of wicca and other religions are witches, the same way a follower of Christ is a Christian.

What there is no evidence for is witchcraft.
“Eternity is a terrible thought. I mean, where's it going to end?” 
― Tom StoppardRosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
Reply
#29
RE: Not religious doesn't necessarily mean atheist
(November 2, 2017 at 1:40 am)Hammy Wrote: I cannot grasp the concept of something never succeeding nor failing when failure itself is the absence of success Tongue

And if absence of success is not a failure, then your inaction is a success Tongue

It's why I'm so lazy all the time. I need to actually figure out a worthy goal I'd deem to be desirable and worth achieving before I can have a meaningful sense of ambition. Ambitiousness is a strong motivated desire for success but if I have no goals I already have what I want, which is nothing, thereby I am a success by default. I can't be a failure if I have no goals to fail to achieve Tongue Because ultimately failure is a lack of success, not an absence of success, so success can be an absence of a lack of success by default Tongue

Not in a religious economy.  Think of it this way; they aren't going out of business, but they aren't turning a profit either.  Wicca doesn't appeal to the sort of consumer required (or appeal in the manner required) for the profligate growth of what we consider a mainstream religion.  It's chokey.  For example, between the 90's and the 10's, as it matured in the american market space, it began to coalesce around a loose but singular message (this is one of the factors that, as we understand it, helps a religion to grow - consolidation)..and by the numbers it was an up and comer with what seemed to be the fastest rate of conversion of any american religion..if you ignored the actual numbers and possible errors in reporting.  From roughly 8k to 140k ish.  Not alot of people..and significant number of them probably didn't convert, just "came out of the broom closet" as it were.  

The kindest appraisal would classify wicca as a local frozen yogurt shop competing with global brands.  The global brands, for their part, encroach on the small local shops market space with ease.  Christo-paganism is a thing.  It appeals to the same consumer that wicca appeals to, but maintains the traditional iconography and even cultural support that the adherent is accustomed to.  The larger the buddy jesus camp becomes, the more of the available space for wicca is consumed.  It's in a precarious spot, where it only exists in the receding margins.  

For a religion, that's not success, at best it's survival, at worst a slow death.  

@Witchraft.  
Most adult wiccans have a modified belief/position on witchcraft, just as they have a modified position on gods.  They take it to be effective, but not necessarily for reasons of magic.  They're ritualists, as I mentioned before.  The value of witchcraft is explicable beyond some force that makes people love you, just as the value of focal divinity is explicable beyond the literal existence of gods.  In the strictest sense, the wiccans who believe in literal magic and literal gods are generally adolescent or in transition from christianity - and beyond that...a minority.  As they get older, and as they shed their christian underpinnings, their wicca comes to resemble a concept of utilitarian metaphor.  They draw down the godhead in a personalized ceremony not so much because they believe they are being possessed by a god, but because the ritual focuses and grounds them.  Witchcraft becomes an exercise in goal orientation.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#30
RE: Not religious doesn't necessarily mean atheist
(November 1, 2017 at 1:58 pm)alpha male Wrote:
(November 1, 2017 at 1:11 pm)Lutrinae Wrote: From my perspective, ditching one irrational belief system for another is not conducive to rational thought or critical thinking processes, meaning that witchcraft is no more representative of reality than christianity.

Yeah, that's the point. Atheists here get excited about reports that people are becoming less religious, but that doesn't mean all such people are becoming like them. Many are just exchanging one thing you reject for another thing you reject.

But the important is those people are spitting on what YOU accept, as they should, even if they accept something else they shouldn’t.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  What does Sam Harris mean by saying that religions are failed sciences? FlatAssembler 18 910 January 23, 2024 at 1:32 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Why God doesn't stop satan? purplepurpose 225 14145 June 28, 2021 at 1:52 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  How can you be sure that God doesn't exist? randomguy123 50 5616 August 14, 2019 at 10:46 pm
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Having religious friends when you're atheist Bahana 15 2581 March 10, 2019 at 1:37 am
Last Post: fredd bear
  Do you know that homeopathy doesn't work, or do you just lack belief that it does? I_am_not_mafia 24 5092 August 25, 2018 at 4:34 am
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Being An Atheist Doesn't Make You A Good Person mlmooney89 38 6921 September 7, 2017 at 10:29 am
Last Post: drfuzzy
  Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! Whateverist 123 36933 May 15, 2017 at 9:05 am
Last Post: Whateverist
  A god who doesn't believe in himself? ErikB 6 1684 January 21, 2017 at 2:06 pm
Last Post: ErikB
  Amos Yee : Atheist arrested twice for "intention to wound religious feelings" Incognito 20 6801 January 14, 2017 at 8:45 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  "God doesn't Exist"- Claim or Conclusion RiddledWithFear 105 17626 December 28, 2016 at 4:28 pm
Last Post: Mister Agenda



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)