Seriously, referencing people who aren't even known to be credible in the area they're choosing to "criticize" is fucking moronic.
Credible.
Credible.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 27, 2024, 6:26 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Young-Earth-Creationism - can you prove it's not true?
|
 (November 3, 2010 at 12:33 pm)theophilus Wrote: How do you know it hasn't been peer reviewed and if it hasn't what difference would that make? I think this post gets the award for the most amusing and ignorant post of the year!
A finite number of monkeys with a finite number of typewriters and a finite amount of time could eventually reproduce 4chan.
It's complete hogwash.
Ever notice how it is only creationist shitheads who have a problem with this stuff?
Do you think they might have an "agenda?" 
http://creation.com/diamonds-a-creationists-best-friend
Is this true? If not, can you prove it with a link or something? RE: Young-Earth-Creationism - can you prove it's not true?
November 4, 2010 at 5:05 pm
(This post was last modified: November 4, 2010 at 5:10 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(November 4, 2010 at 4:42 pm)cookies4life Wrote: http://creation.com/diamonds-a-creationists-best-friend What garbage, and creationists wonder why no professional journal would accept their crap. Radio active carbon dating calculates the time since the organism to whom the carbon belonged has last carried out respiration , an act which equilibrates the ratio of C12 and C14 inside the organism with the ratio of these isotops in the atmosphere and sets the initial condition for C14 decay. Diamond formed in the mantle of the earth 200 KM deep, as this so called "geophycist" aknowledges but is utterly unable to grasp the implications of. This implication is the carbon from which the diamonds were made probably didn't come from a surface organism that had breathed the atmosphere. So there was never any initial equilibration of the C14 and C12 with those of the atmosphere. So to use radioactive C14 method to actually date a diamond is utter bullshit. It's like reading time by how much sand is left in the upper half of the hour glass without knowing how much sand was there in the first place, nor how much sand has been added to the upper half after it was turned over. You should be insulted that they actually expected you to buy this crap. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_dating
They hate facts, Chuck. Hate 'em!
 Quote:I think Theo is under the mistaken impression that evolution and creationism are equivalent theories. How dare you! Quote:In practice, evolution is neither fact nor theory.http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-answ...-evolution
Its ok to have doubt, just dont let that doubt become the answers.
You dont hate God, you hate the church game. "God is not what you imagine or what you think you understand. If you understand you have failed." Saint Augustine Your mind works very simply: you are either trying to find out what are God's laws in order to follow them; or you are trying to outsmart Him. -Martin H. Fischer |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
