How atheist are you?

[Catholic_Lady]

I'm a two I suppose.

There's always a chance the atheists are right, though I don't think that's the case.

[Minimalist]

7.1 +

[Edwardo Piet]

I'm a 7 about many gods, and a 6 about a few gods.

---

Is it wonder woman's pussy?

Nah. It's excited pussies in general.

I definitely believe in that god

I'm a pussy worshiper. Screw the idea of God as a dude. What a penis.

---

6.9999

I think you don't understand the scale lol.

---

I find it funny that you guys add decimal places to a pure integer scale

Exactly.

---

Is this some kind of popularity contest? No thanks, had enough of that in high school.

wut

This isn't a popularity scale.

---

I don't understand what his point was of making this scale in the first place. Why the need to "measure" disbelief in something you find as silly as Santa Clause?

For the same reason that Dawkins felt the need to write his book that the scale is resided in.

Belief in God is fucking silly... and yet the majority of people accept that silliness, and it's a silliness that can have negative consequences.

Although yeah, I'm personally bored of it. But I'm also the kind of guy who says what he thinks even when there's no good reason to say it.

I just think aloud, you know? That's me. I see this thread and I answer it.

[ignoramus]

The much more interesting and more well-defined question is whether there is a meaningful afterlife. Put me down with a 6.99 on the no side based on the evidence. God is too ill defined a thing to say something concrete about.

Is the. 01% your escape clause?

I don't think I need an escape clause. If he can read my mind, I'm a dead man walking...

[Whateverist]

I’d say I’m a 5 and 1/2

I do not know whether God exists but I operate under the assumption that he doesn’t.

Interesting, I don't recall the 5 and 6 being defined as they are in the OP.  I don't see an important difference and could just as easily choose either or 5.5 as you did.

[ignoramus]

Mark, as atheists, I think the 5 and 6 are differentiated by how hard you laugh at Lik's posts...

[vorlon13]

Lessee:

I wanna sell inflatable baby Jesus love dolls to horny pedophile priests,

I wanna do double entry fucking of Jesus nail holes with Brett Favre

And I commissioned an Atheist Forum logo contender portraying the elephant of atheism proclaiming as much by trumpeting his trunk while it was stuck in Jesus butthole.

---

---

So I'm either at negative or positive 100 on the graph

[Whateverist]

6.9999

I think you don't understand the scale lol.

---

I find it funny that you guys add decimal places to a pure integer scale

Exactly.

I'd like to revise my answer to 6.17 +or– 0.38. That ought to get it done ... FINAL ANSWER!!!

[Succubus]

It's perfectly simple. If this god incorporates any aspect of teh supernatural then it doesn't exist. Supernatural = magic, magic isn't real. You can't walk on water unless its frozen and you can't turn two loves of bread into five thousand fish, or whatever it was.  If you've been dead for three days you're staying fucking dead!

Carroll says no.

[AFTT47]

I'm a 6 regarding the existence of A God of any kind and a 7 regarding all the claims I have heard of a specific God.

I think it's unfortunate that so many people poo poo this poll. Labels are indeed imprecise and sometimes a pain in the ass but they are a useful tool. I told everybody my rating on Dawkin's scale. That is definitely inadequate if you want to know who the hell AFTT47 is but it's a useful indicator if you want to start a conversation with me concerning the existence/non-existence of generic or specific God/gods. You don't really know me much better but you do have a foundation upon which to build a conversation that you didn't have before.