A problem with the word "atheist"

[Whateverist]

I don't need to.  Reality itself contradicts what you call 'reality'.

Reality only contradict your fantasies.  
A doctor that study at the uni for 5, 6 or 7 years knows whether the person is alive or dead and also knows that a dead brain can not possibly put together any clear and sharp experiences.
Atheists problem is that they find impossible to say..........we were wrong......wrong all the way.
In other words atheists refuse to admit that they were mentally bankrupt.  

Interesting.  Our best hope of insight into others is our insight regarding how we ourselves operate.

[Cinjin]

Something doesn't have to be real for me to hate it.

Santa Clause isn't real and I fucking hate that fat bastard.


Yahweh is a fraud. I hate that fake god too.

[Fake Messiah]

In the meantime you should know that nobody ever said that anyone who die and then come back to life had to have an NDE.
Right?
If you would have read my old post about the NDEs you would have understood that is quite natural that a real NDE experience with God can not possibly be given to anyone.

What? So does that mean you will never become a necronaut? Let me guess you're also not worthy of god showing you NDE? Because you could find a doctor to put you into clinical death and you could step into that other world, explore it and then tell us all about it.

But of course there is always an excuse why people can't explore it and what you're doing is nothing new it's called ad hoc hypothesis. It is quite common in paranormal research and in the work of pseudo scientists. What people like you do is constantly create new hypothesis to explain away facts that seem to refute your belief or theory. Like ESP researchers have been known to blame the hostile thoughts of onlookers for unconsciously influencing pointer readings on sensitive instruments. "The hostile vibes", they say, made it impossible for them to duplicate a positive ESP experiment. Being able to duplicate an experiment is essential to confirming its validity. Of course, if this objection is taken seriously, then no experiment on ESP can ever fail.

So you just keep inventing bullshit excuses and in the meantime Ricky has a message for you:

[Cyberman]

If you would have read my old post about the NDEs you would have understood that is quite natural that a real NDE experience with God can not possibly be given to anyone.

Finally, something on which we agree.

[The Grand Nudger]

Nine pages in, the "problem" with the word atheist is still religious dipshits.

[Thumpalumpacus]

I've never catered to the opinions of strangers before ... I see no reason to begin doing so now.

[Huggy Bear]

There's just one problem, you can't say for certain that God doesn't exist so if in fact God does exist the you become the epitome of a "dumbf*ck".

Name one good reason to believe god does exist.

My purpose isn't to convince you of anything, nor would I want to, my purpose here is to counter nonsensical arguments.

Ultimately it's up you to find out for yourself if God exists, as long as you can say you sincerely searched for an answer to that question and can say without any doubts that God doesn't exist... I'm cool with that, Just don't go to your grave with something as weak as "I don't know".

[LadyForCamus]

Name one good reason to believe god does exist.

My purpose isn't to convince you of anything, nor would I want to, my purpose here is to counter nonsensical arguments.

Really?  Because I’ve never seen you counter even one of the hundred or so fallacious arguments trotted out here daily by your fellow theists.  So, you don’t feel you have any responsibility at all to foster a positive argument for your position, but you think we are responsible for counter-arguments?  How does that work exactly?

Ultimately it's up you to find out for yourself if God exists, as long as you can say you sincerely searched for an answer to that question and can say without any doubts that God doesn't exist... I'm cool with that, Just don't go to your grave with something as weak as "I don't know".

It’s not that hard, really.  There is no evidence for any god, therefore I have no rational reason to believe one exists.  Two years at this forum, and I haven’t been presented with even a meager shred of evidence to make me to think otherwise. If a Theist can come to me with something, I’m all ears.

[I_am_not_mafia]

as long as you can say you sincerely searched for an answer to that question and can say without any doubts that God doesn't exist... I'm cool with that, Just don't go to your grave with something as weak as "I don't know".

I can say without any doubt that God does not exist. As much as I can say that Santa Claus, the tooth fairy and the easter bunny don't exist.

Less sure about the underpants gnomes though.

[Thumpalumpacus]

Name one good reason to believe god does exist.

My purpose isn't to convince you of anything, nor would I want to, my purpose here is to counter nonsensical arguments.

I'm thinking there are more fertile fields for this purpose of yours. That whole mote/beam thing comes to mind.