Objective/subjective morals

[Jeezypete]

I only believe objective morals can exist with the existence of god otherwise everything is subjective, so this is where the atheist is screwed. 9/11, the three standard perceptions you can have with the moral compass and lack therof is 1. Evil action. 2. just a action(good and evil doesn't exist) 3. good action. Whichever one you pick for your subjective truth there is still two delusions that you're subjectivelyperceiving on a subconscious level. When bypassing the usa law and going straight to the theory there is no chief in command to dictate the absolute answer so all 3 of these perceptions(even though they cancel each other out) are valid with the theory for the individual that wants to perceive it differently than you. All 3 of these perceptions are impossible to be wrong with the theory but you're perceiving two of the answers as delusions so this is a contradiction within itself. If there are two delusion that are compatible with your theory then it means you don't even believe the theory is 100% truthful 100% factual on subconscious levels. That's whats behind the atheist mask of fact, logic, reason, science, intelligence,.They are all sitting on a subjective truth accompanied by two subjective delusion on a subconscious level which means they don't even believe it, It's all a mask to deny god while playing dumb that god doesn't exist.

Just because anybody can’t really agree on how morals work doesn’t prove or disprove god. Morals exist, we understand them as part of a human condition, and yes they are partially relative to the experience. To deny this is to deny any difference from person to person. Many morals I’ve found are based on personal experience. Your belief in god is in fact substantiated by your own relative morality. While society can agree on big things, groups often have vastly different ideas of what right and wrong are.

[Whateverist]

I only believe objective morals can exist with the existence of god otherwise everything is subjective, so this is where the atheist is screwed. 9/11, the three standard perceptions you can have with the moral compass and lack therof is 1. Evil action. 2. just a action(good and evil doesn't exist) 3. good action. Whichever one you pick for your subjective truth there is still two delusions that you're subjectivelyperceiving on a subconscious level. When bypassing the usa law and going straight to the theory there is no chief in command to dictate the absolute answer so all 3 of these perceptions(even though they cancel each other out) are valid with the theory for the individual that wants to perceive it differently than you. All 3 of these perceptions are impossible to be wrong with the theory but you're perceiving two of the answers as delusions so this is a contradiction within itself. If there are two delusion that are compatible with your theory then it means you don't even believe the theory is 100% truthful 100% factual on subconscious levels. That's whats behind the atheist mask of fact, logic, reason, science, intelligence,.They are all sitting on a subjective truth accompanied by two subjective delusion on a subconscious level which means they don't even believe it, It's all a mask to deny god while playing dumb that god doesn't exist.

Just because anybody can’t really agree on how morals work doesn’t prove or disprove god. Morals exist, we understand them as part of a human condition, and yes they are partially relative to the experience. To deny this is to deny any difference from person to person. Many morals I’ve found are based on personal experience. Your belief in god is in fact substantiated by your own relative morality. While society can agree on big things, groups often have vastly different ideas of what right and wrong are.

That was the one and only post that user ever posted here and will probably be the last.  They're like little kids rattling a stick in a hive and then running like hell.