Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 8, 2018 at 10:31 pm
(This post was last modified: March 8, 2018 at 10:33 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(March 8, 2018 at 6:23 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: You have what appears to be, for all intents and purposes, an ‘old days’ televangelist asserting that god is present, and that there is a light above a woman’s head. You have no evidence of this alleged light above her head, and no evidence that the light in the photo is god. An assertion that it is god is not evidence that it is. You simply take Branham at his word? Why on earth would you do that? Tell me, Huggy; how much money have you wired to Nigerian princes over the years? We'll it appears you didn't watch the video if full context.
Let me tell you a little about William Branham.
First of all, he's never been on television and he was passed away before I was even born.
2. He had a seventh grade education
3. Never took an offering in 30 something years of preaching
4. Worked a full time job to make ends meet (do you imagine someone like Billy Graham working a 9-5 Job?)
5. Everything he had was pretty much donated to him, even his suits were donated to him, in fact he took out an ad in the local paper apologizing for driving a Cadillac that was donated to him.
Up until now, you've heard of Billy Graham, you've heard of Oral Roberts, but you've never heard of William Branham, they were all preaching at the same time.
So what exactly was Branham's endgame? It clearly wasn't the money.
That being said you can't claim the light was fake because a picture exists of it, you can't claim the picture was fake because you have people who claimed they saw it.
Your only rebuttal to any of this is basically
You guys skipped all the way past your supposed default position of "I don't know" and went into full denial mode based only on pure speculations. Your rejection of the evidence can only be based upon on the idea that all things that exist in the universe are known, is that what you're saying?
Posts: 3461
Threads: 25
Joined: August 9, 2015
Reputation:
27
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 8, 2018 at 10:36 pm
(March 8, 2018 at 10:31 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: (March 8, 2018 at 6:23 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: You have what appears to be, for all intents and purposes, an ‘old days’ televangelist asserting that god is present, and that there is a light above a woman’s head. You have no evidence of this alleged light above her head, and no evidence that the light in the photo is god. An assertion that it is god is not evidence that it is. You simply take Branham at his word? Why on earth would you do that? Tell me, Huggy; how much money have you wired to Nigerian princes over the years? We'll it appears you didn't watch the video if full context.
Let me tell you a little about William Branham.
First of all, he's never been on television and he was passed away before I was even born.
2. He had a seventh grade education
3. Never took an offering in 30 something years of preaching
4. Worked a full time job to make ends meet (do you imagine someone like Billy Graham working a 9-5 Job?)
5. Everything he had was pretty much donated to him, even his suits were donated to him, in fact he took out an ad in the local paper apologizing for driving a Cadillac that was donated to him.
Up until now, you've heard of Billy Graham, you've heard of Oral Roberts, but you've never heard of William Branham, they were all preaching at the same time.
So what exactly was Branham's endgame? It clearly wasn't the money.
That being said you can't claim the light was fake because a picture exists of it, you can't claim the picture was fake because you have people who claimed they saw it.
Your only rebuttal to any of this is basically
You guys skipped all the way past your supposed default position of "I don't know" and went into full denial mode based only on pure speculations. Your rejection of the evidence can only be based upon on the idea that all things that exist in the universe are known, is that what you're saying?
Yes, and I know the source and you wallow in darkness.
RAmen
"For the only way to eternal glory is a life lived in service of our Lord, FSM; Verily it is FSM who is the perfect being the name higher than all names, king of all kings and will bestow upon us all, one day, The great reclaiming" -The Prophet Boiardi-
Conservative trigger warning.
Posts: 6610
Threads: 73
Joined: May 31, 2014
Reputation:
56
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 8, 2018 at 10:50 pm
(March 8, 2018 at 10:31 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: (March 8, 2018 at 6:23 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: You have what appears to be, for all intents and purposes, an ‘old days’ televangelist asserting that god is present, and that there is a light above a woman’s head. You have no evidence of this alleged light above her head, and no evidence that the light in the photo is god. An assertion that it is god is not evidence that it is. You simply take Branham at his word? Why on earth would you do that? Tell me, Huggy; how much money have you wired to Nigerian princes over the years? We'll it appears you didn't watch the video if full context.
Let me tell you a little about William Branham.
First of all, he's never been on television and he was passed away before I was even born.
2. He had a seventh grade education
3. Never took an offering in 30 something years of preaching
4. Worked a full time job to make ends meet (do you imagine someone like Billy Graham working a 9-5 Job?)
5. Everything he had was pretty much donated to him, even his suits were donated to him, in fact he took out an ad in the local paper apologizing for driving a Cadillac that was donated to him.
Up until now, you've heard of Billy Graham, you've heard of Oral Roberts, but you've never heard of William Branham, they were all preaching at the same time.
So what exactly was Branham's endgame? It clearly wasn't the money.
That being said you can't claim the light was fake because a picture exists of it, you can't claim the picture was fake because you have people who claimed they saw it.
Your only rebuttal to any of this is basically
You guys skipped all the way past your supposed default position of "I don't know" and went into full denial mode based only on pure speculations. Your rejection of the evidence can only be based upon on the idea that all things that exist in the universe are known, is that what you're saying?
It doesn't matter what you think about Branham. I have yet to see evidence of God in any of the pictures or audio recordings you keep referring to.
Posts: 5664
Threads: 219
Joined: June 20, 2016
Reputation:
61
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 8, 2018 at 10:53 pm
(March 8, 2018 at 10:31 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: (March 8, 2018 at 6:23 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: You have what appears to be, for all intents and purposes, an ‘old days’ televangelist asserting that god is present, and that there is a light above a woman’s head. You have no evidence of this alleged light above her head, and no evidence that the light in the photo is god. An assertion that it is god is not evidence that it is. You simply take Branham at his word? Why on earth would you do that? Tell me, Huggy; how much money have you wired to Nigerian princes over the years? We'll it appears you didn't watch the video if full context.
Let me tell you a little about William Branham.
First of all, he's never been on television and he was passed away before I was even born.
2. He had a seventh grade education
3. Never took an offering in 30 something years of preaching
4. Worked a full time job to make ends meet (do you imagine someone like Billy Graham working a 9-5 Job?)
5. Everything he had was pretty much donated to him, even his suits were donated to him, in fact he took out an ad in the local paper apologizing for driving a Cadillac that was donated to him.
Up until now, you've heard of Billy Graham, you've heard of Oral Roberts, but you've never heard of William Branham, they were all preaching at the same time.
So what exactly was Branham's endgame? It clearly wasn't the money.
That being said you can't claim the light was fake because a picture exists of it, you can't claim the picture was fake because you have people who claimed they saw it.
Your only rebuttal to any of this is basically
You guys skipped all the way past your supposed default position of "I don't know" and went into full denial mode based only on pure speculations. Your rejection of the evidence can only be based upon on the idea that all things that exist in the universe are known, is that what you're saying? I have met Marilyn Hickey. She is a money grubbing charlatan!
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 8, 2018 at 10:58 pm
Quote:2. He had a seventh grade education
It shows. But he's got you by 5 years.
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation:
92
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 9, 2018 at 12:23 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2018 at 12:25 am by LadyForCamus.)
(March 8, 2018 at 10:31 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: (March 8, 2018 at 6:23 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: You have what appears to be, for all intents and purposes, an ‘old days’ televangelist asserting that god is present, and that there is a light above a woman’s head. You have no evidence of this alleged light above her head, and no evidence that the light in the photo is god. An assertion that it is god is not evidence that it is. You simply take Branham at his word? Why on earth would you do that? Tell me, Huggy; how much money have you wired to Nigerian princes over the years? We'll it appears you didn't watch the video if full context.
Let me tell you a little about William Branham.
First of all, he's never been on television and he was passed away before I was even born.
2. He had a seventh grade education
3. Never took an offering in 30 something years of preaching
4. Worked a full time job to make ends meet (do you imagine someone like Billy Graham working a 9-5 Job?)
5. Everything he had was pretty much donated to him, even his suits were donated to him, in fact he took out an ad in the local paper apologizing for driving a Cadillac that was donated to him.
Up until now, you've heard of Billy Graham, you've heard of Oral Roberts, but you've never heard of William Branham, they were all preaching at the same time.
So what exactly was Branham's endgame? It clearly wasn't the money.
That being said you can't claim the light was fake because a picture exists of it, you can't claim the picture was fake because you have people who claimed they saw it.
Your only rebuttal to any of this is basically
You guys skipped all the way past your supposed default position of "I don't know" and went into full denial mode based only on pure speculations. Your rejection of the evidence can only be based upon on the idea that all things that exist in the universe are known, is that what you're saying? I’m not sure what any of the above has to do with evidence of the light being caused by a god?
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 9, 2018 at 12:31 am
When a believer wants to believe they will believe fucking anything.
Posts: 6610
Threads: 73
Joined: May 31, 2014
Reputation:
56
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 9, 2018 at 12:37 am
(March 9, 2018 at 12:31 am)Minimalist Wrote: When a believer wants to believe they will believe fucking anything.
Ain't that the truth.
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 9, 2018 at 2:18 am
Well, I'll give Huggy credit for at least posting the evidence he claimed to have. How that's supposed to be evidence of anything though, I have no idea.
It's sad that he hates Odin so much, he doesn't want to believe he is real. He is so biased against me because I don't believe in his God, that he has dismissed my eye witness testimony out of hand completely. He's also dismissed my brother's, and LadyforCamus's.
Obviously, I'd sent photos of Odin if I could. I mean, Huggy would instantly dismiss them even if I did, but the fact that I can't do so proves Odin doesn't show up in photos.
What would it take for Huggy to believe? What more do I need to do?
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 9, 2018 at 4:12 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2018 at 4:23 am by Amarok.)
So Huggies evidence is a guys testimony. And a biography on the guy as if that relevant. Oh and a dumb meme. I can play too.
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
|