Another sex poll...4 or 9?

[c172]

I'm getting old, and not just tired but cranky. But my standards are not just stupid high, but stupidly high. I just couldn't do a 4. With me having slowed down, I think once a week with a 9 might be fine.

Then again, it might not. My fantasy life is is kind of...I don't know..."demanding?" And actually being with a 9 might perk me up in ways I can't cope with.

[Catholic_Lady]

Follow-up question to the guys who chose the 9...

How many times per week would you be masturbating?

I'm not a guy but I chose 9 lol. Since I'd be completely satisfied with once a week, there would be no temptation to masturbate, which I try to avoid anyway.

My husband was recently away for 4 weeks for some training and I didnt masturbate once. I had dreams though.

[paulpablo]

Weirdly I was talking to someone I know about the scale of 1 to 10 today, she's a lesbian, I'm pretty sure she knows I think she's good looking and we joke around about it but we were talking about other girls and their mark out of 10.

This is just how I work out the out of 10 scenario.
I don't think people go to extremes enough when considering the lower ranking, like 1 isn't just physically a bit ugly or not to your taste, 1 would be like the most physically deformed human on the planet.  You only get into the area of any remote attraction at around a 7.  In my estimation 6 is someone you'll sleep with for purely sexual needs if you're that type of person, 5 is getting to the area that I'd consider to be out of bounds unless I find myself in prison or something and this woman is a guard and I just need it.

Taking that into consideration, as harsh as it sounds, I would never begin to consider having sex with someone who I thought was 4 out of 10, that would be more like a punishment than a relief.

I could easily just have sex once a week, and the build up to it would be immense, and it's with a girl who's a 9, that sounds like a great deal to me, I'd sign up for that.

I dunno to me you have to put it even down the middle. 5 would be you don't really find them attractive but they aren't ugly either. Midway between 5 & 10 would be yes they are good looking. 10 is sexy as all get out. Going the other way midway between 1 & 5 is yeah that person is ugly. 1 being the wouldn't poke it with a stick. Since there are so few numbers on each side going up or down a number is a big deal. The difference between sleeping with a 7 & 8 is yeah that's cool and I'm totally wanting this.

For me there's either attractive or ugly, no middleground in women.  I can't think of a female where I thought she wasn't ugly but not really attractive, that description would only fit a man.  I can get a sense that a man is or isn't ugly, and when they're not ugly I don't think they're attractive, I just think hey I bet that guy gets more than his fair share. 

But going along with the splitting down the middle thing, 4 would be the upper level of ugly.  I'd still rather go for the 9.

---

This is just how I work out the out of 10 scenario.
I don't think people go to extremes enough when considering the lower ranking, like 1 isn't just physically a bit ugly or not to your taste, 1 would be like the most physically deformed human on the planet.  You only get into the area of any remote attraction at around a 7.  In my estimation 6 is someone you'll sleep with for purely sexual needs if you're that type of person, 5 is getting to the area that I'd consider to be out of bounds unless I find myself in prison or something and this woman is a guard and I just need it.

Yeah, uh, maybe you're overthinking this a bit.

And talking about how much masturbation I'd do inbetween sex, probably once a night before I sleep which is pretty much what I do anyway when I'm getting no sex.  Ontop of that I know games couples can play that involve no touching that I probably shouldn't go into because it's not area 69.

When it comes to the day of sex I'd just take breaks inbetween the session everytime I think I'm about to finish.

[Losty]

I don’t wanna choose an exclusive relationship. Why can’t I have the 4 and the 9?

[vorlon13]

and everything in between ?

[Shell B]

My 10 as much as he wants it.

[downbeatplumb]

It probably sounds odd to say but I've always found that a woman's body animated by a warm personality who enjoys and is enthusiastic about sex will appeal to me a great deal across a wide variety of shapes, and lets face it, there is greater variability among women's bodies.  Doesn't mean I don't fixate on certain things like butt shape or mammary valleys, but within wide parameters I can appreciate many forms.

The reverse is usually also true.  Women who are shaped in ways that seem intrinsically appealing who have no interest in (and likely no appreciation or talent for) sex would not be something I'd gravitate toward in real life.  One attempt to warm a cold fish was usually enough to put me off for good when I was dating.

Nothing beats enthusiasm.

[Whateverist]

I don’t wanna choose an exclusive relationship. Why can’t I have the 4 and the 9?

Wait .. you mean at the same time?  What tasks would you assign them?

---

Follow-up question to the guys who chose the 9...

How many times per week would you be masturbating?

I'm not a guy but I chose 9 lol. Since I'd be completely satisfied with once a week, there would be no temptation to masturbate, which I try to avoid anyway.

My husband was recently away for 4 weeks for some training and I didnt masturbate once. I had dreams though.

Wow, you're really taking that relationship for granted.  Four weeks away and you don't do any homework?  Tsk.

[SaStrike]

9 with the 4 as a side chick, no need for masturbation then.

[Whateverist]

9 with the 4 as a side chick, no need for masturbation then.

We might need to set up a parallel thread in A69 where we can provide illustrations of what we have in mind.  (No looking Cath-y!)