DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Phoque]

I'm still not seeing how DNA can prove a designer's existence. It seems rather... chaotic. Humans have 46 chromosomes, some roses have 14, hummingbirds have 80, some frogs have 26, some frogs have 20, toads have 22, chimpanzees & gorillas have 48, catfish have 58, and so on.

Seems like they'd be a lot more organized, don't you think? And why would we share over half of our DNA with Ray Comfort's beloved banana? It's almost as if we have similar origins some time far, far back...

[T0 Th3 M4X]

Dark Matter is simply a name given to something we cannot observe directly 'hence dark matter' but we can very much see the effects of. We have lots of evidence it exists.  The nearest thing to it would be gravity, we don't actually know what gravity is, but we observe its effect very well and could show evidence that gravity is present.

Same with dark matter, what it is made of is a mystery but again it effects are predictable and observable. So we know 'something' is there and can prove it. DarK Matter is simply a placeholder name given to it, till hopefully one day we do.

https://home.cern/science/physics/dark-matter

He wants to "see" it, and you forgot the "compressed rock". 

Did you find the rock yet?

[Bucky Ball]

He wants to "see" it, and you forgot the "compressed rock". 

Did you find the rock yet?

It has been located. 
I don't have a consent to open your head.

[Abaddon_ire]

He wants to "see" it, and you forgot the "compressed rock". 

Did you find the rock yet?

Can you show me a youtube of an electron? Of course not. Therefore electricity is actually caused by Vishnu. Obviously.

[T0 Th3 M4X]

Did you find the rock yet?

It has been located. 
I don't have a consent to open your head.

Right, so another excuse.  Got it master scientist.

[Nay_Sayer]

This was a scientific thread with religious implications.  Then I was asked religious questions which is understandable.

Nothing you've ever stated could ever be misconstrued as facts.  Bless.

RAmen

All I speak are facts and atheists try to dispute them.

All you do is spout nonsense and they try for a number of pages to decipher it. Bless

Ramen

[Peebothuhlu]

At work.

It has been located. 
I don't have a consent to open your head.

Right, so another excuse.  Got it master scientist.

That wasn't an 'Excuse'. That was a 'Jab' or 'Poke'. Otherwise known as a polite backhand.

However. It does raise a possibly interesting question.

How do you know what's inside your head, M4X?

I mean...... you say you don't...... but how do you know?

Care to elucidate/expand upon such a question?

Or, failing that, giving answering the question a go?

[Bucky Ball]

It has been located. 
I don't have a consent to open your head.

Right, so another excuse.  Got it master scientist.

Said the Excuse Master who doesn't even get how idiotic the question is.
Now about those definitions ... Excuse Master.

So another day, and you have all day to sit here. Hmmmmm.

[LastPoet]

So another day, and you have all day to sit here. Hmmmmm.

Well, you get what you want -.-;

To give him the time of day is foolish, but well hearted (in a metaphorical way).

[CDF47]

All I speak are facts and atheists try to dispute them.

Nope. You keep lying about DNA is machine code when it isn't.

Disagree? The go ahead and provide the op-code/operand structure of DNA, Or the mnemonic/symbolic structure of DNA, or the function limits or fork/join functions, anything.

You can't because you have no clue what those are.

My point was it operates like a mini-manufacturing plant, which it clearly does.  Again, see the videos in my signature.

---

At work.

The Youtube clip is clear evidence of design.

So, yes, a Youtube clip is evidence of something being designed.    

Watching a Youtube clip does little more than entertain.

The value, educational or other wise, of such a video definitely doesn't rate as high as an actual accredited journal paper.

It's not 'Actual' science.  It's more like a colloquial chat.

Now if you want to present a proper, peer reviewed paper on the subject?

What specifically do you disagree with about the video?

---

I'm still not seeing how DNA can prove a designer's existence. It seems rather... chaotic. Humans have 46 chromosomes, some roses have 14, hummingbirds have 80, some frogs have 26, some frogs have 20, toads have 22, chimpanzees & gorillas have 48, catfish have 58, and so on.

Seems like they'd be a lot more organized, don't you think? And why would we share over half of our DNA with Ray Comfort's beloved banana? It's almost as if we have similar origins some time far, far back...

There's nothing wrong there.  That doesn't disprove design.  Just shows common DNA is used for various systems.

---

This was a scientific thread with religious implications.  Then I was asked religious questions which is understandable.

All I speak are facts and atheists try to dispute them.

All you do is spout nonsense and they try for a number of pages to decipher it. Bless

Ramen

LOL...That's your opinion.  I disagree with you of course.