DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Amarok]

LOL

Yes your comments are hilarious

---

I got more information for you all.

Yaay more crap you dug out of the ID pit of pseudoscience

[Joods]

You’re a troll, and a boring one at that.

How I am trolling the site by just providing facts?  Some people on here may not be aware of these things.  Others may be intellectually dishonest.

You aren't providing facts. Your opinion is NOT a fact.

[Amarok]

How I am trolling the site by just providing facts?  Some people on here may not be aware of these things.  Others may be intellectually dishonest.

You aren't providing facts. Your opinion is NOT a fact.

And not even an intelligent opinion .

[CDF47]

The scientist (Kenyon) who came up with the Biochemical Predestination Theory found his theory impossible after breakthroughs in DNA became apparent. Experiments showed that amino acids do not have the capability to order themselves into a biological meaningful sequence. The origin of genetic information caused Kenyon to reassess his biochemical predestination position regarding origins. Kenyon then went out looking for the source of the biological information in DNA. Kenyon realized he faced a narrowing set of options. By the 1970’s most researchers rejected the idea that the information necessary to build the first cells originated by chance alone.

[The Grand Nudger]

We're at least learning potential facts about CDFs state of mind and formative influences.  I always find that the most interesting thing in threads like this.  The OPs come to teach the heathens, and they do...but only about themselves.

---

The scientist (Kenyon) who came up with the Biochemical Predestination Theory found his theory impossible after breakthroughs in DNA became apparent.  Experiments showed that amino acids do not have the capability to order themselves into a biological meaningful sequence.  The origin of genetic information caused Kenyon to reassess his biochemical predestination position regarding origins.  Kenyon then went out looking for the source of the biological information in DNA.  Kenyon realized he faced a narrowing set of options.  By the 1970’s most researchers rejected the idea that the information necessary to build the first cells originated by chance alone.

No one had -ever- thought that the formation of the first life was "by chance alone"....so? The prevailing hypothesis..today (and frankly, for as long as this has been an area of modern scientific study) is that the formation of the first life.ultimately, has it;s origins in the predictable interactions between organic chemistry and it;s specific circumstances.

That;s the whole point of modeling situations and combinations.

Would you like to know more?

[CDF47]

We're at least learning potential facts about CDFs state of mind and formative influences.  I always find that the most interesting thing in threads like this.  The OPs come to teach the heathens, and they do...but only about themselves.

---

The scientist (Kenyon) who came up with the Biochemical Predestination Theory found his theory impossible after breakthroughs in DNA became apparent.  Experiments showed that amino acids do not have the capability to order themselves into a biological meaningful sequence.  The origin of genetic information caused Kenyon to reassess his biochemical predestination position regarding origins.  Kenyon then went out looking for the source of the biological information in DNA.  Kenyon realized he faced a narrowing set of options.  By the 1970’s most researchers rejected the idea that the information necessary to build the first cells originated by chance alone.

No one had -ever- thought that the formation of the first life was "by chance alone"....so?

I learn a lot about you all as well.

[The Grand Nudger]

I doubt that very much, but if you manage to peek up and over the parapet from time to time... good for you. That should help to disabuse you of a great many other misconceptions you walked in the door with.

I look forward to seeing the effect that has on you and your beliefs.

[Joods]

The scientist (Kenyon) who came up with the Biochemical Predestination Theory found his theory impossible after breakthroughs in DNA became apparent.  Experiments showed that amino acids do not have the capability to order themselves into a biological meaningful sequence.  The origin of genetic information caused Kenyon to reassess his biochemical predestination position regarding origins.  Kenyon then went out looking for the source of the biological information in DNA.  Kenyon realized he faced a narrowing set of options.  By the 1970’s most researchers rejected the idea that the information necessary to build the first cells originated by chance alone.

So you reference a book that was produced in 1969, decades before DNA analysis is even possible? Well no shit Sherlock. Of course scientific theories will change. As long as new discoveries are being made, the old theories are put to rest. 

You should try using CURRENT information instead of shit that's over 40 years old.

[Amarok]

I learn a lot about you all as well.

No one thought as such 

And congrats on using an outdated book

[robvalue]

Are you under the impression that theres no such thing as a natural design?  Wouldn;t that undermine the credibility of your belief in ID even further?  Not only is nothing specifically indicative of design.....the natural mechanism in order to accomplish some hypothetical design deosn;t even exist.

That's the thing, "natural" doesn't mean anything when someone like this guy assumes before you start that everything is designed. So even what he considers to be his falsifiability is impossible.