DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Nay_Sayer]

Sorry but you've walked a fine line when it comes to the rules. 


There's this from the Prime Directive that constitutes flaming: 

that you've done numerous times to atheists here. You have insulted us and our intelligence on a generalized scale. 

There's also this: 

You have outrageously misrepresented DNA and its surrounding events, which is public record, through the duration of this entire thread. Even when evidence has been provided to you over and over showing you that you are, and continue to be wrong. 

Also - on more than one occasion, you have posted content from other sites here without proper citations. In other words - you may have written them elsewhere, but you failed miserably to state the forum or site that you copied your own info from, thus trying to make it look like you were genuinely responding to another post here. Whether or not it's your work, failing to cite it is still a form of plagiarism. 

So why don't you just do us all a favor and quit while your ahead.

After all I put up with in here that is a joke.  I presented facts throughout this thread and read every post and responded to tons of them to the best of my ability.  I guess if I get banned, so be it.

---

So do you believe that DNA is objective proof of a Creator?

Yes, because of the information bearing properties of DNA and the operation of the molecular machinery, I believe it is objective proof of a Creator.

[CDF47]

After all I put up with in here that is a joke.  I presented facts throughout this thread and read every post and responded to tons of them to the best of my ability.  I guess if I get banned, so be it.

---

Yes, because of the information bearing properties of DNA and the operation of the molecular machinery, I believe it is objective proof of a Creator.

Indeed

[Abaddon_ire]

You don't make up an entire group of people. That's the difference. You walked right into the shit you got. AND you dished it back so quit whining about it.

I very slightly dished it back out.  I held back quite a bit considering the insults I had to deal with.  I understand ridicule is a manipulative debate tactic from a losing opponent but this was taken to an extreme in my opinion.  I walked in here with proof and it was ignored and attempts to refute it were made despite the clear proof with a code embedded in DNA.

---

That's right. When all arguments fail.... Push your Christian agenda.

Push that fucking bullshit elsewhere. You have NO proof that your god, let along ANY god even exists.

DNA proves a Creator exists.

Nope. DNA simply proves chemistry exists. Take your strawmen and burn them already.

[*Deidre*]

After all I put up with in here that is a joke.  I presented facts throughout this thread and read every post and responded to tons of them to the best of my ability.  I guess if I get banned, so be it.

---

Yes, because of the information bearing properties of DNA and the operation of the molecular machinery, I believe it is objective proof of a Creator.

What does this mean?

[CDF47]

I very slightly dished it back out.  I held back quite a bit considering the insults I had to deal with.  I understand ridicule is a manipulative debate tactic from a losing opponent but this was taken to an extreme in my opinion.  I walked in here with proof and it was ignored and attempts to refute it were made despite the clear proof with a code embedded in DNA.

---

DNA proves a Creator exists.

Nope. DNA simply proves chemistry exists. Take your strawmen and burn them already.

No way.  This is where the big lie comes in.  It is the functional sequence of the DNA genetic information that controls the process and the sequence of amino acids. This is not just dumb simple chemistry. It is intelligently designed functional information. Trying to cover up this fact.

---

What does this mean?

Trying to say baiting for people or fishing for them.

[LadyForCamus]

You don't make up an entire group of people. That's the difference. You walked right into the shit you got. AND you dished it back so quit whining about it.

I very slightly dished it back out.  I held back quite a bit considering the insults I had to deal with.  I understand ridicule is a manipulative debate tactic from a losing opponent but this was taken to an extreme in my opinion.  I walked in here with proof and it was ignored and attempts to refute it were made despite the clear proof with a code embedded in DNA.

---

That's right. When all arguments fail.... Push your Christian agenda.

Push that fucking bullshit elsewhere. You have NO proof that your god, let along ANY god even exists.

DNA proves a Creator exists.

[CDF47]

I very slightly dished it back out.  I held back quite a bit considering the insults I had to deal with.  I understand ridicule is a manipulative debate tactic from a losing opponent but this was taken to an extreme in my opinion.  I walked in here with proof and it was ignored and attempts to refute it were made despite the clear proof with a code embedded in DNA.

---

DNA proves a Creator exists.

Again, there is no way a blind undirected process could develop the information bearing properties contain in DNA.

[Amarok]

You are so tough with the ridicule from behind a keyboard. 

It has nothing to do with being tough. And if we met face to face i would say everything i'm saying now . As i have said to creationist face to face many many many times .

 Is it supposed to hurt my feelings?

Nope ridicule is not for the ridiculed .

---

Again, there is no way a blind undirected process could develop the information bearing properties contain in DNA.

Baseless assertion 

[CDF47]

You are so tough with the ridicule from behind a keyboard. 

It has nothing to do with being tough. And if we met face to face i would say everything i'm saying now . As i have said to creationist face to face many many many times .

 Is it supposed to hurt my feelings?

Nope ridicule is not for the ridiculed .

---

Again, there is no way a blind undirected process could develop the information bearing properties contain in DNA.

Baseless assertion 

Ridicule is an old dirty debate trick for the losing side.  

Not a baseless assertion.  I provided the facts, documented information, videos,..., to backup the claim.

[Amarok]

No way. 

Yes way 

 This is where the big lie comes in.  

Nope the contraryarary is the lie 

It is the functional sequence of the DNA genetic information that controls the process and the sequence of amino acids

Nope DNA is simply chemistry  like million other reactions 

This is not just dumb simple chemistry.

Yes it is it's chemistry 

It is intelligently designed functional information. 

No it's not it's naturally occuring biochemistry and every REAL scientist knows it.

Trying to cover up this fact.

Your ID nutcases are weaving deluded conspiracy

---

Ridicule is an old dirty debate trick for the losing side.  

Nope it's a fine age old strategy of the reasonable to chide unreasonable .  

Not a baseless assertion.  I provided the facts, documented information, videos,..., to backup the claim.

No you didn't you provided Pseudoscience propaganda and distortions of science to push your creationist agenda and truck load of fallacious conclusions . Not a single fact to be found .