DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Everena]

They are interacting while they are existing in 2 different places. Please educate yourself about this. I am right and you are wrong. Let it go.

Nope the  opposite

You are now denying the validity of proven science. It has been demonstrated over and over again to be true. Sorry, but you need an education and to learn to accept hard facts.

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Box of rocks.

QFT.

Ain’t no talking to this one kiddos. Anything that was behind the eyes was rotted away a long time ago.

[Joods]

I accept your right to deny the existence of God without proof, but as for myself, I know God exists beyond any and all doubt and some day you will too.

Not preaching eh? Fuck off you fecking cunt. Quit pushing your stupid beliefs on those who do not care for them.

[Everena]

So do I. I think all religions are man-made but with a good purpose in mind. Higher intelligence as the creator of this universe is still the only logical assumption.

But only so long as we feel the need to posit a creator.  There could be a higher level intentionality going on behind the scenes to bring things together the way they are, but I definitely don't think there must have been.  Do you?  It seems once again we start from a different hunch regarding what we can't verify.  I strongly doubt any higher order intentionality is required.  I could be wrong about that but I feel it is highly unlikely.  I can conceive of a natural god arising in consciousness right along side our sense of self.  That would fit with a number of phenomena, including supporting the wide spread appeal of god belief.  But how could such a natural god have anything to do with cosmos creation?

God always has been and always will be, just like our true selves. I appreciate your honesty and flexibility, but God has been proven to me beyond any and all doubt, so I am looking at things from a very different perspective.

[Fidel_Castronaut]

To be fair Joods, this one couldn’t score in a brothel...except maybe an own goal.

[Joods]

To be fair Joods, this one couldn’t score in a brothel...except maybe an own goal.

You're probably right. You know how sick I am of these preachy assholes coming in here with their agendas. I just wish they'd all go the hell away.

[Bucky Ball]

But only so long as we feel the need to posit a creator.  There could be a higher level intentionality going on behind the scenes to bring things together the way they are, but I definitely don't think there must have been.  Do you?  It seems once again we start from a different hunch regarding what we can't verify.  I strongly doubt any higher order intentionality is required.  I could be wrong about that but I feel it is highly unlikely.  I can conceive of a natural god arising in consciousness right along side our sense of self.  That would fit with a number of phenomena, including supporting the wide spread appeal of god belief.  But how could such a natural god have anything to do with cosmos creation?

God always has been and always will be, just like our true selves. I appreciate your honesty and flexibility, but God has been proven to me beyond any and all doubt, so I am looking at things from a very different perspective.

Still repeating your unsupported assertions I see.
The moon is made of green cheese.

So then you're not really a theist, I see. If you have proof, you need no faith. You're the only theist on the planet who doesn't need faith. How bizarre.

An omnipotent deity could have created a race of robot universe makers .... and this would suffice to plug in your god-gap.
A "designer" could be anyone on the design chain.

[Whateverist]

God always has been and always will be, just like our true selves.

Maybe but I don't think my true self has been around for anymore than 65 years, and I scarcely remember all of that. Is that just a working definition or do you have a reason to think so? I could grant you that a natural god arising in consciousness can be older than our modern conscious selves .. but always? Can't follow you there. Another difference in hunches I guess.

I appreciate your honesty and flexibility, but God has been proven to me beyond any and all doubt, so I am looking at things from a very different perspective.

As would I if I'd had that same experience and didn't have the conceptual framework I do for making sense of it. I'm sure your experience is genuine and significant, but I don't think it supports all the conclusions you are drawing from it. Your choice to make though, as you should. But I'll leave you to wrestle with the lions if you enjoy that sort of sport. But I'm available by P.M. Have fun.

[Everena]

God always has been and always will be, just like our true selves. I appreciate your honesty and flexibility, but God has been proven to me beyond any and all doubt, so I am looking at things from a very different perspective.

Still repeating your unsupported assertions I see.
The moon is made of green cheese.

So then you're not really a theist, I see. If you have proof, you need no faith. You're the only theist on the planet who doesn't need faith. How bizarre.

An omnipotent deity could have created a race of robot universe makers .... and this would suffice to plug in your god-gap.
A "designer" could be anyone on the design chain.

I can assure you that I am not the only theist who does not need faith. Many of us have had God proven to us beyond any and all doubt. You just don't want to accept that we know something that you don't know yet. We are living on entirely different level of existence than you are. God did not create our souls, just our flesh to inhabit while we are here. Some day you will be just as sure about all of this as I am. Peace.

[The Grand Nudger]

Not just a dense asshole..a dense asshole with delusions of granduer.

Awesome.