DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Peebothuhlu]

At work.

At work.


 Um..... is salt natural?
Everena: Yes, salt is a mineral genius

You do understand the acid chemistry inside your stomach, right?

That it's the breaking of the chemical, phosphorus (Pretty sure it's phosphorus) bond on the 'Tail' of the ATP molecule that's pretty much the power/fuel in all cells and hence 'Life'?

Hence why their is the entire feild of, y'know, "Bio-chemistry"?

Why we can isolate the active chemical in willow trees instead of just gnawing on tree bark?

Why the purely mechanical.and hence 'Artificial' method of binding nitrogen is the reason we even have enough farming to feed every one said (Your term) amazing food.

Cheers.

Yes our bodies are amazing the way they can break down food, store it in case of a famine, and utilize the essential nutrients we need. And that is just more proof that intelligence was involved in creating us.

I do appologize for missing you enbolden reply.

So.... a 'Mineral'. Like Bauxite is a mineral? Or coal?

I note you've been a tad selective in your reply.
So how, pray tell, do our bodies go about their business of breaking down such food minerals like 'Salt'?

What, pray tell, might the mineral salt be/consist/is made of?

Cheers.

[Everena]

This entire universe and everything in it is evidence of higher intelligence. And food is evidence of God. Why do we have food for every fish, bird, insect, ... food for the approx 8.7 million different species of conscious life? Something like food being here, and being delicious and providing energy and nutrients cannot just be written off to chance or luck. And then there are medicinal plants and herbs as well.


First of all that does not answer the question of why we have food on this planet or why it would be delicious and provide nutrients to 8.7 million different species of life. No way that was just by sheer luck.
Also, it is not just predator and prey. Herbivores only eat plants. Omnivores like us can easily survive without meat and are only eating it by choice. Also food cannot be a result of a millennia of evolution. Food had to be here the entire time or everthing would be dead. And you did not respond to why we would also have medicinal plants and herbs that we derive our sythetic medicines from.

Wrong! All life on the planet is subject to evolution. That some species feed on others is the result evolution, environment and adaptation.

False: Evolution is a process that began after the planet already existed, and the question was:
Why does food exist on this planet in the first place? Food to feed the 8.7 million species of life. Food that not only tastes good, but that provides us nutrients and energy. Are you really going to pretend that was just our good luck? And no more strawman arguments.

[Gwaithmir]

Wrong! All life on the planet is subject to evolution. That some species feed on others is the result evolution, environment and adaptation.

False: Evolution is a process that began after the planet already existed, and the question was:
Why does food exist on this planet in the first place? Food to feed the 8.7 million species of life. Food that not only tastes good, but that provides us nutrients and energy. Are you really going to pretend that was just our good luck? And no more strawman arguments.

Food is living organisms. Species that require food are also living organisms. All living organisms are the result of evolution. That some species feed on others is the result evolution, environment and adaptation. Got it yet?

[Bucky Ball]

The question is not, what are scientists speculating happened when this planet and some living organisms were here already.

Sorry bimbo. Trying to drag the discussion back to your childish nonsense is not working for you.
The questions are NOT what you are so ignorantly asking. NO SCIENTIST asks the crap questions you ask.
The fact is plants were on land 300 million years before animals.

If you have any scientific evidence that refutes the consensus of Biology, let's have it. Now.

False: Evolution is a process that began after the planet already existed, and the question was:
Why does food exist on this planet in the first place? Food to feed the 8.7 million species of life. Food that not only tastes good, but that provides us nutrients and energy. Are you really going to pretend that was just our good luck? And no more strawman arguments.

You don't even know what a strawman fucking is.
No one disputes that evolution began after the planet existed. Doh. Are you really THAT stupid. 
There was nothing/no organisms to EAT this "food" of yours .. for 300 million years. Please stop embarrassing yourself. 
Tell us, what was "eating" these plants before there were animals around ? LOL
It was not food, until something appeared to EAT it. 

Jesus H Christ.

[Amarok]

False: Evolution is a process that began after the planet already existed, and the question was:
Why does food exist on this planet in the first place? Food to feed the 8.7 million species of life. Food that not only tastes good, but that provides us nutrients and energy. Are you really going to pretend that was just our good luck? And no more strawman arguments.

Food is living organisms. Species that require food are also living organisms. All living organisms are the result of evolution. That some species feed on others is the result evolution, environment and adaptation. Got it yet?

Actually food is chemicals organic and inorganic

---

The question is not, what are scientists speculating happened when this planet and some living organisms were here already.

Sorry bimbo. Trying to drag the discussion back to your childish nonsense is not working for you.
The questions are NOT what you are so ignorantly asking. NO SCIENTIST asks the crap questions you ask.
The fact is plants were on land 300 million years before animals.

If you have any scientific evidence that refutes the consensus of Biology, let's have it. Now.

False: Evolution is a process that began after the planet already existed, and the question was:
Why does food exist on this planet in the first place? Food to feed the 8.7 million species of life. Food that not only tastes good, but that provides us nutrients and energy. Are you really going to pretend that was just our good luck? And no more strawman arguments.

You don't even know what a strawman fucking is.
No one disputes that evolution began after the planet existed. Doh. Are you really THAT stupid. 
There was nothing/no organisms to EAT this "food" of yours .. for 300 million years. Please stop embarrassing yourself. 
Tell us, what was "eating" these plants before there were animals around ? LOL
It was not food, until something appeared to EAT it. 

Jesus H Christ.

Indeed she gets it backwards

---

At work.

Yes our bodies are amazing the way they can break down food, store it in case of a famine, and utilize the essential nutrients we need. And that is just more proof that intelligence was involved in creating us.

I do appologize for missing you enbolden reply.

So.... a 'Mineral'. Like Bauxite is a mineral? Or coal?

I note you've been a tad selective in your reply.
So how, pray tell, do our bodies go about their business of breaking down such food minerals like 'Salt'?

What, pray tell, might the mineral salt be/consist/is made of?

Cheers.

Indeed most of what we eat at it's base is inorganic chemistry

[Anomalocaris]

Food is living organisms. Species that require food are also living organisms. All living organisms are the result of evolution. That some species feed on others is the result evolution, environment and adaptation. Got it yet?

Actually food is chemicals organic and inorganic

---

Sorry bimbo. Trying to drag the discussion back to your childish nonsense is not working for you.
The questions are NOT what you are so ignorantly asking. NO SCIENTIST asks the crap questions you ask.
The fact is plants were on land 300 million years before animals.

If you have any scientific evidence that refutes the consensus of Biology, let's have it. Now.


You don't even know what a strawman fucking is.
No one disputes that evolution began after the planet existed. Doh. Are you really THAT stupid. 
There was nothing/no organisms to EAT this "food" of yours .. for 300 million years. Please stop embarrassing yourself. 
Tell us, what was "eating" these plants before there were animals around ? LOL
It was not food, until something appeared to EAT it. 

Jesus H Christ.

Indeed she gets it backwards

Indeed, her head is located at the wrong end of her digestive track.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Wrong! All life on the planet is subject to evolution. That some species feed on others is the result evolution, environment and adaptation.

False: Evolution is a process that began after the planet already existed, and the question was:
Why does food exist on this planet in the first place? Food to feed the 8.7 million species of life. Food that not only tastes good, but that provides us nutrients and energy. Are you really going to pretend that was just our good luck? And no more strawman arguments.

It’s called ‘co-evolution’. Food supplies evolved as organisms that required food evolved. This is an ‘everybody knows’ thing.

Boru

[Anomalocaris]

Maybe one day there will be a movie or novel called “The Stupidification of Everena”.

[Everena]

False: Evolution is a process that began after the planet already existed, and the question was:
Why does food exist on this planet in the first place? Food to feed the 8.7 million species of life. Food that not only tastes good, but that provides us nutrients and energy. Are you really going to pretend that was just our good luck? And no more strawman arguments.

Food is living organisms. Species that require food are also living organisms. All living organisms are the result of evolution. That some species feed on others is the result evolution, environment and adaptation. Got it yet?

Strawman argument. Logical fallacy. It was luck or God. Pick one. And living organisms are not the result of evolution. Evolution is process that started after all living organisms began.

---

False: Evolution is a process that began after the planet already existed, and the question was:
Why does food exist on this planet in the first place? Food to feed the 8.7 million species of life. Food that not only tastes good, but that provides us nutrients and energy. Are you really going to pretend that was just our good luck? And no more strawman arguments.

It’s called ‘co-evolution’. Food supplies evolved as organisms that required food evolved. This is an ‘everybody knows’ thing.

Boru

Food that is here why? We just got lucky that way? Us and 8.7 million other species of life just got super duper lucky? Is that really what you are claiming after presenting a strawman argument?


 And he didn't even touch my question about why medicinal plants and herbs would also be on this planet and the materials we use to make all our medicines (not to mention millions of other useful materials and resources)

[Bucky Ball]

Strawman argument. Logical fallacy. It was luck or God. Pick one. And living organisms are not the result of evolution. Evolution is process that started after all living organisms began.

So you're saying humans were swimming in the oceans with the paleo fish. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_fish

OMG. 

There is a whole level of stupid here no one even thought possible.