Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 16, 2024, 9:20 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 10 Vote(s) - 1.8 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(January 15, 2019 at 9:49 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:
(January 10, 2019 at 11:26 pm)CDF47 Wrote: No, you can't just write off the information being functional like that.  When you see a manufacturing plant you know and infer it is designed.  Well we found a manufacturing plant in the construct of proteins!

I didn't just write off functional information.  I even granted it ex hypothesi in one instance.  What you have done, however, is simply write off my objections without providing any reasons for doing so.  That doesn't work.  So you still face the obstacles I mentioned and you still haven't provided reasons or evidence for your position that functional information, if there is such a thing, cannot arise through natural processes.  As we've seen, clearly it can.  So your objection is that certain functional information can arise through natural processes, but not other functional information.  You haven't given the slightest evidence or reasons for this being true.  And I could care less what you infer when you look at a manufacturing plant unless your inference is based upon sound reasoning about objective properties.  Your belief that the machinery in the cell is a manufacturing plant is wrong in multiple respects.  First, it's not literally a manufacturing plant, but rather, to some people, it is analogous to a manufacturing plant.  In some ways it is, in some ways it isn't.  In the sense that both rely on natural processes to achieve their ends, it is.  In the sense that it is designed, that's the question at issue, and you can't simply rely upon certain similarities between it and a manufacturing plant to necessarily imply other properties that an actual manufacturing plant possesses.  That doesn't work as a matter of logic.  As a matter of persuasion, Hume stated the relevant rule regarding analogies that, inasmuch as the cases are similar, the argument has force, but inasmuch as the case analogized departs from that to which it is analogized, its argumentative force is weakened, to the point that, if the cases are grossly dissimilar, the argument has no force at all.  The similarities between the processes in the cell and those in a manufacturing plant are sufficiently dissimilar that your argument that there is "[something like] a manufacturing plant" in the cell has no force at all, and is dismissed.  Second, we know a manufacturing plant, or ones like it, are designed because of the similarity to other ones of its kind.  We don't have other similar systems to the cell that we know are designed, so we can't make the same inference in the case of the cell because the foundation of that inference, a similarity to things known to be designed, doesn't exist.  Beyond that you would have to demonstrate that we can know objectively that a manufacturing plant is designed if we have no similar cases.  This you haven't done and likely cannot do, so likening it to a manufacturing plant doesn't help you as we have no way of determining that a manufacturing plant is designed which we could then apply to the cell.  So the manufacturing plant analogy fails in multiple ways.

So, I'm still waiting on some reasons or evidence for your belief, and so far, despite patient interrogation over many days, you've provided none.  I would be well justified in concluding that you have no reasons or evidence for your views.  If you do, then provide them.  And I suggest you reread my prior response because what you claim is not true, I didn't in any sense just write off functional information.  First, because I didn't dismiss the concept completely.  Second, because I gave reasons why the idea of functional information is problematic.  You need to confront those reasons instead of simply claiming that I dismissed functional information without justification as you have done.  I did not do any such thing.

The only reason natural processes produce anything is do to the force of the Creator behind them.  Natural processes are part of the implementation of the obvious design we find in living systems.  Without a creative force you have nothing.  Sheer chaos and randomness rather than all the order we find in the universe and in living systems.

The videos in my signature show how this manufacturing like plant works.  There is no doubt it is designed.
The LORD Exists: http://www.godandscience.org/
Intelligent Design (Short Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVkdQhNdzHU
Intelligent Design (Longer Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzj8iXiVDT8
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(January 15, 2019 at 3:12 pm)CDF47 Wrote: The only reason natural processes produce anything is do to the force of the Creator behind them.

It's me and my big penis pushing it. prove me wrong.
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(January 15, 2019 at 3:14 pm)LastPoet Wrote:
(January 15, 2019 at 3:12 pm)CDF47 Wrote: The only reason natural processes produce anything is do to the force of the Creator behind them.

It's me and my big penis pushing it. prove me wrong.

It can't be proven wrong since it is reality.
The LORD Exists: http://www.godandscience.org/
Intelligent Design (Short Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVkdQhNdzHU
Intelligent Design (Longer Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzj8iXiVDT8
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(January 15, 2019 at 3:16 pm)CDF47 Wrote:
(January 15, 2019 at 3:14 pm)LastPoet Wrote: It's me and my big penis pushing it. prove me wrong.

It can't be proven wrong since it is reality.

indeed.
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
Also, I am laughing my ass off.
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(January 15, 2019 at 3:14 pm)LastPoet Wrote:
(January 15, 2019 at 3:12 pm)CDF47 Wrote: The only reason natural processes produce anything is do to the force of the Creator behind them.

It's me and my big penis pushing it. prove me wrong.

You can believe whatever you like.  I don't care as long as you're not pushing your nonsense in schools or public offices.
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(January 15, 2019 at 3:31 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:
(January 15, 2019 at 3:14 pm)LastPoet Wrote: It's me and my big penis pushing it. prove me wrong.

You can believe whatever you like.  I don't care as long as you're not pushing your nonsense in schools or public offices.

Was I talking to you?
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(January 15, 2019 at 3:33 pm)LastPoet Wrote:
(January 15, 2019 at 3:31 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: You can believe whatever you like.  I don't care as long as you're not pushing your nonsense in schools or public offices.

Was I talking to you?

No, but I was talking to you.  Didn't realize that people needed special permission from your majesty to address you or your statements.
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(January 15, 2019 at 3:35 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: No, but I was talking to you.  Didn't realize that people needed special permission from your majesty to address you or your statements.

It is not majestic to refuse a chess match with a pigeon, It's having better things to do.
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(January 15, 2019 at 2:19 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:
(January 15, 2019 at 11:58 am)pocaracas Wrote: Would you like to do the maths yourself?
Or would you be happy with reading how it's done in a book or a published scientific paper?

I've read numerous scientific papers on it in the past, and I'm happy to read scientific papers on it today.  The thing is, it's not just one theory anymore.  It's multiple theories that keep changing.   That's the problem with human bias.  You'll get an increasing number of people saying they have a better explanation.  Quite honestly, I appreciate the beauty of personal opinion/bias, but I don't have time to visit everybody's personal take on something.   There are many things out there more relevant to my own life, so that's what I try to focus more of my precious time on.

I'm happy to consider the math you're suggesting, but please provide something that is conclusive if you choose to do so.  So far I've gotten two different numbers. 85 percent and 95 percent.  A 10 percent disparity in the universe's matter is quite a disparity.  Also, please keep in mind that I'm not a mathematician.  In college I took statistics and classes related to research methods, and as such I understand those aspect of applied mathematics.  If the math gets too complex, I may have to defer to a professional who can analyze it more readily.

Of course it's complex... not sure even I can follow it properly, but I'm not the one interested in redoing what they did, so... for a quick fix, this will have to do, and if you wish follow through the references:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model

And you may want to read what these guys say (again, following the references for more info):
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questi...ryonic-mat
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Spontaneous assembly of DNA from precursor molecules prior to life. Anomalocaris 4 1002 April 4, 2019 at 6:12 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Music and DNA tahaadi 4 1342 September 29, 2018 at 4:35 am
Last Post: GUBU
  Dr. Long proves life after death or no? Manga 27 7504 April 27, 2017 at 4:59 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  "DNA Labelling!" aka American Idiots Davka 28 7460 February 4, 2015 at 1:45 am
Last Post: Aractus
  A new atheist's theories on meta-like physical existence freedeepthink 14 3884 October 1, 2014 at 1:35 am
Last Post: freedeepthink
  Do the multiverse theories prove the existence of... Mudhammam 3 2200 January 12, 2014 at 12:03 pm
Last Post: Esquilax
  Yeti DNA sequenced Doubting Thomas 2 1471 October 17, 2013 at 7:17 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Science Proves God Pahu 3 1996 August 2, 2012 at 4:54 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  New Human DNA Strain Detected Minimalist 10 5049 July 27, 2012 at 7:24 pm
Last Post: popeyespappy
  Junk DNA and creationism little_monkey 0 2000 December 3, 2011 at 9:23 am
Last Post: little_monkey



Users browsing this thread: 18 Guest(s)