DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Amarok]

It's God's will as stated in Scripture.  The just and the un-just are in this together.

Which answers nothing

[Succubus]

Well that's a nice welcoming message.

Every post by your detractors in this three pronged clusterfuck of a thread is a welcome message. They are standard issue replies to fundie trolls.

I see your presence in the usual fundie haunts is now zero, why is that?
Why do you so much enjoy the relentless battering you receive here. Is it masochism, self flagellation? Or pehaps did you some time ago realize the story of Christianity is utter bollocks and your mind is in turmoil and what you are doing here is a silent cry for help. A painless Celice.

Or are you (in my firsts estimation) a boring fundie cunt troll?

Please reply soonest.

[Amarok]

So G.G's arguments inn a nutshell 

1. Because man made information is intelligently made . Therefore all information in intelligently made . This doesn't follow .

2. Poking holes in others theories instead of supporting his own  

3. Video spam without any actual engagement 

4. Asserting his religious statements and using weak logic

[Bucky Ball]

CDF47
The rain falls on the just and the un-just alike.

---

Love means never having to say you’re sorry

[The Grand Nudger]

---

You wouldn't have the first clue as to what my opinions were , to judge them one way or another.  This is what, the second time you've responded to my question without so much as approaching an answer to my question?

Do you not know when you first heard or saw that statement?  If so, so be it, but stop saying stupid shit..I don't care and I'm not asking.

I think I know enough of your opinions to know I totally and whole-heartedly disagree with them.

I strongly doubt that you know enough about anything to disagree in any other way, but...again, I'm not interested in that silly shit.  

Can you provide attribution for this whole-hearted but empty headed statement, or not?

[Amarok]

Why would that need a defense?  There has to be a good objection first

That's not the way logic works . Your statement is essentially it's right because it hasn't proven wrong .....Dumb .

---

So what did you just prove?

That one shouldn't rely on him to settle the evolution creation debate and that his ignorance of something doesn't help your case .

[vulcanlogician]

[Kitan Etos]

I was just poking fun at what a monstrosity this thread has become!

Indeed.

[Amarok]

[The Grand Nudger]

Yabut, "god" made the trees, too.  Ipso facto the information in the trees came from a mind, like all information, just not your mind.  It's the same ridiculous circle as before with design.

Show a person some undesigned thing, they swear it's also godesigned.  Show a person a designed thing that didn't come from any mind, they swear that the thing that did the designing came from a mind, and that that mind in turn came from a god.  All of this is obvious, ofc.  It's pointless to treat these beliefs as some sort of postulate that the holder will rationally adopt or abandon, because they simply aren't.  They have a history as part of a social movement, but beyond that, nada.  

Case in point...from the beginning of this thread (and any other "design" thread) a person can adopt a very accepting stance towards the putative claim.  That there is some design to life.  Sure, okay, we can take that and see that it's compatible, at least in principle, with the facts of biology.  We even understand the set of laws and circumstances that produced it - but this won't be acceptable to a creationist, that's not what they're talking about.  They don't think things were "designed" any more than they think "information" comes from minds.  Natural designs and information have nothing to do with what they're trying to express.  They think the answer to every question, and obviously so, is tinker goddidit.  

That's it, that's all.  The rest is fluff and filler.  LOL, a thousand pages of filler. There's no example of design or information that they haven't already decided somehow ultimately comes from tinkergod, because their belief that all things ultimately come from the tinker god is the only thing informing these assertions - none of which...despite constant protestations to the contrary, are actually informing their belief in the tinkergod.