Just how stupid were the ancient Israelites?

[Drich]

What I am saying illudues you

"Eludes," moron.

My momma always told me, If you going to challenge someone bigger/better than you are make sure you have all your shit on straight.

for instance:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/illude
to escape from : 

• glad to illude the burdens of the day
  
  
•  —George Crabbe †1832
  

picking nits out of my eye?

[The Grand Nudger]

---

God didn;t save them from any pharoahs.  

They most certainly did not do that..even though there was no moses and no saving them from any pharoahs..and they changed the way they lived under duress from the priestly source that told that lie to begin with.

In a way, indeed..and in a way, alot like yourself as well.

Actually; they kept to their old lifestyle, to the degree of calling the followers of the new religion "Christians".

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about...and you don;t even know that, lol.

I understand. Anything resembling a factual history of the culture involved is deleterious for your silly religion. This forces you to maintain the truth of absurd things left right and center. It;s not really your fault that islam is built atop two massive sets of lies...but it is your responsibility to make islam relevant apart from the borrowed ladder of it;s lowly origin.

[Angrboda]

"Eludes," moron.

My momma always told me, If you going to challenge someone bigger/better than you are make sure you have all your shit on straight.

for instance:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/illude
to escape from : 

• glad to illude the burdens of the day
  
  
•  —George Crabbe †1832
  

picking nits out of my eye?

Yes, and as we all know, you're an expert in archaic usages of the English language. That of course is the preferred explanation.

[Silver]

If what Drich says actually "illuded" us, we'd be theists.

[WinterHold]

---

Actually; they kept to their old lifestyle, to the degree of calling the followers of the new religion "Christians".

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about...and you don;t even know that, lol.

I understand.  Anything resembling a factual history of the culture involved is deleterious for your silly religion.  This forces you to maintain the truth of absurd things left right and center.  It;s not really your fault that islam is built atop two massive sets of lies...but it is your responsibility to make islam relevant apart from the borrowed ladder of it;s lowly origin.

Actually; you're just repeating the same broken record and call it a discussion. You don't want to discuss; you want to bash. So it's a closed road anyways.

From failing time after time to quote authentic, real evidence that supports what you say; we can quite see where the discussion is going. Insult after insult; bash after bash after bash. Repeat and rewind.

Evidence; please?

If not; play with someone else. Exhaustion tactics don't work with me.

[Crossless2.0]

My momma always told me, If you going to challenge someone bigger/better than you are make sure you have all your shit on straight.

for instance:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/illude
to escape from : 

• glad to illude the burdens of the day
  
  
•  —George Crabbe †1832
  

picking nits out of my eye?

Yes, and as we all know, you're an expert in archaic usages of the English language.  That of course is the preferred explanation.

Indeed. Drich's pretty use of English is egregious and silly -- even awful. And that is why you, Jor, should be more circumspect. I would hate for you to seem nice in your interactions with him here, and thereby pull a very public boner every time he ejaculates the truth.

That would be queer.

[The Grand Nudger]

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about...and you don;t even know that, lol.

I understand.  Anything resembling a factual history of the culture involved is deleterious for your silly religion.  This forces you to maintain the truth of absurd things left right and center.  It;s not really your fault that islam is built atop two massive sets of lies...but it is your responsibility to make islam relevant apart from the borrowed ladder of it;s lowly origin.

Actually; you're just repeating the same broken record and call it a discussion. You don't want to discuss; you want to bash. So it's a closed road anyways.

From failing time after time to quote authentic, real evidence that supports what you say; we can quite see where the discussion is going. Insult after insult; bash after bash after bash. Repeat and rewind.

Evidence; please?

If not; play with someone else. Exhaustion tactics don't work with me.

I know you have google.  Get your head out of magic book and look it up.

[WinterHold]

Actually; you're just repeating the same broken record and call it a discussion. You don't want to discuss; you want to bash. So it's a closed road anyways.

From failing time after time to quote authentic, real evidence that supports what you say; we can quite see where the discussion is going. Insult after insult; bash after bash after bash. Repeat and rewind.

Evidence; please?

If not; play with someone else. Exhaustion tactics don't work with me.

I know you have google.  Get your head out of magic book and look it up.

I use both: and that's what is awesome about the Quran: you can read it, and still use search engines to research other stuff.

Now; back to the evidence. Do you have any?
You can use google.

[The Grand Nudger]

-and thats why it;s pointless to discuss history with you.  You don;t want to.  You;d rather argue with me. I can;t make you give a shit, or do your own due diligence.

[Drich]

My momma always told me, If you going to challenge someone bigger/better than you are make sure you have all your shit on straight.

for instance:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/illude
to escape from : 

• glad to illude the burdens of the day
  
  
•  —George Crabbe †1832
  

picking nits out of my eye?

Yes, and as we all know, you're an expert in archaic usages of the English language.  That of course is the preferred explanation.

indeed when I say illude the fault is mine for misleading (intensional or not) the poor sap who missed my point.

 when you say "elude" you are saying the poor sap is too stupid to understand the meaning of the text.

I was giving kem the benefit of the doubt and rephrased as he seem to gt everything else, just took the wrong meaning on the terms i used.

---

Yes, and as we all know, you're an expert in archaic usages of the English language.  That of course is the preferred explanation.

Indeed. Drich's pretty use of English is egregious and silly -- even awful. And that is why you, Jor, should be more circumspect. I would hate for you to seem nice in your interactions with him here, and thereby pull a very public boner every time he ejaculates the truth.

That would be queer.

boo-ya!