He doesn't even say why he can't be bothered posting all the other references that he claims to have.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 22, 2024, 8:26 am
Thread Rating:
The brain
|
OP, firstly atheists wouldn't be in trouble as we (speaking for myself) do not hold onto faith and belief in one particular view point. If science shows what you are claiming with rationality and evidence, I would accept it. Unlike theists there is room for growth in knowledge. Science can't "turn on us"
Secondly, you failed. (May 31, 2018 at 4:28 pm)Drich Wrote: However many 'scientists' believe there is too much growing evidence [snip] to maintain that we are contain only within our brain Unsubstantiated claim. And quite frankly, utterly wrong as well. (May 31, 2018 at 4:28 pm)Drich Wrote: So the beggs the question where is our consciousness stored? the scientific answer is in an alternate dimension, meaning we die here and wake up there... Wrong. If what you were saying what true then the scientific answer would be "We don't know". (June 1, 2018 at 5:25 am)Mathilda Wrote:Drich also assumes consciousness is one thing..(May 31, 2018 at 4:28 pm)Drich Wrote: However many 'scientists' believe there is too much growing evidence [snip] to maintain that we are contain only within our brain
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
RE: The brain
June 1, 2018 at 8:34 am
(This post was last modified: June 1, 2018 at 8:34 am by Homeless Nutter.)
(May 31, 2018 at 4:28 pm)Drich Wrote: Looks like you'se guys is in trouble... looks like you precious has turned on you or rather 'science' latest theory is make room for the soul... [...] Looks like you is back on crack...
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
Ooh I recognise that avatar LostLocke. I've been considering buying the monster manual this month for a one-shot.
Since Schwartz explicitly brings up the subject of his experiments with mediums in the video, I think the following is relevant. The points made in the article may not all obtain, but I think the flaws in his work justify discounting his claims about mediums and their ability to speak to the dead.
Quote:Professor Gary Schwartz makes revolutionary claims that he has provided competent scientific evidence for survival of consciousness and—even more extraordinary—that mediums can actually communicate with the dead. He is badly mistaken. The research he presents is flawed, and in numerous ways. Probably no other extended program in psychical research deviates so much from accepted norms of scientific methodology as this one. (May 31, 2018 at 4:28 pm)Drich Wrote: WFT are you guys going to do if we can 'ping/verify this alternate universe? What's this 'we' business? This is your claim so you ping the fucking server and get back with the results. Show your work so that we can taunt you a second time.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)