| Poll: Do you support Wikileaks This poll is closed. |
|||
| Absolutely For | 7 | 31.82% | |
| Generally For | 11 | 50.00% | |
| Undecided / Neutral | 4 | 18.18% | |
| Generally Against | 0 | 0% | |
| Absolutely Against | 0 | 0% | |
| Total | 22 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
Wikileaks - For or Against?
|
 (December 9, 2010 at 6:50 am)Tiberius Wrote: Anyone else remember the days when WikiLeaks actually had a Wiki? Yeah, I read somewhere that they streamlined it down to harden it against DDoS attacks.
"How is it that a lame man does not annoy us while a lame mind does? Because a lame man recognizes that we are walking straight, while a lame mind says that it is we who are limping." - Pascal
 (December 9, 2010 at 7:52 am)Jaysyn Wrote:(December 9, 2010 at 6:50 am)Tiberius Wrote: Anyone else remember the days when WikiLeaks actually had a Wiki? That action makes absolutely no sense  I think it was their ego.
.
 (December 9, 2010 at 5:16 am)Tiberius Wrote: I'm neutral, partly because of my line of study. I think exposing security flaws is good, but I'm not too happy with all the lives at risk by Wikileaks' behaviour. When I read the article about the "insurance" package it specifically stated that no redactions of names was inclusive and indicated that steps were taken before the previous download to take out names and other ID information of people who could get hurt or dead by the disclosures. Which only makes sense, if you expose regular folks doing their jobs no one is going to support you.
The world is a dangerous place to live - not because of the people who are evil but because of the people who don't do anything about it.
- Albert Einstein
Breaking down a democratic process between hostile groups costs lives too, that could potentially happen.
.
RE: Wikileaks - For or Against?
December 9, 2010 at 10:02 am
(This post was last modified: December 9, 2010 at 10:19 am by lilyannerose.)
(December 9, 2010 at 9:53 am)theVOID Wrote: Breaking down a democratic process between hostile groups costs lives too, that could potentially happen. Right now I'm for the leaks as I think it's important with so much going on with the economy and the depressed jobs market and the over all sense many have of being out of control of their lives, I think psychologically it's good for people to see that there are those who are fighting back. It gives people a sense that there are ways to be heard and there are means to make the captains and the kings uneasy. If it will be worth it in the end? I don't know. Speaking in the now, I think people need to feel that power has vulnerability. The Bolivian government is now hosting WikiLeaks http://wikileaks.vicepresidencia.gob.bo/,
The world is a dangerous place to live - not because of the people who are evil but because of the people who don't do anything about it.
- Albert Einstein |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| WikiLeaks publishes searchable database of almost 20,000 emails from DNC. | Tiberius | 202 | 19737 |
July 29, 2016 at 8:46 am Last Post: Tiberius |
|
| Stratfor E-mails Wikileaks | paintpooper | 44 | 13283 |
March 1, 2012 at 1:04 pm Last Post: The Grand Nudger |
|
| What ever happened to that Wikileaks anti-BoA material? | Autumnlicious | 2 | 1358 |
January 27, 2012 at 3:55 pm Last Post: Doubting Thomas |
|
| WikiLeaks: Saudi Royal Welfare Program Revealed | HeyItsZeus | 10 | 4897 |
March 1, 2011 at 9:42 am Last Post: KichigaiNeko |
|
| Wikileaks news | theVOID | 15 | 5309 |
December 15, 2010 at 10:47 pm Last Post: Jaysyn |
|
| Wikileaks and the USA diplomatic cables | Ashendant | 75 | 19269 |
December 11, 2010 at 6:56 pm Last Post: Oldandeasilyconfused |
|
