How messed up are Trump Supporters?

[Amarok]

The recent Rasmussen poll has black support for Trump at 29% (up from 15% a year ago).
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/201...at_29.html

Proof the stupidity does not see race 

Does that mean 29% of blacks are Uncle Tom house n*****s?

No only some of them are the rest are just stupid along with all white people who supported him .

[Angrboda]

[The Industrial Atheist]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powe...207955fca/

As we explained recently here at The Health 202, instituting work requirements in non-expansion states means the absolute poorest Americans, who are largely single mothers, would be caught in a catch-22 where working could earn them too much money to qualify for Medicaid, but not working would also make them ineligible for the benefits.

. . . . . . . .

The state projects the population who will fall into the catch-22 category and be eligible to receive the additional 24 months of coverage is only 1,280 people, or, by Alker's calculations, 2 percent of the parents or caretakers who have Medicaid. Alker said the administration's contention has been that Medicaid should be "preserved for the truly needy."

"That’s exactly who is hit by these proposals," she told me. "If they were to approve one of these [non-expansion states] it would really lay bare the hypocrisy of what they’re saying."

I put money on the Republicans knowing this.

[Angrboda]

[Amarok]

[Crossless2.0]

[John V]

Yet another deplorable decision by our resident stable genius. Did he even pay attention in Econ. 101 and 102? I find it hard to believe he could have.

Canadian government subsidized Canadian paper manufacturers, giving them an unfair advantage relative to US paper manufacturers.

US imposes a tariff on Canadian paper to level the playing field.

Why is that deplorable?

[Whateverist]

Yet another deplorable decision by our resident stable genius. Did he even pay attention in Econ. 101 and 102? I find it hard to believe he could have.

Canadian government subsidized Canadian paper manufacturers, giving them an unfair advantage relative to US paper manufacturers.

US imposes a tariff on Canadian paper to level the playing field.

Why is that deplorable?

Well of course it isn't deplorable at all inside your tribal nation.  But in the wider world community it is simply narrow, short sighted and mutually destructive.  Can you explain to me again how Jesus stood for me-me-me-mine and distrust of the stranger, or do you just play a xtian on an atheist site for the yucks?

[Crossless2.0]

Yet another deplorable decision by our resident stable genius. Did he even pay attention in Econ. 101 and 102? I find it hard to believe he could have.

Canadian government subsidized Canadian paper manufacturers, giving them an unfair advantage relative to US paper manufacturers.

US imposes a tariff on Canadian paper to level the playing field.

Why is that deplorable?

I'm a hell of a lot more concerned about the well being of what remains of our print news industry (especially at the local and regional levels) than I am with U.S. paper manufacturers. The increased costs will squeeze papers even more than they already are.

[Anomalocaris]