Is Harassment of Public Figures Acceptable: Your Sincere Opinion

[Neo-Scholastic]

[Minimalist]

In a word, "Yes."  As long as it is non-violent these cocksuckers who are running the country into the mud should be confronted over it.

[Amarok]

Let's rewrite this 

Is Holding Public Figures Responsible For Willfully  Supporting Awful Things In their Capacity As Public Figures Acceptable: Your Sincere Opinion

The answer in that context is yes

[Jackie]

In a word, "Yes."  As long as it is non-violent these cocksuckers who are running the country into the mud should be confronted over it.

I wouldn't use that word, because the false martyrs will use that to falsely play victim. I do agree that public figures, ESPECIALLY politicians should be confronted.

[vorlon13]

No.

And once indicted after an oft delayed forensic audit, Maxine Waters is going to be screaming SHE'S the one being harassed.

[downbeatplumb]

How else do you complain?

Taking a knee is verboten.

[Aroura]

Harassment? Absolutely not. Not of anyone. Same with sexist or racist comments. Not OK.

Insulting? Rude? Showing of contempt? Derision? Disrespect? Yes. Absolutely. All of them. If you want to say Obama was a war mongering, retarded ass clown, that is absolutely within bounds. Want to get on twitter and call Tom Cruise a loon? Fine. Go to an actors site and tell them you didn't like their latest movie? That's ok too. Going to someone's twitter and telling them to kill themselves because they ruined your favorite movie franchise? That's harassment. You crossed the line

That being said, if a person is themselves using bullying behavior, people have a right to stand up to it. Standing up to a bully is not harassment of a bully. Although after seeing how often admins in schools back up the bullies and blame the victims, I see that's a pretty chronic issue in our society. Defending the bully, I mean.

[Jackie]

How else do you complain?

Taking a knee is verboten.

PAPERS, LET ME SEE YOUR PAPERS!

NINE, NINE, TEN, ELEVEN AND 12!

[vulcanlogician]

My civil side urges me to say that there are many weapons that belong in an activist's arsenal, but harassment of individuals isn't one of them. These people didn't put Trump in charge. Your real problem is with the basket of deplorables. In one sense, the folks listed in the OP are merely doing their jobs. Their personal lives have been affected by professional choices. Part of me says that this isn't right. There ought to be "turf"upon which it is appropriate for activists to fight these battles, and otherwise, these people ought to be left alone.

But in another sense, the choice to be a figure in the public sphere is one that has private consequences. They had to be aware of what they were getting themselves into. Through their work, they affect the private lives of millions; it's a two way street.

If they were to drop out of the public sphere, and dedicate themselves to different pursuits, they would get their privacy back soon enough. So in the end, it's up to them.

[Anomalocaris]