Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 5:15 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Banning face coverings
#1
Banning face coverings
This is a general discussion about whether or not banning face coverings in public is a good thing. This obviously is primarily concerned with the veil worn over the face by some Muslim women, although I would hope that any law would be across the board about face coverings in general.

France has banned this, and recently Denmark has too. (My wife informed me, I don't watch the news very much.) I used to be of the opinion that it should just have a blanket ban here in England, but I've come to realize the issue is much more complex.

It's clear to me that no women ends up wearing this of her own free choice. It just doesn't happen. I appreciate many women feel they are making a free choice, and would find me saying this hugely patronizing. I understand that. But since we're on an atheist forum here, us atheists probably agree that almost every case is going to be the result of indoctrination into Islam. Virtually no non-Muslims decide it would be a good idea to cover their faces up, and we know that Muslims are going to be coerced, if not downright forced, into wearing them. If you're told about how God wants you to from an early age and this is drilled into the programming of your brain, the idea that you're freely choosing to wear it is quite ridiculous.

Of course, I see such women as victims. Sometimes, they are going to be part of communities where they will be punished for not wearing it. Sometimes, it will be more liberal, but they'll still face some sort of dishonor if they don't comply. Sometimes there may be no external pressure left at all, but we all know that the "choice" to continue has been implanted in the first place.

A ban would make including this in indoctrination harder. This would, I hope, be a benefit to all women yet to be born into Islam. But the price would probably be heavy for all the women currently wearing them. My wife pointed out to me that even in England, there are some extreme Muslim subcommunities that the police are frightened to enter. Enforcing such a ban here would be very hard, and if it was done, it could result in women becoming prisoners in their home. They might not be let out in public at all.

I'll be curious to see how it works out in Denmark, and if anyone has any experience or information about how it's all played out in France, I'd be interested to hear. I certainly think that when there are laws already in place for security measures, such as in airports, there should be no religious exemption. But pushing a ban further than that is an issue I'm much divided on. On one hand, I want people to be free to do whatever they want, as long as they don't hurt people. On the other, I'm all too aware it is a result of religious oppression, and it can put up barriers.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#2
RE: Banning face coverings
What about when men cover their face like Janists

[Image: cVElpBCW_o.jpg]

I mean that actually looks good and I wish all religious people would tie their mouths like that because they don't have anything smart to say.
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
Reply
#3
RE: Banning face coverings
Let's compromise and just gag them all.
Reply
#4
RE: Banning face coverings
You know, back when women were protesting their right to vote, a significant number of women polled claimed that they did not want that right. It's something called internalized oppression. I would agree that a similar phenomenon is present with those who say they want to wear headdresses and the like.

But is it fair to ban them outright? It would certainly seem to go against freedom of religion and expression that US protects under the First Amendment. On that basis alone I wouldn't agree with a ban.
[Image: nL4L1haz_Qo04rZMFtdpyd1OZgZf9NSnR9-7hAWT...dc2a24480e]
Reply
#5
RE: Banning face coverings
Banning it outright I disagree with, restricting it in certain circumstances such has a court house or a airport I can support.
     “A man isn't tiny or giant enough to defeat anything” Yukio Mishima


Reply
#6
RE: Banning face coverings
Yeah, in the US, banning an expression of religion would be simply unconstitutional. I would not support that at all.

I don't think there is a situation where banning them in any context would make anyone safer. It may make people feel less uncomfortable, but you'd have to show me something that would prove something like that.

I don't like them and I think they're a part of a system of oppression. But if it doesn't hurt others and women aren't required to wear them I don't see any good reason to outlaw them.

EDIT: to be clear---the reason France and Denmark ban face coverings is because of xenophobia---to deter immigration. Europe is in the middle of an immigration crisis, and populism responds predictably.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great

PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Reply
#7
RE: Banning face coverings
(August 17, 2018 at 9:01 am)robvalue Wrote: Virtually no non-Muslims decide it would be a good idea to cover their faces up,

Pussy Riot would beg to differ.





Also, there was a brief stage when I used to go out with a full face covering, but that was mostly because A) I was forced to use my bike because I didn't yet have my drivers' license and I needed to go to class, and B) Chicago's winters are fucking brutal. I managed to miss exactly three classes (out of about 32) that semester: one because the school declared a snow day, another because I injured my coccyx and, if it's painful to switch between standing and sitting, it's not practical to go to class, and the third because I was in Vegas (with the teacher). At the time, I learned about the laws against face covering in France. Fortunately, it looks like the climate in Paris or even Copenhagen doesn't really necessitate such dramatic necessities.

In addition, on occasion, I go out wearing a surgical mask, but that's only when I'm under the weather and have to go somewhere. Earlier in the year, I had ulcers on my tonsils, and the same day I went to the doctor's office, I needed to turn in my midterm for my Income Tax Accounting class. I ended up wearing the mask and the teacher congratulated me for at least being considerate.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.

[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]

I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Reply
#8
RE: Banning face coverings
This wasn't banned.

[Image: jacko--124601691697242200.jpg?itok=1iNp_ypv]

Or this.

[Image: 15063255481920.jpg]

How much of the proposed ban is based in fear?
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
#9
RE: Banning face coverings
[Image: 40962907321_90161c562f_b.jpg]


Fuck all religions.
Reply
#10
RE: Banning face coverings
They'll have to take my keffiyeh out of my cold dead hands.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Banning religious teachings for minors Dystopia 15 2300 July 5, 2014 at 8:36 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Alleged Contradictions - Seeing God's Face Daystar 15 10256 November 9, 2008 at 10:24 am
Last Post: Kyuuketsuki



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)