Is WLC done debating?

[Jehanne]

[robvalue]

Wouldn't that be great.

[I_am_not_mafia]

Maybe he just got bored saying the same shit again and again?

[robvalue]

Or he's not making enough money by doing so now.

[Abaddon_ire]

Wouldn't that be great.

Yeah, but I doubt it will last. He may simply be developing his next "killer" argument for "dawg" to unleash upon an unsuspecting world. Time was when he thought Kalam was it. That got trashed. For a while he flirted with Sye Ten Bruggencate and his nutty presuppositionalist crap. I suspect he is simply brewing yet another failure of an argument.

That will also get trashed in turn, whatever it turns out to be.

Of all the apologists I have had the misfortune to happen upon, WLC is the most slimy abject liar for jebus that I have ever seen. Although in fairness, it is difficult to rank them. Hovind x2. Ham. Banana man. The list is endless.

To be fair, they are not all like that. Lennox is at least rational, although wrong.

[Angrboda]

He's still writing books, so he's not completely silent.

[Minimalist]

Maybe he just got bored saying the same shit again and again?

Fuckheads like him never get tired of saying the same shit again and again.

[Jehanne]

Or he's not making enough money by doing so now.

That's my thought, also; if WLC would start-up his debate circuit again, such would be bad for business.  It makes more sense, financially, for him just to coast on the momentum that he built-up over the years.

[robvalue]

That makes sense. The opposition he faces has become stronger and stronger, more people are seeing through his crap, and he's just stuck with the same stale nonsense.