|
I thought your god was keeping you safe
|
 RE: I thought your god was keeping you safe
April 18, 2019 at 7:56 am
(This post was last modified: April 18, 2019 at 8:00 am by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
Seriously. I'm unaware of a rule blanket-banning the use of certain words. If it's going to be an issue, maybe we should create such a rule.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
 RE: I thought your god was keeping you safe
April 18, 2019 at 10:17 am
(This post was last modified: April 18, 2019 at 10:23 am by LadyForCamus.)
I believe that word, by itself, qualifies as hate speech regardless of anyone’s subjective intentions. And, I think it’s fair to say that hate speech is a violation of the prime directive.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken. RE: I thought your god was keeping you safe
April 18, 2019 at 11:09 am
(This post was last modified: April 18, 2019 at 11:13 am by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(April 18, 2019 at 10:17 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: I believe that word, by itself, qualifies as hate speech regardless of anyone’s subjective intentions. And, I think it’s fair to say that hate speech is a violation of the prime directive. Suppose I were to post, 'Mark Twain's Huckleberry Finn contains more than 200 uses of the n-word', but substituted the actual word for the euphemism. Would you consider that a violation? Or suppose I did the same with the sentence 'No one deserves to be called "n-word" '. Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
This thread certainly went sideways.
So rap music videos are banned?
(April 18, 2019 at 12:07 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: So rap music videos are banned? ^This. It isn't that words are used, it's how they are used. But I'll be a good lad and play along. Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
LastPoet
 Leader of the gang of jerkoffs(tm)  Religious Views: L'Uomo verrà portato dalla sua creazione
Well, this escalated quickly.
So it did. I blame myself for letting Drich bait me into using the word. Mea maxima culpa.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
(April 18, 2019 at 11:09 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(April 18, 2019 at 10:17 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: I believe that word, by itself, qualifies as hate speech regardless of anyone’s subjective intentions. And, I think it’s fair to say that hate speech is a violation of the prime directive. Alright, fair point on both of the examples above, however, neither are comparable to what was going on in this thread. He
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken. (April 18, 2019 at 12:30 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(April 18, 2019 at 11:09 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Suppose I were to post, 'Mark Twain's Huckleberry Finn contains more than 200 uses of the n-word', but substituted the actual word for the euphemism. Would you consider that a violation? Or suppose I did the same with the sentence 'No one deserves to be called "n-word" '. Thank you, and I don't disagree. As I said, it's all on me. Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
