[Serious] Time to embrace Islam!

[The Grand Nudger]

I honestly don't think that you could reason with anyone. It's just not your thing.

[R00tKiT]

You nutballs are dense.  I already have replaced my factory standard parts where I can and where is needed and where I can afford it.  I've got more to switch out still.  I'm willing to be that you have too.  Probably didn't come from the showroom with your current immune system, at least.  I guess that's a bit of a gamble, since shia and sunni nuttery strongly correlates with anti-vax nuttery..but I'm willing to take it.

I'm not the person complaining, lol..that's you lot bitching about your own pornographic magic books.  I take it for granted that the author of pornography..which would be god, would be comfortable with pornography.  I don't mind it either.  Hell..I can't find anything filthy or unclean about the human body whatsoever, and I question the lucidity of any person who believes that a god created us some way x only to decide that he didn't like x.

You don't like some x, you think it's filthy, atlas has his list too.  God, if god created this world and life in this world..coated the floor, wall, and ceiling with semen and blood.  Bold interior design theme.

Again, you're complaining of things that don't exist. Nowhere in the Qur'an menstruation or sperm are considered filthy. It's tempting to recourse to creating a straw man when clearly you're not (at all?) well-versed in the Koranic text.

And whenever you run out of objections to Islam people don't just bring out the Sunni/Shia card, sectarian tension is a much more complicated problem than just a theoretical difference between what each sect believes in.

[WinterHold]

I honestly don't think that you could reason with anyone.  It's just not your thing.

By reason; do you mean abandoning my point and accept yours?
Because you didn't convince me, so I can't adopt your suggested point.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Again, you're complaining of things that don't exist. Nowhere in the Qur'an menstruation or sperm are considered filthy. It's tempting to recourse to creating a straw man when clearly you're not (at all?) well-versed in the Koranic text.

Nah you just assume your he only one who really understands it 

And whenever you run out of objections to Islam people don't just bring out the Sunni/Shia card, sectarian tension is a much more complicated problem than just a theoretical difference between what each sect believes in.

Nah all his objections wok pointing out your wacky  cult can't deiced what's correct is just he cherry on top

---

By reason; do you mean abandoning my point and accept yours?

Nah he means accept reality 

Because you didn't convince me, so I can't adopt your suggested point.

Wow your not convinced  by reason .No surprise there .

[The Grand Nudger]

Take it up with your boy Kloro, he's the one who thinks that a gods holy book wouldn't have that sort of filth in it.

Atlas, do you need a dictionary for christmas, or?

[WinterHold]

Because you didn't convince me, so I can't adopt your suggested point.

Wow your not convinced  by reason .No surprise there .

You can quote whom you reply to; because your post is very misleading. There is a button under any post named "reply"; use it to send a notification to the op of the post. The way you replied is not the way to debate.

Second of all; you are debating all kinds of different religions. It's your problem if what you see logical is illogical to me.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Wow your not convinced  by reason .No surprise there .

You can quote whom you reply to; because your post is very misleading. There is a button under any post named "reply"; use it to send a notification to the op of the post. This is not the way to debate. It's a very bad thing to mix my posts with the posts of the OP for example; I don't share my views with him. So it's better not to waste my time.

Second of all; you are debating all kinds of different religions. It's your problem if what you see logical is illogical to me.

1. No it is not .I posted what you said in context .And i'm not debating you i'm comment on your post .Nor did i mix your posts nor would anyone reading confuse he two .So don' waste my time with irrelevant complaints .

2.No i'm debating one irrational hydra with many heads  .I don't have a problem i'm afraid you do .

[WinterHold]

1. No it is not .I posted what you said in context .And i'm not debating you i'm comment on your post .Nor did i mix your posts nor would anyone reading confuse he two .So don' waste my time with irrelevant complaints .

No. It's a forum where people "debate and discuss". If you're neither debating nor discussing save yourself the trouble.

2.No i'm debating one irrational hydra with many heads  .I don't have a problem i'm afraid you do .

There is a troll in this post, we all know who he is, he is not fooling anybody. I don't have the time to troll members, the troll here is well known.

[The Architect Of Fate]

1. No it is not .I posted what you said in context .And i'm not debating you i'm comment on your post .Nor did i mix your posts nor would anyone reading confuse he two .So don' waste my time with irrelevant complaints .

No. It's a forum where people "debate and discuss". If you're neither debating nor discussing save yourself the trouble.

2.No i'm debating one irrational hydra with many heads  .I don't have a problem i'm afraid you do .

There is a troll in this post, we all know who he is, he is not fooling anybody. I don't have the time to troll members, the troll here is well known.

1. It can be a place to do that .It an also be a place to comment on comments .And no commenting is no trouble at all.

2.Nope no troll

[R00tKiT]

Well if you somehow have a way to define what god is, I'd be ecstatic to hear it - you'd be the first person in human history who is able to do so.

The whole problem with you people is that you overcomplicate matters, when things are and should be simple.  A coherent definition of god would be like this : the unique immortal, omnipotent and omniscient being.

Why did I define God like that? Because it's the only interesting definition. Any mortal being will cease to exist and won't interfere in any way with any creature nor will meet us in an eventual afterlife.

And you seem, like everyone here, to be overly repugnant of theology, which is your former religion's fault, and not any other religion.

The two aren't exactly mutually exclusive, are they? No, they are not. I can say that I do not assume or believe god exists and also say that I'm unsure, meaning that, at some point, my view can change, based on new evidence being presented.

edit: And no, they are not the same thing.

Saying no is never an answer to anything buddy. Not assuming (just as not knowing) something exists doesn't mean you're certain you won't change your mind later. Again, you're arbitrarily objecting to any clarification I try to make.

And how do you know that the prophet "did more than just claim?" Did you read it in the Quran, by any chance?

Did you spend some time looking up what the Isnad is all about, or just cannot help the urge of accusing us of circularity?