God is a Mass Murderer

[WinterHold]

you are a "debater"; a bot, electronic fly. You just keep repeating yourself over and over

Atheists must repeat their arguments because theists are extremely slow learners, so atheists have to repeat them same explanations over and over again, like that there's no evidence that Muhammad really flew on a winged horse or that Jesus didn't walk on water or that Snow White didn't really resurrect.

If someone claims 1+1=3 there isn't many different ways to explain them that 1+1=2 which is exactly the case when some theist claims his or her god's fairytales are true.

The law of gravity is written by a theist, general relativity is written by a pantheistic God believer. So stop monopolizing science,  bot, it's really sad and make you look stupid.

[Belacqua]

[Fake Messiah]

Atheists must repeat their arguments because theists are extremely slow learners, so atheists have to repeat them same explanations over and over again, like that there's no evidence that Muhammad really flew on a winged horse or that Jesus didn't walk on water or that Snow White didn't really resurrect.

If someone claims 1+1=3 there isn't many different ways to explain them that 1+1=2 which is exactly the case when some theist claims his or her god's fairytales are true.

The law of gravity is written by a theist, general relativity is written by a pantheistic God believer. So stop monopolizing science,  bot, it's really sad and make you look stupid.

WinterHold is trolling again. He is completely twisting my words.

[The Architect Of Fate]

---

The law of gravity is written by a theist, general relativity is written by a pantheistic God believer. So stop monopolizing science,  bot, it's really sad and make you look stupid.

WinterHold is trolling again. He is completely twisting my words.

And Beel right on schedule backs up his twisting

---

Atheists must repeat their arguments because theists are extremely slow learners, so atheists have to repeat them same explanations over and over again, like that there's no evidence that Muhammad really flew on a winged horse or that Jesus didn't walk on water or that Snow White didn't really resurrect.

If someone claims 1+1=3 there isn't many different ways to explain them that 1+1=2 which is exactly the case when some theist claims his or her god's fairytales are true.

The law of gravity is written by a theist, general relativity is written by a pantheistic God believer. So stop monopolizing science,  bot, it's really sad and make you look stupid.

Way to dishonestly twist what fake was saying

---

Oh and quoting off a list of scientists who happened to be clergy no more refutes the idea that science and religion . Than YEC pulling the same trick to say there idea's are not in conflict with modern science . It's a very poor argument and is also very selective .

[Deesse23]

stop monopolizing science

I post the following list every now and then, just to counter simple-minded people who think that religion is opposed to science. The original is from Wikipedia.

The following is a list of Catholic clergymen in good standing with the church who made significant contributions to math or science. (This list includes only names beginning A through R -- the full list is too long for a single post.) And of course the list of non-clergy Christians who contributed would be far longer.

• Deesse23: Bels long list of persons completely irrelevant to MFs original post. I removed the spam, because my reply would exceed the 2^16 character limit
  

What matters is if you can back up your claim, not if you have addiitonal (unfounded) beliefs/claims. It doenst matter which physical laws were brought up by people who had otherwise silly beliefs (beliefs they could and did not back up).

Thats why Atlass (once again) posted irerlevant BS. It doest matter what other BS (like alchemy) Newton believed in. What mattered is that he could back up his claims about gravity.

This is in acordance with FMs original post, which was about claims and backing them up, not what additonal BS people believe in (and in addition about the necessity that some basic stuff needs to be explained to some people over and over again, and the inability to comprehend whats explained is not on the side of the person doing the explanation. If that was the case all ignorant students could accuse their teachers for their own lack of ability to understand what just had been explained to them).

If someone claims 1+1=3 there isn't many different ways to explain them that 1+1=2 which is exactly the case when some theist claims his or her god's fairytales are true.

I am not surprised that Atlass failed again. He fails on the most basic logic, reason, history and science, on a very regular basis. I am surprised however someone so well versed in phiilosophy like you didnt know that.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Moderator Notice
note to Belacqua: your list of religious scientists was placed in hide tags due to the length of the quoted material (and because I couldn’t be bothered to look for the url). This is NOT a warning, but Forum guidelines ask that you use a link instead of copy/pasting such a large amount of material from an outside source.

Boru

[AniKoferBo]

Lot's nameless wife looks back, and god turns her into a pillar of salt
genesis 19:26 But his wife looked back from behind him, and she became a pillar of salt.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Lot's nameless wife looks back, and god turns her into a pillar of salt
genesis 19:26 But his wife looked back from behind him, and she became a pillar of salt.

Ok, you know that didn’t really happen, right?

Boru

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Lot's nameless wife looks back, and god turns her into a pillar of salt
genesis 19:26 But his wife looked back from behind him, and she became a pillar of salt.

Ok, you know that didn’t really happen, right?

Boru

Fat lot you know!

This pillar of rock is the actual pillar of salt that was Lot's wife!

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

I stand corrected. And a little sad.

Boru