Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 23, 2024, 12:54 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
(May 27, 2020 at 8:45 pm)Succubus#2 Wrote:
(May 27, 2020 at 8:41 pm)Belacqua Wrote: As I already wrote, I don't disagree with any part.

Then you agree there is no such thing as the supernatural?

Dr. Carroll doesn't say anything about the supernatural in his speech.

I already wrote this. Are you reading carefully?
Reply
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
(May 27, 2020 at 8:51 pm)Belacqua Wrote:
(May 27, 2020 at 8:45 pm)Succubus#2 Wrote: Then you agree there is no such thing as the supernatural?

Dr. Carroll doesn't say anything about the supernatural in his speech.

I already wrote this. Are you reading carefully?

He didn't need to, the supernatural in all its various flavours do not, cannot, exist.
None of this is real.
Miserable Bastard.
Reply
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
I don't think that Bel is capable of realizing how he managed to screw this all up. All he wanted to do was toss out his usual canned gripes, but the bridges he picked to move from one tired assertion to the next were fraught with difficulty and self referential incoherence.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
(May 27, 2020 at 8:56 pm)Succubus#2 Wrote:
(May 27, 2020 at 8:51 pm)Belacqua Wrote: Dr. Carroll doesn't say anything about the supernatural in his speech.

I already wrote this. Are you reading carefully?

He didn't need to, the supernatural in all its various flavours do not cannot exist.

Please demonstrate that this claim is true.

I asked you to do this before, but you didn't respond.
Reply
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
-case in point.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
(May 27, 2020 at 8:57 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: I don't think that Bel is capable of realizing how he managed to screw this all up.  All he wanted to do was toss out his usual canned gripes, but the bridges he picked to move from one tired assertion to the next were fraught with difficulty and self referential incoherence.

Or perhaps he's just asking questions?

[Image: g0cq6t47ud141.jpg]
Miserable Bastard.
Reply
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
(May 27, 2020 at 9:05 pm)Succubus#2 Wrote: Or perhaps he's just asking questions?

I asked you a question, twice, which you aren't answering.
Reply
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
(May 27, 2020 at 9:07 pm)Belacqua Wrote:
(May 27, 2020 at 9:05 pm)Succubus#2 Wrote: Or perhaps he's just asking questions?

I asked you a question, twice, which you aren't answering.

And I explained twice.
Put the shovel down.
Miserable Bastard.
Reply
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
(May 27, 2020 at 9:09 pm)Succubus#2 Wrote:
(May 27, 2020 at 9:07 pm)Belacqua Wrote: I asked you a question, twice, which you aren't answering.

And I explained twice.
Put the shovel down.

You have asserted, twice, that the supernatural is impossible.

You appear to support this with a video which doesn't address the issue at all.

If you are happy making unsupported assertions and avoiding the burden of proof, I'll stop asking.
Reply
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
(May 27, 2020 at 9:09 pm)Succubus#2 Wrote:
(May 27, 2020 at 9:07 pm)Belacqua Wrote: I asked you a question, twice, which you aren't answering.

And I explained twice.
Put the shovel down.
That's Bels bread and butter 

Spew a heap of word salad . Get challenged on it . Spew more word salad . Get challenged on it . 


[Image: nNOIXY.gif]

And down down down he goes
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is life more satisfying as an atheist or religionist? FrustratedFool 96 7818 November 10, 2023 at 11:13 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  No soul? No free will and no responsibility then, yet the latter's essential... Duty 33 5253 August 26, 2020 at 4:35 pm
Last Post: HappySkeptic
  His wish sounds familiar purplepurpose 1 1037 November 16, 2017 at 4:55 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Ugh, how come I, an atheist, have the ability to ACT more "Christian" than...... maestroanth 7 2013 April 9, 2016 at 7:46 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Religious kids more likely to be cunts than atheist ones Napoléon 12 3218 November 6, 2015 at 5:50 pm
Last Post: paulpablo
  More atheist men than women? Catholic_Lady 203 36229 July 9, 2015 at 9:12 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Are Deists more like theists or Atheist? Twisted 37 10411 May 28, 2015 at 10:18 am
Last Post: comet
  Why do I find mysticism so appealing? JaceDeanLove 22 7371 December 24, 2014 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Mystic
  Do we need more Atheist books for kids? process613 43 8836 November 30, 2014 at 4:14 am
Last Post: fr0d0
  Panpsychism is not as crazy as it sounds. Mudhammam 64 19520 May 18, 2014 at 4:25 pm
Last Post: Mudhammam



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)