Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 4:03 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Separation of Science and State
#21
RE: Separation of Science and State
I am here to testify that many devout Christians think secularism, government neutrality regarding religious matters so far as it is practicable, is a very good thing. It's more common among religious minorities in the USA, who are in a position to see that they would be on the short end of the stick of government partiality towards religion; but I've met many Christians in RL who support separation of state and religion. They've been liberal Catholics and mainstream Protestants; and I've not seen any Christian proponents of church/state separation online; but maybe that's because I hang out on an atheist forum.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Reply
#22
RE: Separation of Science and State
(November 13, 2020 at 9:11 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: He wants to separate the state from something he sees as an existential threat to his religion.

If I viewed it as an existential threat to my religion I would have chosen a different occupation.
Reply
#23
RE: Separation of Science and State
There are downsides as well as upsides to government entanglement in science. For any generalization that you are likely to draw, it will be met with a host of exceptions. So it really needs to be determined on a case by case basis, and as Nudger reminds us, government is essentially a reflection of the will of the people. Where that will is corrupt, government influence on science will be corrupt. It's not clear however, whether science operating on its own independent of government is or is likely to be any less corrupt. Again, it has to be taken on a case by case basis. There are horror stories of government supported science, but there are also horror stories of science funded by the private sector as well, though the two may differ in character. I could do without the Tuskegee study, but I can also do without sky-high insulin prices and drug makers leaving the vaccine market due to its lack of profitability.
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#24
RE: Separation of Science and State
(November 13, 2020 at 12:01 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: I am here to testify that many devout Christians think secularism, government neutrality regarding religious matters so far as it is practicable, is a very good thing. It's more common among religious minorities in the USA, who are in a position to see that they would be on the short end of the stick of government partiality towards religion; but I've met many Christians in RL who support separation of state and religion. They've been liberal Catholics and mainstream Protestants; and I've not seen any Christian proponents of church/state separation online; but maybe that's because I hang out on an atheist forum.

Right; given that my denomination believes Saturday is the Sabbath instead of Sunday, my church has fought many legal battles over religious freedom in favor of separation of Church and State. I'm not a historian, but the concept of separation appears to be religious, born out of the Protestant Reformation and many persecutions. Whenever Church and State have married, the religious have paid for it.

There's a culture of conscientious objectors within my church, so there's definitely a history of standing up to government:

“Genuine Christianity manifests itself in good citizenship and loyalty to civil government. The breaking out of war among men in no way alters the Christian’s supreme allegiance and responsibility to God or modifies their obligation to practice their beliefs and put God first. This partnership with God through Jesus Christ who came into this world not to destroy men’s lives but to save them causes Seventh-day Adventists to advocate a noncombatant position, following their divine Master in not taking human life, but rendering all possible service to save it” (SDA General Conference, 1954).
Reply
#25
RE: Separation of Science and State
(November 13, 2020 at 6:44 am)Belacqua Wrote:
(November 13, 2020 at 1:18 am)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: The question: Should there be any separation between science and government (synonymous to church and state)? What should the relationship between science and government be? Are there any dangers in that relationship?

People on this forum think of science the same way that evangelicals think of God: when it does a good thing, it gets the credit, but when it does a bad thing, something else must be to blame.

In fact science is a loose set of practices, always enacted by fallible biased human beings. These days it is funded mostly by for-profit companies and the Pentagon. Scientists are very likely to discover the things that their funders want them to find. 

Putting our trust in some abstract noun called "science" is a faith-based abdication of responsibility. People in government should act with scientists as advisors, but make their decisions along ethical lines.


The difference is god is an excuse.  Gravity is not.
Reply
#26
RE: Separation of Science and State
(November 13, 2020 at 6:44 am)Belacqua Wrote: People on this forum think of science the same way that evangelicals think of God: when it does a good thing, it gets the credit, but when it does a bad thing, something else must be to blame.

In fact science is a loose set of practices, always enacted by fallible biased human beings. These days it is funded mostly by for-profit companies and the Pentagon. Scientists are very likely to discover the things that their funders want them to find. 

Putting our trust in some abstract noun called "science" is a faith-based abdication of responsibility. People in government should act with scientists as advisors, but make their decisions along ethical lines.

Yes, a corporation or political group can buy some marginal scientist to give any sort of report they want.  Want to say that burning oil helps the environment?  Someone will do that.  Want someone to say that there is no evidence that smoking causes cancer?  You can buy a person for that as well.

But they won't actually be doing science, and their career will last only as long as their funding.  Science is a global endeavor.  Theories and reputations rise or fall on their own merits.  Bad science gets fixed or at least ignored.  Most scientists don't skew their results for political aims, despite what the right-wing would have you believe.
Reply
#27
RE: Separation of Science and State
Policies should always have a scientific basis and religion nothing of value in policymaking and should be totally excluded from it. Any abuses of science are not founded in science because science is only a method.

Quote:People on this forum think of science the same way that evangelicals think of God:
So mind reading and strawmen now. Usually, you only resort to one.


Quote: when it does a good thing, it gets the credit, but when it does a bad thing, something else must be to blame.
Yup because abuses of science are apart from science 


Quote:In fact science is a loose set of practices, always enacted by fallible biased human beings.
Science is a well-defined set of practices that are humanity's best method of understanding the world and has been it's amost productive endeavor.



Quote: These days it is funded mostly by for-profit companies and the Pentagon.
The United States isn't the only nation that does science 



Quote: Scientists are very likely to discover the things that their funders want them to find. 
And conspiracy theories 


Quote:Putting our trust in some abstract noun called "science" is a faith-based abdication of responsibility.
Nope


Quote: People in government should act with scientists as advisors, but make their decisions along ethical lines.
Ethical lines are informed by science ethics do not exist in a fact-free vacuum
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
#28
RE: Separation of Science and State
The State will create the vaccines that Science developed. This isn't two separate planets we're living on.
Reply
#29
RE: Separation of Science and State
Oh, another one of those "You think x, therefore it's y" bullshit from Bel. Good fun times to be had, all 'round.


(November 13, 2020 at 6:44 am)Belacqua Wrote:
(November 13, 2020 at 1:18 am)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: The question: Should there be any separation between science and government (synonymous to church and state)? What should the relationship between science and government be? Are there any dangers in that relationship?

People on this forum think of science the same way that evangelicals think of God:
(bold mine)

Please tell us more what we think about science, and how you've reached that conclusion on what the fuck is going on in our own heads ...

(November 13, 2020 at 6:44 am)Belacqua Wrote: when it does a good thing, it gets the credit, but when it does a bad thing, something else must be to blame.

Tangentially, I'm sympathetic with OLB, when people use that old canard about the dangers of guns, while simultaneously excluding the guys and gals using the fucking armory. You're such a piece of shit, Bel, and the most pathetic thing is, you actually think you're doing god's work or some shit spreading your bullshit here. Fuck you.

Science is a tool for understanding Nature. And a bunch of dipshit dictators use that tool, e.g. like a fucking jackhammer penetrating skulls, has absofuckinglutely nothing to do with the research behind science, ya piece of catshit.

(November 13, 2020 at 6:44 am)Belacqua Wrote: In fact science is a loose set of practices, always enacted by fallible biased human beings. These days it is funded mostly by for-profit companies and the Pentagon. Scientists are very likely to discover the things that their funders want them to find. 

You hear that folks? The Universe's smallest violin playing for mister catshit here, because he doesn't like how all these "fallible biased human beings" have e.g. put men on the motherfucking Moon, all thanks to the tireless work of ... you guessed it, NASA. That organization with all those "fallible biased human beings" just doing random shit, who would've thunk it?


(November 13, 2020 at 6:44 am)Belacqua Wrote: Putting our trust in some abstract noun called "science" is a faith-based abdication of responsibility. People in government should act with scientists as advisors, but make their decisions along ethical lines.

Gee, think this thought, again, about all the research gone into that microwave you very probably own, when you might want to eat some pop tarts, ya gooddamn simpleton.

(November 13, 2020 at 12:16 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:
(November 13, 2020 at 12:01 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: I am here to testify that many devout Christians think secularism, government neutrality regarding religious matters so far as it is practicable, is a very good thing. It's more common among religious minorities in the USA, who are in a position to see that they would be on the short end of the stick of government partiality towards religion; but I've met many Christians in RL who support separation of state and religion. They've been liberal Catholics and mainstream Protestants; and I've not seen any Christian proponents of church/state separation online; but maybe that's because I hang out on an atheist forum.

Right; given that my denomination believes Saturday is the Sabbath instead of Sunday, my church has fought many legal battles over religious freedom in favor of separation of Church and State. I'm not a historian, but the concept of separation appears to be religious, born out of the Protestant Reformation and many persecutions. Whenever Church and State have married, the religious have paid for it.

There's a culture of conscientious objectors within my church, so there's definitely a history of standing up to government:

“Genuine Christianity manifests itself in good citizenship and loyalty to civil government. The breaking out of war among men in no way alters the Christian’s supreme allegiance and responsibility to God or modifies their obligation to practice their beliefs and put God first. This partnership with God through Jesus Christ who came into this world not to destroy men’s lives but to save them causes Seventh-day Adventists to advocate a noncombatant position, following their divine Master in not taking human life, but rendering all possible service to save it”  (SDA General Conference, 1954).
(bold mine)

Ask a historian what he thinks, rest is bullshit. Try again.

(November 13, 2020 at 11:30 am)Ranjr Wrote: Separation of reality and government was narrowly voted down.  Nevertheless, over 72 million voters are fine with government that ignores math, science, and reason because tax cuts fix everything.

I wouldn't trust those 72 million cultists to accurately tell me what the color of the sky is.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself — and you are the easiest person to fool." - Richard P. Feynman
Reply
#30
RE: Separation of Science and State
(November 13, 2020 at 3:24 pm)HappySkeptic Wrote: But they won't actually be doing science

Yes, thank you; that's what I said.

When "science" reaches bad conclusions, it's not the fault of science. It is the fault of something or someone else. Science itself remains innocent.

Quote:Bad science gets fixed or at least ignored.  

This is a faith-based statement.

In some cases bad science is fixed. In other cases it may remain. 

We know that the conclusions of science change. Whether this is because they move toward some greater truth, or whether they change to keep up with other biases or desired outcomes is an open question, which must be addressed case by case.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Ayn Rand blamed for current state of America Foxaèr 61 2878 June 24, 2021 at 6:17 pm
Last Post: no one
  Has Mark Samsel Done A Good Job As A Kansas State Representative? BrianSoddingBoru4 11 1019 May 3, 2021 at 10:56 am
Last Post: GUBU
  Why is Vatican a state? Fake Messiah 13 1202 November 11, 2020 at 9:07 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Satan and Flying Spaghetti Monster Unite for Church-State Separation AFTT47 2 649 September 23, 2019 at 8:29 am
Last Post: GrandizerII
  The communist state of Kerela, India Duty 5 816 December 22, 2018 at 11:33 pm
Last Post: DodosAreDead
  State level elections in BAvaria yield ground breaking results Deesse23 0 239 October 15, 2018 at 3:50 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  So Apparently We Have An AG Who Doesn't Think Hawaii Is A State. Minimalist 39 7936 October 1, 2018 at 2:17 pm
Last Post: Losty
  Tillerson Out as Secretary of State Crossless2.0 12 1420 March 17, 2018 at 9:11 am
Last Post: Succubus
  Opinions On Secretary of State Tillerson AFTT47 16 2490 December 17, 2017 at 10:34 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  Are you wondering why the State Department is so supine in the face of dismemberment? GUBU 2 846 March 22, 2017 at 9:14 am
Last Post: Alex K



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)