European Court of Justice rules on Insurance / Pensions

[Tiberius]

[theVOID]

It's a great thing, people who have the same medical status or driving efficacy record as someone of the other gender should get the same premiums. People's premiums on these issues should be entirely determined by their own health status and driving record.

[Skipper]

I wish it was mens premiums coming down to womens levels instead of theirs coming up as I feel insurance companies are complete fucking rip-off merchants and will do anything to not pay out when you do need them. I don't drive by the way However, I guess in the interests of equality it can't be argued that just purely being male means you should pay more money for a service.

[theVOID]

They should reasonably meet half way, they likely will.

Insurance companies are a good thing, for people who lack the fiscal responsibility to pay for their own minor/moderate properties and obligations - You could quite reasonably only have to insure your house.

[Minimalist]

Anything that smacks those insurance company cocksuckers in the teeth is a good thing.

[Skipper]

They should reasonably meet half way, they likely will.

Insurance companies are a good thing, for people who lack the fiscal responsibility to pay for their own minor/moderate properties and obligations - You could quite reasonably only have to insure your house.

Yea, I think womens are going up something like 60% whilst mens are going down 20%. It should be the other way around though, but obviously it wont be the insurance companies that are out of pocket.

Also, In the U.K it's a legal obligation to have insurance on your car. At least to cover you for damaging others. But I agree, I'd say as little reliance on insurance companies is a great thing. I have none. For anything.

[leo-rcc]

If in general women build up a higher no-claim, then that is fine, as long as men with a spotless accident record can reach that same no-claim premium I don't mind that at all. The height of your insurance should be based on your track record and driving skills, not on gender. The base premiums should be the same for everyone.

Pensions, if you spent as many years working for one as the other person you should receive the same pension, also regardless of gender.

---

Also, In the U.K it's a legal obligation to have insurance on your car. At least to cover you for damaging others.

Same here in the Netherlands.

[theVOID]

I have a huge problem with that kind of fascism, Government should not be able to force you to buy something from any company.

Nice, I have contents insurance up to $5000 dollars for $85 a year and will keep it until I have enough savings to account for any potential losses on necessary items, once I've done that i'll cut it off. I'm taxed to buy health insurance so if that ever changes it will be a similar situation.

---

Anything that smacks those insurance company cocksuckers in the teeth is a good thing.

So you don't buy insurance? If you do it's clearly because it's better than the alternative risk.

[leo-rcc]

I have a huge problem with that kind of fascism, Government should not be able to force you to buy something from any company.

I can see the reasoning behind it though.

[theVOID]

I have a huge problem with that kind of fascism, Government should not be able to force you to buy something from any company.

I can see the reasoning behind it though.

Failure to pay whilst uninsured resulting in seized assets or labour to the state so they can pay the victim in the interim would be a better option, it's how it works here. You don't need to engage in fascism to have a fair and effective system.