RE: U.S. reviews 9/11 documents for possible release
August 14, 2021 at 8:45 pm
(This post was last modified: August 14, 2021 at 9:52 pm by WinterHold.)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 1, 2026, 3:12 am
Thread Rating:
|
U.S. reviews 9/11 documents for possible release
|
(August 14, 2021 at 8:45 pm)WinterHold Wrote: the American government uses the loose, ambiguous term "terrorism" to stain its foes or anybody it doesn't like Mmm, no, every nation in the world calls the bombing of Hiroshima a war action, only you call it terrorism. Nor did the American government call Japanese or Nazi soldiers terrorists although it didn't like them.
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
Quote:I think the U.S is confusing who is the real "terrorists" and who are the "freedom fighters" who stood like mountains against the USSR followed by the invasion of western countries. The Taliban -for example- were the terrorists of yesterday in the eyes of the U.S who became "not really terrorists" and were even allowed to open diplomatic offices in countries like Qatar !The Taliban are a bunch of cowardly thugs who throw acid in the faces of defenseless girls for wanting to learn to read Quote:Then just like I can't call "nuclear attacks" terrorism; you must also admit -considering the 2003 Iraq invasion which turned out to be a scandal for WMDs that dont exist and the ranking of the Taliban as terrorists to come back after decades and admit they arent and deserve to open diplomatic offices- to be a "loose ; ambiguous charge by the U.S"; and better: "the American government uses the loose, ambiguous term "terrorism" to stain its foes or anybody it doesn't like", which is quite disgusting, outrageous and a low act if you ask me; satanic to the core. Hundreds of thousands died in the worst ways because of the U.S actions.The Bombing of Japan was war not Terrorism same as the Bitz was war not terrorism
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse! ![]() “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?” –SHIRLEY CHISHOLM RE: U.S. reviews 9/11 documents for possible release
August 15, 2021 at 5:30 am
(This post was last modified: August 15, 2021 at 5:32 am by WinterHold.)
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
(August 15, 2021 at 5:30 am)WinterHold Wrote: Actually Nuclear Weapons are "illegal weapons" since 2017 by the UN: Hiroshima/Nagasaki: 1945 Banning of nuclear weapons: 2017
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
(August 15, 2021 at 5:54 am)WinterHold Wrote:(August 15, 2021 at 5:37 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: The fine folks at Greenpeace are overstating the importance of the TPNW. How much good is a treaty banning nukes when NO nuclear-armed state is signatory to it? Whut? Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Quote:Nuclear weapons are internationally banned weapons; used only by the backward and savage armies that has its mind stuck in the dark ages still.Lol yeah because the dark ages were well known for having nuclear states And from a person from a culture forever stuck in the 14th century calling us backward is fucking hilarious
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse! ![]() “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?” –SHIRLEY CHISHOLM |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)




![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)