|
Atheism and the existence of peanut butter
|
 (September 7, 2021 at 7:57 pm)Jehanne Wrote: Show me evidence of the ISM, the Invisible Sock Monster. It's possible that the ISM exists. Even in experimental sciences, we sometimes posit stuff that turns out to be imaginary (say, the luminiferous aether to explain the propagation of light). (September 7, 2021 at 7:59 pm)Helios Wrote: Nah it's not a category error. It's simply inconvenient Read more about what a category mistake means before you start embarassing yourself. 
 RE: Atheism and the existence of peanut butter
September 7, 2021 at 8:05 pm
(This post was last modified: September 7, 2021 at 8:18 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:Read more about what a category mistake means before you start embarassing yourself.Nah I know what a category mistake is just fine, And that ain't it friend. So kindly shove your baseless condensation up your backside. The only embarrassment on this forum is you and your deluded attempts to defend make-believe  Pathetic  (September 7, 2021 at 7:57 pm)Jehanne Wrote:Well, his response is because the invisible sock monster is possible. That's good enough(September 7, 2021 at 7:56 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Category mistake: asking for concrete/empirical evidence for the existence of a non-empirical being. Too bad all the things he compares it to are nothing like the ISM
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse! ![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843) “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?” –SHIRLEY CHISHOLM  (September 7, 2021 at 7:56 pm)Klorophyll Wrote:(September 7, 2021 at 7:46 pm)brewer Wrote: Show me concrete evidence for god Then maybe you should stop using the existence of the universe as evidence for God. Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
(September 7, 2021 at 8:20 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:Or better still stop his lunatic crusade to convince us of nonesense(September 7, 2021 at 7:56 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Category mistake: asking for concrete/empirical evidence for the existence of a non-empirical being.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse! “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?” –SHIRLEY CHISHOLM Quote:The universe's existence is used as a premise in a posteriori arguments for God, not as direct evidence. Premise and evidence aren't the same thing.In other words baseless bullshit
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse! “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?” –SHIRLEY CHISHOLM (September 7, 2021 at 8:24 pm)Klorophyll Wrote:(September 7, 2021 at 8:20 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Then maybe you should stop using the existence of the universe as evidence for God. Be very, very careful. Backpedaling that fast could get your trousers caught in the bike chain. Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
 (September 7, 2021 at 7:56 pm)Klorophyll Wrote:(September 7, 2021 at 7:46 pm)brewer Wrote: Show me concrete evidence for god I consider your belief logically invalid. Don't you mean a non-existent being, accept as a mental construct, the same as with other imaginary beings?
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
RE: Atheism and the existence of peanut butter
September 7, 2021 at 8:39 pm
(This post was last modified: September 7, 2021 at 8:41 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
(September 7, 2021 at 8:32 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:Now watch him invent word salad to cover his ass(September 7, 2021 at 8:24 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: The universe's existence is used as a premise in a posteriori arguments for God, not as direct evidence. Premise and evidence aren't the same thing. (September 7, 2021 at 8:39 pm)brewer Wrote:Pretty much as the diffrence is negligible(September 7, 2021 at 7:56 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Category mistake: asking for concrete/empirical evidence for the existence of a non-empirical being.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse! “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?” –SHIRLEY CHISHOLM |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
