Kyle Rittenhouse Trial

[no one]

And I would have the right to be in his house.
Are you attempting to deny my basic rights?

[Irreligious Atheist]

So you're reprimanding me for not being able to read your mind about what you thought about the Rittenhouse situation? I was the only person who stood up for Kyle at first. Props to Online Biker for doing the same a short time later as well. I don't know what your opinion was, and obviously I can't know if you don't post it. All I remember was I was the only person saying Kyle did nothing wrong legally, and I was called a Nazi for it. The facts be damned. Like I just said, it's about team sports. Kyle was seen as anti-BLM, so none of the facts actually mattered. Period. That's how this forum operates. It wasn't like this ten years ago. It wasn't like this during the George Zimmerman trial. At least half of the atheist posters supported Zimmerman being let off back then on the atheist forum I was on. Nowadays, I'd probably be the only one defending Zimmerman. Times have changed, my friend. It's all about team sports now. Step out of line even a bit, and you're declared a nazi. That's why people won't speak up anymore like I do. They're scared. Self censorship was your goal, and you won.

No, I'm reprimanding you for claiming something that was false as well as being stupid enough to conclude that you were the only one based on you being the only one who opined in favor of Rittenhouse.  That's shitty thinking.  And that we're here, still debating whether or not it's shitty thinking, simply goes further to solidify your reputation as an illogical nutball with shit for brains.  If you had claimed that you were the only person who opined in favor of Rittenhouse's acquittal, that would have been a different statement, and I still would have had legitimate complaints.  Concluding anything based upon who chose to participate in a thread does nothing to support your belief that you were some special flower because you have no way of knowing if those who expressed their opinions were a good representation of all of us here or not.  The squeaky wheel gets the grease.  If you only count squeaky wheels, you're gonna end up underestimating the number of wheels.   So that's another thinking error.  Honestly, fallacies and cognitive biases run in and out of your thinking like trains at Grand Central Station.  As to whether things have changed, I know that I have gotten more willing to give voice to unpopular opinions over the years, so your paranoid scenario doesn't ring true with me.  Generalizations are built on evidence.  Given that you appear to be a nutter with shitty thinking skills, I'm not willing to accept a generalization which appears based on nothing more than stories and talking points about the intimidation of the woke mob.  Lacking any actual evidence, I suspect this is just you projecting your fantasies onto reality yet again.

lol wut? Seriously?

Ok. I will rephrase what I posted before. I was the only one to put in writing my support of Rittenhouse and him acting in self defense, and I was correct, and I was called a nazi for it. Better?

[Silver]

When you're going to derail from the real issue of Kyle's crimes by erroneously claiming we want to make it illegal to walk down the street, as you ignorantly slant it, then you are indeed promoting fake news.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Nope. You wish Kyle was murdered by that rapist because Kyle has political beliefs you disagree with, so you are the supporter of murder, and it's gross. End of story.

Nope, I would prefer his dumbass was never there in the first place. So the only murderer supporter here is you because support a murderer .End of story 

So shove your strawmen up your ass 

---

lol wut? Seriously?

Ok. I will rephrase what I posted before. I was the only one to put in writing my support of Rittenhouse and him acting in self defense, and I was correct, and I was called a nazi for it. Better?

Bullshit 

[Angrboda]

No, I'm reprimanding you for claiming something that was false as well as being stupid enough to conclude that you were the only one based on you being the only one who opined in favor of Rittenhouse.  That's shitty thinking.  And that we're here, still debating whether or not it's shitty thinking, simply goes further to solidify your reputation as an illogical nutball with shit for brains.  If you had claimed that you were the only person who opined in favor of Rittenhouse's acquittal, that would have been a different statement, and I still would have had legitimate complaints.  Concluding anything based upon who chose to participate in a thread does nothing to support your belief that you were some special flower because you have no way of knowing if those who expressed their opinions were a good representation of all of us here or not.  The squeaky wheel gets the grease.  If you only count squeaky wheels, you're gonna end up underestimating the number of wheels.   So that's another thinking error.  Honestly, fallacies and cognitive biases run in and out of your thinking like trains at Grand Central Station.  As to whether things have changed, I know that I have gotten more willing to give voice to unpopular opinions over the years, so your paranoid scenario doesn't ring true with me.  Generalizations are built on evidence.  Given that you appear to be a nutter with shitty thinking skills, I'm not willing to accept a generalization which appears based on nothing more than stories and talking points about the intimidation of the woke mob.  Lacking any actual evidence, I suspect this is just you projecting your fantasies onto reality yet again.

lol wut? Seriously?

Ok. I will rephrase what I posted before. I was the only one to put in writing my support of Rittenhouse and him acting in self defense, and I was correct, and I was called a nazi for it. Better?

No, for the reasons already explained in the post to which you are replying. Seriously, can you not read? And it's also false as I recently posted that I was willing to give Rittenhouse the benefit of the doubt. So you were wrong both in what you were implying -- that you were alone in thinking Rittenhouse deserved acquittal -- and in the literal truth of what you wish you had said -- because I had in fact spoken up. Even after moving the goalposts you still missed. And you wonder why you have no credibility.

[The Architect Of Fate]

When you're going to derail from the real issue of Kyle's crimes by erroneously claiming we want to make it illegal to walk down the street, as you ignorantly slant it, then you are indeed promoting fake news.

Anything to defend the favored murderer 

[Irreligious Atheist]

lol wut? Seriously?

Ok. I will rephrase what I posted before. I was the only one to put in writing my support of Rittenhouse and him acting in self defense, and I was correct, and I was called a nazi for it. Better?

No, for the reasons already explained in the post to which you are replying.  Seriously, can you not read?  And it's also false as I recently posted that I was willing to give Rittenhouse the benefit of the doubt.  So you were wrong both in what you were implying -- that you were alone in thinking Rittenhouse deserved acquittal -- and in the literal truth of what you wish you had said -- because I had in fact spoken up.  Somehow you miscounted who had and hadn't spoken up.  Who is your accountant, Alan Weisselberg?  And you wonder why you have no credibility.

You recently posted? I was talking about the original thread made, right after the shooting. Everyone was in "Kyle needs to be lynched" mode, while I saw the obvious, and Online Biker did not too long after me, when further video was released. He and I were the only ones, as far as I can remember. You may have waited for more information to come in and for more months to go by before you commented on the case, which is fine, but my point is that when the shooting happened, I was the only one that was correct on the forum, as far as what was written by forum members at the time, and I was called racist for it, which is hilarious, as I was entirely right about my interpretation of the law and how Kyle acted. Team sports. You either support the political side you're supposed to support, the facts be damned, or you're a nazi. That's atheist forums 101.

---

Nope. You wish Kyle was murdered by that rapist because Kyle has political beliefs you disagree with, so you are the supporter of murder, and it's gross. End of story.

Nope, I would prefer his dumbass was never there in the first place. So the only murderer supporter here is you because support a murderer .End of story 

So shove your strawmen up your ass 

---

lol wut? Seriously?

Ok. I will rephrase what I posted before. I was the only one to put in writing my support of Rittenhouse and him acting in self defense, and I was correct, and I was called a nazi for it. Better?

Bullshit 

You don't get to tell people what streets they can walk down. You're not the law, and you were massively wrong about this case. Deal with it.

---

When you're going to derail from the real issue of Kyle's crimes by erroneously claiming we want to make it illegal to walk down the street, as you ignorantly slant it, then you are indeed promoting fake news.

Never claimed that. I simply asked a question.

[The Architect Of Fate]

You don't get to tell people what streets they can walk down. You're not the law, and you were massively wrong about this case. Deal with it.

 Deploying the same bullshit rhetorical tactic over again doesn't help you. I am right Kyle is guilty and evaded justice. Deal with it 

---

Never claimed that. I simply asked a question

Bullshit

---

You recently posted? I was talking about the original thread made, right after the shooting. Everyone was in "Kyle needs to be lynched" mode, while I saw the obvious, and Online Biker did not too long after me, when further video was released. He and I were the only ones, as far as I can remember. You may have waited for more information to come in and for more months to go by before you commented on the case, which is fine, but my point is that when the shooting happened, I was the only one that was correct on the forum, as far as what was written by forum members at the time, and I was called racist for it, which is hilarious, as I was entirely right about my interpretation of the law and how Kyle acted. Team sports. You either support the political side you're supposed to support, the facts be damned, or you're a nazi. That's atheist forums 101.

Delusional bullshit and meaningless spin mixed with mindless buzzwords

[Angrboda]

I was the only one that was correct on the forum, as far as what was written by forum members at the time

Which gets you nothing for the reasons already explained and then pointed out to you. Seriously, do you have a learning disability?

I didn't wait for more information before opining. My decision to opine when I did had to do with Biker having said something stupidly wrong. Your attempting to build a narrative out of my silence only further solidifies your reputation for building your conclusions based upon speculation, conjecture, shitty thinking, and your own paranoid fantasies.

Honestly, if I didn't know from previous encounters that your claims generally don't hold up to inspection, I might believe you were trolling, acting intentionally stupid to provoke a response.

[The Architect Of Fate]

I was the only one that was correct on the forum, as far as what was written by forum members at the time

Which gets you nothing for the reasons already explained and then pointed out to you.  Seriously, do you have a learning disability?

I didn't wait for more information before opining.  My decision to opine when I did had more to do with Biker having said something stupidly wrong.  Your attempting to build a narrative out of my silence only further solidifies your reputation for building your conclusions based upon speculation, conjecture, shitty thinking, and your own paranoid fantasies.

Honestly, if I didn't know from previous encounters that your claims don't hold up to inspection, I might believe you were trolling, acting intentionally stupid to provoke a response.

IA has nothing imagined self agendizing narratives