|
Who was the worst Christian in history?
|
 (May 1, 2022 at 3:32 am)Nomad Wrote:(April 30, 2022 at 3:46 pm)Jehanne Wrote: Admittedly, Jesus was a common name. Saul did not change his name; Paul is the Latinized form of it. The scholarly consensus is that Paul wrote 7 letters with the others being of unknown authorship.  (April 30, 2022 at 8:18 am)Jehanne Wrote:(April 30, 2022 at 7:51 am)Foxaire Wrote: The very first one who started this whole mess. It is not amiss to measure someone who is not Christian himself with the putative standards of Christianity and conclude Christian are ignorant hypocrites to venerate him.  
If you think like a Republican, the title of this thread could be "The BEST Christian in History" and many of the answers would be the same.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" 
Pat Mustard
God! Theresa, I forgot me fecking trousers!  Religious Views: the Disc's first ligthning proof atheist (May 1, 2022 at 8:37 am)Jehanne Wrote:(May 1, 2022 at 3:32 am)Nomad Wrote: What I meant was which one of the four authors of the "Pauline" epistles are you saying is the worst? The scholarly consensus is mostly a bunch of christian apologists. In this case I don't have much meas for it.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home 
Pope Sixtus IV, founder of The Spanish Inquisition. (Okay, cue the Monty Python sketch.)
Pope Sixtus IV - Wikipedia
"The world is my country; all of humanity are my brethren; and to do good deeds is my religion." (Thomas Paine)
RE: Who was the worst Christian in history?
May 6, 2022 at 7:08 am
(This post was last modified: May 6, 2022 at 7:09 am by The Grand Nudger.)
(May 6, 2022 at 2:37 am)Nomad Wrote:(May 1, 2022 at 8:37 am)Jehanne Wrote: The scholarly consensus is that Paul wrote 7 letters with the others being of unknown authorship. More complicated. The scholarly consensus is actually a negotiation between a widely referenced reductive school that only left four, and christian apologists. Those four, written by someone..but paul in contemporary scholarship is a literary convention, explicitly so..not a man. The character of paul as described even in just the four, or seven, is believed to be pious fiction (or fraud, if you prefer).
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
(May 6, 2022 at 2:37 am)Nomad Wrote:(May 1, 2022 at 8:37 am)Jehanne Wrote: The scholarly consensus is that Paul wrote 7 letters with the others being of unknown authorship. Granted, there is a selection effect here, just as in Islamic scholarship. Still, among the minority of nonbelieving New Testament scholars, the number 7 seems to be a near-universal consensus.
Are you asking, who is the very naughtiest boy? :-)
 Administrator Notice
Thread closed per necroposting guidelines. ![[Image: MmQV79M.png]](https://i.imgur.com/MmQV79M.png) |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
