Why is prostatin not the cure to HIV

[highdimensionman]

It is the only chemical known that flushes HIV out of the cells and clears it out of your body to a level that is undetectable for as long as the research. If the pharmaceutical industry had a palatable not from nature alternative which was as good they would be calling it a cure. I await correcting on this issue.
Paul Cox discovered this substance in the late 80's early nighties why so little coverage. Yes I am implying something fishy about big pharma and how it operates because this chemical is not the only one to lack coverage and get poo pooed as being not as good as special special patentable not naturally occurring chemicals. That's prostratin sorry I spelt it wrong.

[Rev. Rye]

I'm not too familiar with prostratin, but I was intrigued enough to do a bit of research on it. One crucial thing to note is that the natural form of prostatin is in the bark of a few different types of trees, all of which are very rare, especially if you don't live in places like Samoa, where the Mamala tree (the most famous natural source of prostatin) is from. This has hindered research into how well it truly works, and even after it was initially synthesised, it doesn't seem like there's enough of the drug to completely test (for instance, how long does this flushing out of HIV last), let alone produce in big enough quantities to be commercially viable. And even if it's all down to greed, it's worth noting that there's almost certainly a way to patent it, even if it's just by adding a coating to make its half-life longer.

[brewer]

Prostratin (you got the name wrong) by itself can't be a cure. Do some more reading then come back.

It's late here and I have no time to teach you now.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5892446/