Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 29, 2024, 11:55 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning.
#31
RE: Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning.
Quote:About 15 years ago, Dr. Meyer wrote Signature in the Cell, arguing that DNA was evidence of Design. While Atheists of course criticized the book (no surprises there!),
It wasn't atheists it was the scientific community that rejected Meyers's book. In fact, it condemned him for writing pop science instead of publishing his ideas in peer review (citing conspiracy as the reason) because he knows he's lying and he has to drum up support from people who know nothing about the subject.
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
#32
RE: Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning.
(June 17, 2023 at 2:45 pm)Helios Wrote:
Quote:About 15 years ago, Dr. Meyer wrote Signature in the Cell, arguing that DNA was evidence of Design. While Atheists of course criticized the book (no surprises there!),
It wasn't atheists it was the scientific community that rejected Meyers's book. In fact, it condemned him for writing pop science instead of publishing his ideas in peer review (citing conspiracy as the reason) because he knows he's lying and he has to drum up support from people who know nothing about the subject.

The chief problem with Stephen Meyer is that he’s one of those ‘people who know nothing about the subject. Being credentialed in the history of science doesn’t make one a scientist.

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#33
RE: Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning.
(June 17, 2023 at 1:29 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:
(June 17, 2023 at 12:31 pm)brewer Wrote: Somebody needs to get their money back from the catholics.

You don't get to argue any god(s) into existence, except maybe to suckers.

Most people DON'T WANT TO KNOW it's all bullshit. They're willing to lie to themselves and everybody else about what is "truth". Then they can forget about it.

If it makes them (the religious) content then it's fine with me. Just don't come to an atheist forum, or me and expect the bullshit to be some how validated.

I think their time would be better spent fleecing the sheep, there are plenty out there and they are always birthing more to enter the indoctrination club.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
#34
RE: Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning.
(June 17, 2023 at 3:20 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(June 17, 2023 at 2:45 pm)Helios Wrote: It wasn't atheists it was the scientific community that rejected Meyers's book. In fact, it condemned him for writing pop science instead of publishing his ideas in peer review (citing conspiracy as the reason) because he knows he's lying and he has to drum up support from people who know nothing about the subject.

The chief problem with Stephen Meyer is that he’s one of those ‘people who know nothing about the subject. Being credentialed in the history of science doesn’t make one a scientist.

Boru
That and he's dishonest
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
#35
RE: Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning.
Nope.
Dying to live, living to die.
Reply
#36
RE: Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning.
(June 17, 2023 at 4:44 am)Nishant Xavier Wrote:
(June 17, 2023 at 4:06 am)Tomato Wrote: Poppycock.

Lol. Great Argument, Bro. Logically reasoned through from beginning to end. </sarcasm>

Honestly, he gave your "argument" (for lack of a better term) exactly the response it deserves.

The design fallacy has been presented here, and debunked here, so many fucking times that many of us simply don't care to argue it any longer. If you wish to pursue it to it's inevitable conclusion, by all means have at it. There are some here who are willing to trash your pathetic psuedo-science for you. But, don't be surprised by the outright dismissal from many who have done it to death already.

We've grown tired of: Dead Horse
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
#37
RE: Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning.
Quote:Lol. Great Argument, Bro. Logically reasoned through from beginning to end. </sarcasm>
He only gave the question the answer it warranted. Sorry you feel your ideas warrant more  Hehe
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
#38
RE: Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning.
Just so you know he makes the same type of threads on the other forum he's on.

Very long, very droning and often very incoherent.

You won't be having any meaningful dialog with him, ever.


Sadly he's the type that will fester here for a long time I fear.
"For the only way to eternal glory is a life lived in service of our Lord, FSM; Verily it is FSM who is the perfect being the name higher than all names, king of all kings and will bestow upon us all, one day, The great reclaiming"  -The Prophet Boiardi-

      Conservative trigger warning.
[Image: s-l640.jpg]
                                                                                         
Reply
#39
RE: Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning.
(June 17, 2023 at 3:21 pm)brewer Wrote: If it makes them (the religious) content then it's fine with me. Just don't come to an atheist forum, or me and expect the bullshit to be some how validated.

It shouldn't be. They spread their bullshit.
Reply
#40
RE: Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning.
(June 17, 2023 at 12:09 pm)Astreja Wrote:
(June 17, 2023 at 3:53 am)Nishant Xavier Wrote: Thoughts? How much more does the Creator/Designer of the Universe have to do for us in order for us to acknowledge His Existence?

 Actually. Fucking. Show. Up. In. The. Physical. World. In. 2023.

That is my evidentiary standard, Nishant.  There are no philosophical arguments that I find sufficiently convincing.  Not a single one.  I need firsthand physical evidence of a god-like being, and until I receive that evidence I am proceeding on the assumption that all gods and god-like beings are fictional.

Could existence of non-physcial things like consciousness be considered evidence?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Are god and religion ways of saying "screw you" to nature? ShinyCrystals 18 909 January 8, 2024 at 12:27 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Who or what is "Nature's god" BananaFlambe 26 1830 December 4, 2023 at 5:15 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 6777 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Foxaèr
  The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Nishant Xavier 38 2487 August 7, 2023 at 10:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  When were the Gospels Written? The External and Internal Evidence. Nishant Xavier 62 3376 August 6, 2023 at 10:25 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Veridical NDEs: Evidence/Proof of the Soul and the After-Life? Nishant Xavier 32 1660 August 6, 2023 at 5:36 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Isaiah 53, 700 B.C: Historical Evidence of the Divine Omniscience. Nishant Xavier 91 4792 August 6, 2023 at 2:19 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. Nishant Xavier 162 8147 July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Why the resurrection accounts are not evidence LinuxGal 5 1050 October 29, 2022 at 2:01 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Legal evidence of atheism Interaktive 16 2607 February 9, 2020 at 8:44 pm
Last Post: Fireball



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)