Abiogenesis ("Chemical Evolution"): Did Life come from Non-Life by Pure Chance.

[Nishant Xavier]

[The Architect Of Fate]

Abiogenesis is nothing like Spontaneous Generation and none of the evidence against the former applies to the latter and once again appealing to a creationist source and ID is pseudoscience and in no way rational. Also, Abiogenisis is not pure chance that doesn't even make sense as a statement 

[Peebothuhlu]

Quotes a load of propganda from: https://creation.com/abiogenesis

No.

[Rev. Rye]

In the spirit of not having an original thought in your head, I'll just let Pink Guy from Filthy Frank give my response to this thread, and all the many other threads this idiot keeps spamming:

[Nishant Xavier]

You quote your Atheist websites, we'll quote our Christian websites, that's how this works. I've provided plenty of commentary of my own either summarizing the arguments made in the links or books I refer to, or developing them, or replying to objections made against them etc.

The fact remains Spontaneous Abiogenesis is so exceedingly unlikely that it's more rational to infer the Formation of Intelligent Life came about through Intelligent Design rather than some chance combination of elements allegedly creating the first cell. Will provide more detail on this shortly.

[The Architect Of Fate]

You quote your Atheist websites, we'll quote our Christian websites, that's how this works. I've provided plenty of commentary of my own either summarizing the arguments made in the links or books I refer to, or developing them, or replying to objections made against them etc.

You quote creationist garbage we quote actual science so no that's not how this works. All you have done is display your personal ignorance and no all you have done is mindlessly repeat creationist talking points.

The fact remains Spontaneous Abiogenesis is so exceedingly unlikely that it's more rational to infer the Formation of Intelligent Life came about through Intelligent Design rather than some chance combination of elements allegedly creating the first cell. Will provide more detail on this shortly.

Nope, Abiogenesis is actual science and is completely likely, and intelligent design is bunk pseudoscience. And Abiogenesis didn't happen by chance that's and you will provide nothing that shows anything but your ignorance and embrace of pseudoscience.

[Peebothuhlu]

You quote your Atheist websites, we'll quote our Christian websites, that's how this works. I've provided plenty of commentary of my own either summarizing the arguments made in the links or books I refer to, or developing them, or replying to objections made against them etc.

The fact remains Spontaneous Abiogenesis is so exceedingly unlikely that it's more rational to infer the Formation of Intelligent Life came about through Intelligent Design rather than some chance combination of elements allegedly creating the first cell. Will provide more detail on this shortly.

Hello Nishant.

What would be your reply to the comment that pretty much all Creationist-Christian sites have a long history of lying. Quote mining. Misrepresentation. Along with a general complete lack of any properly accredited scientific credentials?

[Nishant Xavier]

[Peebothuhlu]

[Nishant Xavier]

First of all, it shows this claim of yours: "Along with a general complete lack of any properly accredited scientific credentials?" was not correct.

This is the Slanderous Discrimination against Christians and even highly qualified Creation Scientists that goes in the profession with hardly anyone protesting.

Second, provide well-documented instances of this alleged quote-mining that you're talking about and we'll examine them right here.