Why not get SWAT anti terrorism team, to kill Muslims if they try to kill people for

[Hjelmar90]

Yikes.  I guess we've got another name for the list of people we can't turn our backs on for a second.  

"Unpredictable at least" is not what you want out of your global hegemon, lol.

Then are you gonna argue for burn the quran day or draw muhammad day. While you are likely gonna get murdered for it?
How can you claim to be pro free speech if you cant even defend it correctly? Why even argue for it if its so fragile to begin with?

[The Grand Nudger]

That's everyday here my guy. You can draw dicks on big mo's face in the margins of a quran and then burn it to start your smoker, if you want. If islamists want to do something about that we get testy. Our idea of a proportionate response is very american. OFC, the us doesn't have now and has never really had any islamic terrorist issue. It's the domestics that top our charts. I'm sure you've heard the story of what america did to the last crop of nazis?

[Hjelmar90]

That's everyday here my guy.  You can draw dicks on big mo's face in the margins of a quran and then burn it to start your smoker, if you want.  If islamists want to do something about that we get testy.  Our idea of a proportionate response is very american.  OFC, the us doesn't have now and has never really had any islamic terrorist issue.  It's the domestics that top our charts.  I'm sure you've heard the story of what america did to the last crop of nazis?

The thing is some brag about the violence. Not joking.

What we see as barbaric they argue that "Well no other religions will kill another person for it, therefor we rule".

I think Andrew Tate sorta made some comparison too of it aswell. And "Salwan Momika" an Iraqi who burned Qurans to express his views, got killed aswell recently in Sweden.

Either case i think the best response is "Find evidence of anyone who intentionally argues for killing people for burning Qurans, disrespecting Islam or making image pictures of Muhammad, their sentence should be this, execute those people with no trial"

[The Grand Nudger]

People say all sorts of shit. I don't care what andrew tate says about anything. Extrajudicial executions are unamerican. Any movement that acts on that is a criminal movement, and american cops have been known to go a little rough on criminals. If they absolutely insist on showing their asses, and become an active domestic terror movement, they'll have to deal with the service..which isn't exactly softer than the cops.

[arewethereyet]

Seems odd to me to come right out the gate on a new forum with questions regarding killing people.

note to self - watch this one

[The Grand Nudger]

It's always so weird. It's not really my business to tell people how to run whatever shithole they're in where islamists are allowed to kill and terrorize people without consequence. If they want to get fashy whatever, but the us fought a global war to keep european fascism off american shores, and we're over quota on neo-nazis as it is.

[Hjelmar90]

Seems odd to me to come right out the gate on a new forum with questions regarding killing people.

note to self - watch this one

People in authority should do it if Islamist murderers are guilty yes. Having an opinion is not the same.

But be sure to watch me. But your freedom of speech is insanely weak if you are just gonna let

Administrator Notice
racial sur removed, read the rules.

 walk over you this way.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Seems odd to me to come right out the gate on a new forum with questions regarding killing people.

note to self - watch this one

People in authority should do it if Islamist murderers are guilty yes. Having an opinion is not the same.

But be sure to watch me. But your freedom of speech is insanely weak if you are just gonna let

Administrator Notice
slur removed

walk over you this way.

How can you determine if someone is guilty (of anything) without a trial?

You’re advocating killing people. Should you be executed without a trial? I dislike to say this because you’re new here, but you come off as kinda stupid.

Boru

[Sheldon]

That's everyday here my guy.  You can draw dicks on big mo's face in the margins of a quran and then burn it to start your smoker, if you want.  If islamists want to do something about that we get testy.  Our idea of a proportionate response is very american.  OFC, the us doesn't have now and has never really had any islamic terrorist issue.  It's the domestics that top our charts.  I'm sure you've heard the story of what america did to the last crop of nazis?

The thing is some brag about the violence. 

You have been revelling in the notion of violence from your first post. 

What we see as barbaric 

What I see as barbaric is your bigoted rhetoric. The only difference between you and Islamic extremists, is who you're directing your hate filled bigotry at. It's not them and us, it's you and them together, with the same hate filled mindset. 

I think Andrew Tate 

He's a hate filled bigot, and a misogynistic scumbag, so I view what he thinks, with that fact in mind. 

 "Salwan Momika" an Iraqi who burned Qurans to express his views, got killed aswell recently in Sweden.

...i think the best response is "....execute those people with no trial"

Exactly the way they think, the irony is palpable.

[The Grand Nudger]

Seems odd to me to come right out the gate on a new forum with questions regarding killing people.

note to self - watch this one

People in authority should do it if Islamist murderers are guilty yes. Having an opinion is not the same.

But be sure to watch me. But your freedom of speech is insanely weak if you are just gonna let [admin]slur removed]/admin]Turban heads walk over you this way.

That's not who's trying to walk all over us Hjelmar.  The people doing that in the us aren't islamists.  They're you.  I suspect that we'll end up getting exactly as rough as you say we should whether it's legal or not.