To the question of does God exist, the answer is whether Intelligence created Life

[Paleophyte]

Is DNA intelligent

No.

DNA is not intelligent. It may contain information. But much like a CD, a thumb drive, a microwave transmission, or a clock, DNA is not intelligent. It doesn't perceive, understand, or act on information.

[The Valkyrie]

To all members who have participated in the discussion so far and to those who are just watching, I will ask a question that is completely related to the thread.
Is DNA intelligent in your opinion? Yes, no, I don't know are correct answers with logical justification.
Answers with evasiveness unrelated to the question will not be answered.

No.

[Astreja]

Is DNA intelligent in your opinion? Yes, no, I don't know are correct answers with logical justification.

No, DNA is not intelligent. There's no basis for it being intelligent. It's a complex molecule made up of four nucleotide bases that can be rearranged, so its structure is subject to modification by outside forces such as its chemical environment. It also has no traits that would cause it to be intelligent. It has no mechanism for inputting sensory data about its environment and does not exhibit any intention or volition.  All it can do is make chemical bonds.

[panpan]

Man is not simply a “possessor” of DNA, but a manifestation of the intelligence of DNA. Every cell, thought, action and creation of man is an extension of the same functional mechanism: Perception → Organization → Action. Therefore, man is DNA in evolution, and his intelligence is an integral part of the intelligence of Nature. The creation of Artificial Intelligence by man is, ultimately, an act of DNA through man, confirming the Second Absolute Law. Man is therefore the intelligent DNA.

[Paraselene]

[Fake Messiah]

And panpan is a manifestation of the Mad Libs game that uses random words and pastes them into nonsensical sentences.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Man is not simply a “possessor” of DNA, but a manifestation of the intelligence of DNA. Every cell, thought, action and creation of man is an extension of the same functional mechanism: Perception → Organization → Action. Therefore, man is DNA in evolution, and his intelligence is an integral part of the intelligence of Nature. The creation of Artificial Intelligence by man is, ultimately, an act of DNA through man, confirming the Second Absolute Law. Man is therefore the intelligent DNA.

Why would you bother asking us if DNA is intelligent when you’ve already decided - in the face of NO supportive evidence - that it is?

Do you have your own unique definition of ‘intelligence’?

Boru

[Alan V]

Do you have your own unique definition of ‘intelligence’?

Boru

Panpan defines himself as intelligent so he doesn't have to work at it.

[Paleophyte]

Man is not simply a “possessor” of DNA, but a manifestation of the intelligence of DNA. Every cell, thought, action and creation of man is an extension of the same functional mechanism: Perception → Organization → Action. Therefore, man is DNA in evolution, and his intelligence is an integral part of the intelligence of Nature. The creation of Artificial Intelligence by man is, ultimately, an act of DNA through man, confirming the Second Absolute Law. Man is therefore the intelligent DNA.

No, it isn't. DNA has no intelligence. Also, you aren't the product of just your DNA. There's no gene that codes for Beethoven's 9th or Einstein's theories. You're a product of your environment too, nature and nurture. Your 'laws' are simply wrong.