Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 28, 2024, 6:09 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What would you consider to be evidence for God?
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(November 4, 2015 at 4:21 pm)snowtracks Wrote:
(October 30, 2015 at 11:40 pm)IATIA Wrote: The fact remains that your god has utterly failed to convince me that it exists.  So again, it is either impotent or non-existent.
Everyone is convinced of God's existence*; not everyone accepts God's authority which is the exercise of their God given 'free-will'. Remember, the Garden-of-Eden was made 'very good' (not perfect like some think), and then God made it even better by introduction free will.  

*Romans 1:20  For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

Just because it says it in a book don't make it so.
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
Do people think people quoting from their holy texts are always trying to prove their point to Atheists from the holy text or that just to reinforce that their view is not unique but is believed by their believing community and is supported by their holy text as well? Rather then saying "Believe in this look I quoted from the Bible", they are saying this is what I believe and it's the view of the Bible?
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(November 4, 2015 at 9:14 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Do people think people quoting from their holy texts are always trying to prove their point to Atheists from the holy text or that just to reinforce that their view is not unique but is believed by their believing community and is supported by their holy text as well? Rather then saying "Believe in this look I quoted from the Bible", they are saying this is what I believe and it's the view of the Bible?

I think there is a missing step in the cognition.

It's more, "This is true because it's in the book [and I believe the book to be true]".
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
It's true because it's in the book, and the book is true because it's full of true things.

Except when it's obviously false, which is most of the time. Whoops.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsrRAwH-jLI
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(November 4, 2015 at 8:10 pm)Kitan Wrote:
(November 4, 2015 at 4:21 pm)snowtracks Wrote: Everyone is convinced of God's existence*

Everyone is convinced of the Flying Spaghetti Monster's existence*

*Pastafarian 1:20 For since the creation of the world FSM's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

I see your FSM and raise you one Ceiling Cat.

Romans 1:20 Wen Ceiling Cat maed teh urths, ppls cud see he has invisible powers, an so they has no excus.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
The fool hath said in his heart, "There is no spaghetti."

And if you believe in FSM believe also in his son, the meatball.
The god who allows children to be raped out of respect for the free will choice of the rapist, but punishes gay men for engaging in mutually consensual sex couldn't possibly be responsible for an intelligently designed universe.

I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.

Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire

Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(November 5, 2015 at 4:05 pm)Stimbo Wrote:
(November 4, 2015 at 8:10 pm)Kitan Wrote: Everyone is convinced of the Flying Spaghetti Monster's existence*

*Pastafarian 1:20  For since the creation of the world FSM's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

I see your FSM and raise you one Ceiling Cat.

Romans 1:20 Wen Ceiling Cat maed teh urths, ppls cud see he has invisible powers, an so they has no excus.

By faith we understand that spaghetti sauce is really his transubstantiated blood that was shed for our sins.
The god who allows children to be raped out of respect for the free will choice of the rapist, but punishes gay men for engaging in mutually consensual sex couldn't possibly be responsible for an intelligently designed universe.

I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.

Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire

Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(November 4, 2015 at 9:14 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Do people think people quoting from their holy texts are always trying to prove their point to Atheists from the holy text or that just to reinforce that their view is not unique but is believed by their believing community and is supported by their holy text as well? Rather then saying "Believe in this look I quoted from the Bible", they are saying this is what I believe and it's the view of the Bible?
When I post, I’m not trying to ‘Prove‘, persuade, cajole or influence board members to believe in God’s existence or even change their worldview to a creation model. Think about it, if God gave people free will to choose, I should and do fully endorse the exercise thereof; without it humans are nothing but puppets. Besides, everyone believes in God. Scripture never says ‘some THINK there is no God’, what it says is ‘some SAY there is no God’. This board I presume has been established for more then atheists telling each other how wonderful they are.
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(November 4, 2015 at 4:21 pm)snowtracks Wrote:
(October 30, 2015 at 11:40 pm)IATIA Wrote: The fact remains that your god has utterly failed to convince me that it exists.  So again, it is either impotent or non-existent.
Everyone is convinced of God's existence*; not everyone accepts God's authority which is the exercise of their God given 'free-will'. Remember, the Garden-of-Eden was made 'very good' (not perfect like some think), and then God made it even better by introduction free will.  



*Romans 1:20  For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

Tell that to your fellow theist Drich! He thinks that Romans 1:20 doesn't mean that all people are aware of God's existence.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Veridical NDEs: Evidence/Proof of the Soul and the After-Life? Nishant Xavier 34 3378 July 17, 2024 at 7:34 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Dear Atheists: what would convince you God/Christ is Real? JJoseph 209 22013 June 12, 2024 at 10:54 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  If you learned that the god of [insert religion] is real, would all bets be off? Sicnoo0 59 8332 June 12, 2024 at 10:38 pm
Last Post: Prycejosh1987
  The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Nishant Xavier 38 4181 August 7, 2023 at 10:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  When were the Gospels Written? The External and Internal Evidence. Nishant Xavier 62 5270 August 6, 2023 at 10:25 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Isaiah 53, 700 B.C: Historical Evidence of the Divine Omniscience. Nishant Xavier 91 7435 August 6, 2023 at 2:19 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. Nishant Xavier 162 15149 July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning. Nishant Xavier 54 4697 July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Why the resurrection accounts are not evidence LinuxGal 5 1295 October 29, 2022 at 2:01 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Can you consider Atheism an ethnicity UniverseCaptain 31 4162 September 27, 2021 at 7:23 pm
Last Post: UniverseCaptain



Users browsing this thread: 31 Guest(s)