If NDEs are supposed to be proof of an afterlife - how come they're not called "Death Experiences"? Hmmm? :all-fucking-ears:

I have a near-death experience every second of every day. I could suddenly die of a heart attack, or be shot by a sniper, or an asteroid could hit the planet and kill me. I'm always one second away from potential death somehow. I'm as fragile as a glass house made of shitty glass. We all are.

However, angels are real, obviously. All the other stuff is fake, because I said so.

(December 3, 2015 at 6:57 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote:

(December 3, 2015 at 6:52 am)Little Rik Wrote: What sort of hypocrite are you beanie?  
First you swear direct to me for no reason then you climb the pulpit of morality by saying that i am disrespectful.  
Get lost hypocrite.  

Could you please answer my post regarding the world's biggest study into NDE's? 

Quite wonderfully, it actually points to something you have been arguing against, that consciousness comes from the brain....... patients being "aware" for up to 3 minutes after being pronounced clinically dead.  You know which part of the body was the only part still active in every single case?
Go on, I'll let you guess.

Sure, sure i guess.
In the meantime can you show me the study you are talking about?  

I changed my mind. Angels are fake, obviously, but all the other stuff is real because I said so.

I'm not prostitutizing, just stating my rapidly changing opinion.

(December 3, 2015 at 7:02 am)Redbeard The Pink Wrote:

(December 3, 2015 at 6:52 am)Little Rik Wrote: What sort of hypocrite are you beanie?  
First you swear direct to me for no reason then you climb the pulpit of morality by saying that i am disrespectful.  
Get lost hypocrite.  

Swearing isn't against the rules, Rik. Blatant, unsupported preaching, on the other hand, is against the rules. There's nothing hypocritical about wanting you to fuck off with your ignorant, rude proselytizing, fucker.

Stim already explained that swearing is not against the rule so i didn't really mean that beanie.
I instead point out that you are an hypocrite because you are talking about morality.
Swearing direct to someone for no reason goes against the morality that you try to held in esteem.
Are you getting now?  

(December 3, 2015 at 7:26 am)Little Rik Wrote:

(December 3, 2015 at 7:02 am)Redbeard The Pink Wrote: Swearing isn't against the rules, Rik. Blatant, unsupported preaching, on the other hand, is against the rules. There's nothing hypocritical about wanting you to fuck off with your ignorant, rude proselytizing, fucker.

Stim already explained that swearing is not against the rule so i didn't really mean that beanie.
I instead point out that you are an hypocrite because you are talking about morality.
Swearing direct to someone for no reason goes against the morality that you try to held in esteem.
Are you getting now?  

Go back and read the post where I asked why you haven't been banned yet. Point out the part where I'm talking about "morality." Then go back and read the post where I told you to shut the fuck up.

I'm going to be open minded today, which apparently means believing everything that anyone says to me.

Go! This offer won't last.

(December 3, 2015 at 7:25 am)robvalue Wrote: I changed my mind. Angels are fake, obviously, but all the other stuff is real because I said so.
I'm not prostitutizing, just stating my rapidly changing opinion.

To find out whether something is real or not you got to use the correct type of science.
Unfortunately atheists keep on banging their heads on the hard brick wall in the believe that physical science can explain what is not physical.
No wonder they will never understand how the whole system works.  

(December 3, 2015 at 7:30 am)Redbeard The Pink Wrote:

(December 3, 2015 at 7:26 am)Little Rik Wrote: Stim already explained that swearing is not against the rule so i didn't really mean that beanie.
I instead point out that you are an hypocrite because you are talking about morality.
Swearing direct to someone for no reason goes against the morality that you try to held in esteem.
Are you getting now?  

Go back and read the post where I asked why you haven't been banned yet. Point out the part where I'm talking about "morality." Then go back and read the post where I told you to shut the fuck up.

You said.....disrespectful........which relate to not following the moral code in use in human relationship.
So yes you are an hypocrite because you brake this code by swearing direct to me for no reason and at the same time you pretend to teach morality.  

(December 3, 2015 at 7:47 am)Little Rik Wrote:

(December 3, 2015 at 7:30 am)Redbeard The Pink Wrote: Go back and read the post where I asked why you haven't been banned yet. Point out the part where I'm talking about "morality." Then go back and read the post where I told you to shut the fuck up.

You said.....disrespectful........which relate to not following the moral code in use in human relationship.
So yes you are an hypocrite because you brake this code by swearing direct to me for no reason and at the same time you pretend to teach morality.  

Just because I used the word "disrespectful," doesn't mean I was talking about the moral ramifications of all human interactions, fuck-stick. I was talking about forum rules, which expressly forbid preaching at us, failing to support your assertions, and then treating us as if we're stupid just because we don't believe your unsupported bullshit.