Posts: 4238
Threads: 29
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
9
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
February 21, 2016 at 9:47 am
(February 20, 2016 at 11:11 pm)pool the great Wrote: To show his love duh! Remember,if you don't sin Jesus died for nothing.
According the Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ he survived the cross and went on to die of old age in Kashmir but again after 2000 years is very difficult to know the truth.
Posts: 9147
Threads: 83
Joined: May 22, 2013
Reputation:
46
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
February 21, 2016 at 9:47 am
(February 20, 2016 at 3:52 pm)comet Wrote: I have no idea why they have to have "god" die, wake up, and then fly away. Whats up with that?
How else will you know that it's time to roll 2d6 to loot the dragon's gold chest?
Posts: 18544
Threads: 145
Joined: March 18, 2015
Reputation:
100
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
February 21, 2016 at 10:14 am
This thread is still alive?
Someone should kill it before it lays eggs.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work. If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now. Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Posts: 50
Threads: 5
Joined: January 27, 2015
Reputation:
0
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
February 22, 2016 at 10:03 pm
If we were to assume that your primary post is still relevant almost a year on now;
You make assumptions that cells have consciousness, why? Also, consciousness is elaborate. How do you know what does and does not possess consciousness?
I'd also like to point out that Atheism doesn't in any way claim outright that death means the end of everything. We don't know what it means. That's what Atheism is about; admitting we simply don't know.
Posts: 4238
Threads: 29
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
9
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
February 23, 2016 at 5:49 am
(February 22, 2016 at 10:03 pm)Living in Death Wrote: If we were to assume that your primary post is still relevant almost a year on now;
You make assumptions that cells have consciousness, why? Also, consciousness is elaborate. How do you know what does and does not possess consciousness?
Because the yoga that i follow is a science that study both the physical world and what is behind this
visible world.
Everything is made of consciousness.
People laugh when i tell that even stones have consciousness but when i ask why some matter release uranium they do not know why.
Energy has got to be there and energy and consciousness are the two side of the same coin.
Intellectual falsely believe that Darwin discovered the lot when in fact he only discovered the crumbs
of a big cake.
To say that survival trigger evolution is solid crap.
Evolution is trigger by the awakening of the consciousness in the matter.
From here it evolve into plants, animal life and human life.
The more the consciousness awake and the more life evolve.
Darwin didn't fully get it.
What happened with the animals that he studied happen even with humans.
You must have noticed how some people
keep their body in perfect nick while other people get fat and sick or why some people put more effort in studying while other people wouldn't care less.
This is not about survival.
This is about vision driven by a better developed consciousness so survival has absolutely nothing to do with evolution as Darwin and those idiots that believe in Darwin think.
Talking about consciousness in cells i already post a study done by someone competent on the issue
few weeks ago.
Just scroll some pages back to see it or you can google to find a lot of information about it.
https://www.google.com.au/webhp?sourceid...sciousness
Quote:I'd also like to point out that Atheism doesn't in any way claim outright that death means the end of everything. We don't know what it means. That's what Atheism is about; admitting we simply don't know.
There are atheists and atheists.
Most of them have a strong believe that with the physical death everything is over.
When i started talk about NDEs most of them had a strong believe that that is the case
so i don't believe that you talk for them all.
Posts: 977
Threads: 11
Joined: July 17, 2015
Reputation:
9
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
February 23, 2016 at 6:01 am
(February 23, 2016 at 5:49 am)Little Rik Wrote: (February 22, 2016 at 10:03 pm)Living in Death Wrote: If we were to assume that your primary post is still relevant almost a year on now;
You make assumptions that cells have consciousness, why? Also, consciousness is elaborate. How do you know what does and does not possess consciousness?
Because the yoga that i follow is a science that study both the physical world and what is behind this
visible world.
Everything is made of consciousness.
People laugh when i tell that even stones have consciousness but when i ask why some matter release uranium they do not know why.
Energy has got to be there and energy and consciousness are the two side of the same coin.
Intellectual falsely believe that Darwin discovered the lot when in fact he only discovered the crumbs
of a big cake.
To say that survival trigger evolution is solid crap.
Evolution is trigger by the awakening of the consciousness in the matter.
From here it evolve into plants, animal life and human life.
The more the consciousness awake and the more life evolve.
Darwin didn't fully get it.
What happened with the animals that he studied happen even with humans.
You must have noticed how some people
keep their body in perfect nick while other people get fat and sick or why some people put more effort in studying while other people wouldn't care less.
This is not about survival.
This is about vision driven by a better developed consciousness so survival has absolutely nothing to do with evolution as Darwin and those idiots that believe in Darwin think.
Talking about consciousness in cells i already post a study done by someone competent on the issue
few weeks ago.
Just scroll some pages back to see it or you can google to find a lot of information about it.
https://www.google.com.au/webhp?sourceid...sciousness
Quote:I'd also like to point out that Atheism doesn't in any way claim outright that death means the end of everything. We don't know what it means. That's what Atheism is about; admitting we simply don't know.
There are atheists and atheists.
Most of them have a strong believe that with the physical death everything is over.
When i started talk about NDEs most of them had a strong believe that that is the case
so i don't believe that you talk for them all.
Biggest NDE study showed nothing, zip. Nada. Not a fucking thing. When presented with this, the biggest NDE study in the world, you claim the people who ran it didn't know what they were looking for.
You are full of shit.
You may refer to me as "Oh High One."
Posts: 4238
Threads: 29
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
9
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
February 23, 2016 at 6:12 am
(February 23, 2016 at 6:01 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote: (February 23, 2016 at 5:49 am)Little Rik Wrote: Because the yoga that i follow is a science that study both the physical world and what is behind this
visible world.
Everything is made of consciousness.
People laugh when i tell that even stones have consciousness but when i ask why some matter release uranium they do not know why.
Energy has got to be there and energy and consciousness are the two side of the same coin.
Intellectual falsely believe that Darwin discovered the lot when in fact he only discovered the crumbs
of a big cake.
To say that survival trigger evolution is solid crap.
Evolution is trigger by the awakening of the consciousness in the matter.
From here it evolve into plants, animal life and human life.
The more the consciousness awake and the more life evolve.
Darwin didn't fully get it.
What happened with the animals that he studied happen even with humans.
You must have noticed how some people
keep their body in perfect nick while other people get fat and sick or why some people put more effort in studying while other people wouldn't care less.
This is not about survival.
This is about vision driven by a better developed consciousness so survival has absolutely nothing to do with evolution as Darwin and those idiots that believe in Darwin think.
Talking about consciousness in cells i already post a study done by someone competent on the issue
few weeks ago.
Just scroll some pages back to see it or you can google to find a lot of information about it.
https://www.google.com.au/webhp?sourceid...sciousness
There are atheists and atheists.
Most of them have a strong believe that with the physical death everything is over.
When i started talk about NDEs most of them had a strong believe that that is the case
so i don't believe that you talk for them all.
Biggest NDE study showed nothing, zip. Nada. Not a fucking thing. When presented with this, the biggest NDE study in the world, you claim the people who ran it didn't know what they were looking for.
You are full of shit.
I got bad news for you son.
Neurosurgeon Dr. Eben Alexander already won all contests that try to debunked NDEs as real
so get lost.
People like you must be the reincarnation of that imbecile that laugh at the guy who said that the planet earth is not flat and is not the center of the universe.
Posts: 977
Threads: 11
Joined: July 17, 2015
Reputation:
9
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
February 23, 2016 at 6:25 am
(This post was last modified: February 23, 2016 at 6:26 am by SofaKingHigh.)
(February 23, 2016 at 6:12 am)Little Rik Wrote: (February 23, 2016 at 6:01 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote: Biggest NDE study showed nothing, zip. Nada. Not a fucking thing. When presented with this, the biggest NDE study in the world, you claim the people who ran it didn't know what they were looking for.
You are full of shit.
I got bad news for you son.
Neurosurgeon Dr. Eben Alexander already won all contests that try to debunked NDEs as real
so get lost.
People like you must be the reincarnation of that imbecile that laugh at the guy who said that the planet earth is not flat and is not the center of the universe.
Here's the difference between you and the scientific community you are so quick to rubbish prik. You have just disregarded the world's biggest study into NDE's, instead you believe the account of one charlatan's dream whilst suffering from a medially induced coma. Dr. Eben Alexander no doubt had an amazing experience....whilst he was in a coma. usually we call that dreaming, sometimes lucid dreaming.
However, Dr. Eben Alexander was a bit of a shit doctor wan't he prik? Not really the kind of guy you should be standing behind when going up against the worlds biggest study into NDE's. He was fired from multiple jobs, was the target of several malpractise lawsuits. He also stated in his book that the coma was a direct result of bacterial meningitis and he had "no higher brain activity" when in actual fact, his own doctor reported that this was not the case and that the coma was medically induced and that Dr. Eben Alexander was indeed hallucinating.
You do make this easy prikky.
By the way, bit of a tip, the first time you made that joke it fell flat on it's face, second time just makes you look even more retarded. I wouldn't repeat shit jokes, they make you look even dumber than you are, which is quite some feat, let me assure you.
You may refer to me as "Oh High One."
Posts: 280
Threads: 3
Joined: October 19, 2015
Reputation:
2
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
February 23, 2016 at 8:06 am
(February 22, 2016 at 10:03 pm)Living in Death Wrote: If we were to assume that your primary post is still relevant almost a year on now;
You make assumptions that cells have consciousness, why? Also, consciousness is elaborate. How do you know what does and does not possess consciousness?
I'd also like to point out that Atheism doesn't in any way claim outright that death means the end of everything. We don't know what it means. That's what Atheism is about; admitting we simply don't know.
You're trying to talk reason to a person that claims "Yoga" discovered evolution and that water has consciousness.
Posts: 5356
Threads: 178
Joined: June 28, 2015
Reputation:
35
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
February 23, 2016 at 8:28 am
Quote:Because the yoga that i follow is a science that study both the physical world and what is behind this physical world.
Can you share some yoga practices that is assosiated with the interaction of what is behind this physical world? It would be lovely if you described how you perform these practices as well. Like do a head stand and breathe out of one nose? Please, tell us, prove you authenticity.
|