Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 29, 2024, 3:04 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
(February 20, 2016 at 11:11 pm)pool the great Wrote: To show his love duh! Remember,if you don't sin Jesus died for nothing.



According the Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ he survived the cross and went on to die of old age in Kashmir but again after 2000 years is very difficult to know the truth.  Rolleyes
Reply
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
(February 20, 2016 at 3:52 pm)comet Wrote: I have no idea why they have to have "god" die, wake up, and then fly away.  Whats up with that?

How else will you know that it's time to roll 2d6 to loot the dragon's gold chest?
Reply
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
This thread is still alive?

Someone should kill it before it lays eggs.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand. 
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work.  If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now.  Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Reply
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
If we were to assume that your primary post is still relevant almost a year on now;

You make assumptions that cells have consciousness, why? Also, consciousness is elaborate. How do you know what does and does not possess consciousness?

I'd also like to point out that Atheism doesn't in any way claim outright that death means the end of everything. We don't know what it means. That's what Atheism is about; admitting we simply don't know.
Reply
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
(February 22, 2016 at 10:03 pm)Living in Death Wrote: If we were to assume that your primary post is still relevant almost a year on now;
You make assumptions that cells have consciousness, why? Also, consciousness is elaborate. How do you know what does and does not possess consciousness?


Because the yoga that i follow is a science that study both the physical world and what is behind this
visible world.
Everything is made of consciousness.
People laugh when i tell that even stones have consciousness but when i ask why some matter release uranium they do not know why.
Energy has got to be there and energy and consciousness are the two side of the same coin.
Intellectual falsely believe that Darwin discovered the lot when in fact he only discovered the crumbs
of a big cake.
To say that survival trigger evolution is solid crap.
Evolution is trigger by the awakening of the consciousness in the matter.
From here it evolve into plants, animal life and human life.
The more the consciousness awake and the more life evolve.
Darwin didn't fully get it.
What happened with the animals that he studied happen even with humans.
You must have noticed how some people
keep their body in perfect nick while other people get fat and sick or why some people put more effort in studying while other people wouldn't care less.
This is not about survival.
This is about vision driven by a better developed consciousness so survival has absolutely nothing to do with evolution as Darwin and those idiots that believe in Darwin think.
Talking about consciousness in cells i already post a study done by someone competent on the issue
few weeks ago.
Just scroll some pages back to see it or you can google to find a lot of information about it.

https://www.google.com.au/webhp?sourceid...sciousness


Quote:I'd also like to point out that Atheism doesn't in any way claim outright that death means the end of everything. We don't know what it means. That's what Atheism is about; admitting we simply don't know.


There are atheists and atheists.
Most of them have a strong believe that with the physical death everything is over.
When i started talk about NDEs most of them had a strong believe that that is the case
so i don't believe that you talk for them all.
Reply
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
(February 23, 2016 at 5:49 am)Little Rik Wrote:
(February 22, 2016 at 10:03 pm)Living in Death Wrote: If we were to assume that your primary post is still relevant almost a year on now;
You make assumptions that cells have consciousness, why? Also, consciousness is elaborate. How do you know what does and does not possess consciousness?


Because the yoga that i follow is a science that study both the physical world and what is behind this
visible world.
Everything is made of consciousness.
People laugh when i tell that even stones have consciousness but when i ask why some matter release uranium they do not know why.
Energy has got to be there and energy and consciousness are the two side of the same coin.
Intellectual falsely believe that Darwin discovered the lot when in fact he only discovered the crumbs
of a big cake.
To say that survival trigger evolution is solid crap.
Evolution is trigger by the awakening of the consciousness in the matter.
From here it evolve into plants, animal life and human life.
The more the consciousness awake and the more life evolve.
Darwin didn't fully get it.
What happened with the animals that he studied happen even with humans.
You must have noticed how some people
keep their body in perfect nick while other people get fat and sick or why some people put more effort in studying while other people wouldn't care less.
This is not about survival.
This is about vision driven by a better developed consciousness so survival has absolutely nothing to do with evolution as Darwin and those idiots that believe in Darwin think.
Talking about consciousness in cells i already post a study done by someone competent on the issue
few weeks ago.
Just scroll some pages back to see it or you can google to find a lot of information about it.

https://www.google.com.au/webhp?sourceid...sciousness


Quote:I'd also like to point out that Atheism doesn't in any way claim outright that death means the end of everything. We don't know what it means. That's what Atheism is about; admitting we simply don't know.


There are atheists and atheists.
Most of them have a strong believe that with the physical death everything is over.
When i started talk about NDEs most of them had a strong believe that that is the case
so i don't believe that you talk for them all.

Biggest NDE study showed nothing, zip.  Nada.  Not a fucking thing.  When presented with this, the biggest NDE study in the world, you claim the people who ran it didn't know what they were looking for.

You are full of shit. 

[Image: zo9yd.jpg]
You may refer to me as "Oh High One."
Reply
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
(February 23, 2016 at 6:01 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote:
(February 23, 2016 at 5:49 am)Little Rik Wrote: Because the yoga that i follow is a science that study both the physical world and what is behind this
visible world.
Everything is made of consciousness.
People laugh when i tell that even stones have consciousness but when i ask why some matter release uranium they do not know why.
Energy has got to be there and energy and consciousness are the two side of the same coin.
Intellectual falsely believe that Darwin discovered the lot when in fact he only discovered the crumbs
of a big cake.
To say that survival trigger evolution is solid crap.
Evolution is trigger by the awakening of the consciousness in the matter.
From here it evolve into plants, animal life and human life.
The more the consciousness awake and the more life evolve.
Darwin didn't fully get it.
What happened with the animals that he studied happen even with humans.
You must have noticed how some people
keep their body in perfect nick while other people get fat and sick or why some people put more effort in studying while other people wouldn't care less.
This is not about survival.
This is about vision driven by a better developed consciousness so survival has absolutely nothing to do with evolution as Darwin and those idiots that believe in Darwin think.
Talking about consciousness in cells i already post a study done by someone competent on the issue
few weeks ago.
Just scroll some pages back to see it or you can google to find a lot of information about it.

https://www.google.com.au/webhp?sourceid...sciousness




There are atheists and atheists.
Most of them have a strong believe that with the physical death everything is over.
When i started talk about NDEs most of them had a strong believe that that is the case
so i don't believe that you talk for them all.

Biggest NDE study showed nothing, zip.  Nada.  Not a fucking thing.  When presented with this, the biggest NDE study in the world, you claim the people who ran it didn't know what they were looking for.
You are full of shit.


I got bad news for you son. Banging Head On Desk
Neurosurgeon Dr. Eben Alexander already won all contests that try to debunked NDEs as real
so get lost.

People like you must be the reincarnation of that imbecile that laugh at the guy who said that the planet earth is not flat and is not the center of the universe.  Wink
Reply
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
(February 23, 2016 at 6:12 am)Little Rik Wrote:
(February 23, 2016 at 6:01 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote: Biggest NDE study showed nothing, zip.  Nada.  Not a fucking thing.  When presented with this, the biggest NDE study in the world, you claim the people who ran it didn't know what they were looking for.
You are full of shit.


I got bad news for you son.  Banging Head On Desk
Neurosurgeon Dr. Eben Alexander already won all contests that try to debunked NDEs as real
so get lost.

People like you must be the reincarnation of that imbecile that laugh at the guy who said that the planet earth is not flat and is not the center of the universe.  Wink

ROFLOL 

Here's the difference between you and the scientific community you are so quick to rubbish prik.  You have just disregarded the world's biggest study into NDE's, instead you believe the account of one charlatan's dream whilst suffering from a medially induced coma.  Dr. Eben Alexander no doubt had an amazing experience....whilst he was in a coma.  usually we call that dreaming, sometimes lucid dreaming. 

However, Dr. Eben Alexander was a bit of a shit doctor wan't he prik?  Not really the kind of guy you should be standing behind when going up against the worlds biggest study into NDE's.  He was fired from multiple jobs, was the target of several malpractise lawsuits.  He also stated in his book that the coma was a direct result of bacterial meningitis and he had "no higher brain activity" when in actual fact, his own doctor reported that this was not the case and that the coma was medically induced and that Dr. Eben Alexander was indeed hallucinating.

You do make this easy prikky.




By the way, bit of a tip, the first time you made that joke it fell flat on it's face, second time just makes you look even more retarded.  I wouldn't repeat shit jokes, they make you look even dumber than you are, which is quite some feat, let me assure you.
You may refer to me as "Oh High One."
Reply
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
(February 22, 2016 at 10:03 pm)Living in Death Wrote: If we were to assume that your primary post is still relevant almost a year on now;

You make assumptions that cells have consciousness, why? Also, consciousness is elaborate. How do you know what does and does not possess consciousness?

I'd also like to point out that Atheism doesn't in any way claim outright that death means the end of everything. We don't know what it means. That's what Atheism is about; admitting we simply don't know.

You're trying to talk reason to a person that claims "Yoga" discovered evolution and that water has consciousness.
Reply
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
Quote:Because the yoga that i follow is a science that study both the physical world and what is behind this physical world.


Can you share some yoga practices that is assosiated with the interaction of what is behind this physical world? It would be lovely if you described how you perform these practices as well. Like do a head stand and breathe out of one nose? Please, tell us, prove you authenticity.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Christian and Atheism Worldwide Demographics: Current Realities and Future Trends. Nishant Xavier 55 4426 July 9, 2023 at 6:07 am
Last Post: no one
  How do I deal with the belief that maybe... Just maybe... God exists and I'm... Gentle_Idiot 75 8919 November 23, 2022 at 5:34 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  How may one refute the religious stonewall argument "all is one"? Osopatata 29 3453 December 21, 2020 at 4:05 pm
Last Post: HappySkeptic
  Philosophical Failures of Christian Apologetics, Part 11: The Holy Spirit Cepheus Ace 18 3766 June 22, 2020 at 7:45 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Belief in God is a clinic Interaktive 55 7616 April 1, 2019 at 10:55 pm
Last Post: LostLocke
  Is atheism a belief? Agnostico 1023 109047 March 16, 2019 at 1:42 pm
Last Post: Catharsis
  Isn't Atheism anti Christian than anti religious? Western part atleast Kibbi 14 3893 October 5, 2018 at 9:09 pm
Last Post: Dr H
  Do you know that homeopathy doesn't work, or do you just lack belief that it does? I_am_not_mafia 24 6230 August 25, 2018 at 4:34 am
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Two Myths I Wish Atheists Would Stop Buying Into Rhondazvous 26 5503 June 7, 2018 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: chimp3
  Why Atheism/Secular Humanism... Part II TheReal 53 27298 April 23, 2018 at 4:48 pm
Last Post: Mystic



Users browsing this thread: 124 Guest(s)