Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Proving God in 20 statements
April 1, 2016 at 4:56 am
(This post was last modified: April 1, 2016 at 5:01 am by Alex K.)
If it had been a proof in 7 or 5*5 statements or so I would have been more convinced. 20 seems like a not very godly and arbitrary number. Shouldn't the proof of God have a nice number of steps?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 23188
Threads: 26
Joined: February 2, 2010
Reputation:
106
RE: Proving God in 20 statements
April 1, 2016 at 5:02 am
(April 1, 2016 at 4:49 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I'm with Alex on this.
Quote:There are no uncaused things
What does this actually mean ? Aside from the statement being vague enough to not be utile, it may very well be false.
Boru
... and if it's true, what caused the Causer?
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Proving God in 20 statements
April 1, 2016 at 5:15 am
(This post was last modified: April 1, 2016 at 5:16 am by Alex K.)
(April 1, 2016 at 5:02 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: (April 1, 2016 at 4:49 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I'm with Alex on this.
What does this actually mean ? Aside from the statement being vague enough to not be utile, it may very well be false.
Boru
... and if it's true, what caused the Causer?
Nothing. And for that to work you have to argue that the Causer is not a thing
Welcome to atheism! Proven in one step, which is much better than 20. 
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 18544
Threads: 145
Joined: March 18, 2015
Reputation:
100
RE: Proving God in 20 statements
April 1, 2016 at 5:49 am
That OP made my head hurt.
I'm telling!!
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work. If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now. Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Posts: 1633
Threads: 33
Joined: March 14, 2016
Reputation:
23
RE: Proving God in 20 statements
April 1, 2016 at 8:04 am
God of the gaps everytime. "We don't know the answer, therefore geud". "We don't see another answer, therefore jebus". Like Rob said: arguments aren't evidence for god.
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Proving God in 20 statements
April 1, 2016 at 8:06 am
(This post was last modified: April 1, 2016 at 8:07 am by robvalue.)
I think we've heard all we're going to get now, so let's take a vote. If you think God doesn't exist, raise your left hand. If you don't think God does exist, raise your right and your left hand.
Posts: 5690
Threads: 8
Joined: April 3, 2014
Reputation:
68
RE: Proving God in 20 statements
April 1, 2016 at 8:10 am
Ignoramus, you missed the second verse.
2,4,6,8, bog in don't wait.
Wrap your legs around the table,
Fill your belly while your able. :-)
Posts: 7259
Threads: 506
Joined: December 12, 2015
Reputation:
22
RE: Proving God in 20 statements
April 1, 2016 at 8:22 am
(This post was last modified: April 1, 2016 at 8:23 am by Jehanne.)
God does not talk to me; if he/she/it did, I would talk back to him/her/it.
Posts: 34
Threads: 1
Joined: March 28, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: Proving God in 20 statements
April 1, 2016 at 4:06 pm
Thanks guys (and gals) for taking the time to respond.
For those arguing the no uncaused things /quantum fluctuations, etc. premise, this was addressed in notes (i), (ii) and (iii) of the proof.
I'll keep checking back for more responses.
Oh, I did copy and paste the proof from my own website (which I can't post here as I'm a newbie). I do explain more on the proof and Gödel there (the website).
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Proving God in 20 statements
April 1, 2016 at 4:11 pm
(This post was last modified: April 1, 2016 at 4:11 pm by Alex K.)
(April 1, 2016 at 4:06 pm)smfortune Wrote: Thanks guys (and gals) for taking the time to respond.
For those arguing the no uncaused things /quantum fluctuations, etc. premise, this was addressed in notes (i), (ii) and (iii) of the proof.
That's not what we argued. You need to establish what the word means in the context, and then that the premise so defined is true.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
|
