Politico reports:

"Their message to moderate Republicans: She represents your values better than Trump."

She's more concerned about appealing to Republican donors than to people who voted for Senator Sanders. More proof, if ever you needed it, that Hilary is evil. Why is Hilary pleading with Republican donors?

Corporate shill. Plain and simple. Not evil. Just business as usual. I really don't envy Americans having to vote for that kind of selection. Not that it would be much better where I live, but pinching the noses to vote for something not as bad as the alternative seems to become the global standard. Well, at the very least 4 years where America doesn't make any progress. At worst, global chaos.

It's quite telling that she's trying to reach out to republicans, instead of scoring some Bernie voters.

(May 7, 2016 at 4:29 pm)Chad32 Wrote: It's quite telling that she's trying to reach out to republicans, instead of scoring some Bernie voters.

Millennials and people with common sense plainly do not like her

Indeed, but if she actually made some concessions, and kept her word, she could get it. Instead she proves that she really is just a center right democrat because she feels it will be easier to try to get republican votes than democratic votes.

(May 7, 2016 at 5:13 pm)Chad32 Wrote: Indeed, but if she actually made some concessions, and kept her word, she could get it. Instead she proves that she really is just a center right democrat because she feels it will be easier to try to get republican votes than democratic votes.

The biggest thing is she has no integrity she is easily bought that's the scary thing a very scary thing. 
Add onto the fact of she is a very shady person and the scandals as well. I can bring up Glass Steagall all day 
and that should pretty  much be turn off for her voters she played a role in ruining the economy Glass Steagall 
and repealing it gave banks so much power... to play with money and effectively fucked us over in the end. 
Were a wealthy country our GDP per state is amazing yet our infrastructure, schools, cost of living, homeless, insurance
etc. Makes you wonder were a rich country but we can't take care of our own selves because banks would cry wolf saying
no you may not do that. Oh the infrastructure is terrible well not our problem. In reality the banks should not have power over 
tax payer dollars yet it does. Were not a great country i hate to say that i really do and it hurts were a terrible country that
can't take care of itself without someone getting upset when we do spend money to improve things.

(May 7, 2016 at 5:13 pm)Chad32 Wrote: Indeed, but if she actually made some concessions, and kept her word...

She'd have to find her integrity first.

(May 7, 2016 at 6:40 pm)Faith No More Wrote:

(May 7, 2016 at 5:13 pm)Chad32 Wrote: Indeed, but if she actually made some concessions, and kept her word...

She'd have to find her integrity first.

Point taken - and I don't like her any more than you do I think - but there's a very shrewd reason for doing so: Bernie voters are overwhelmingly unlikely to vote for Drumpf, moderate Republicans much more so, I'd wager. I don't necessarily think she's going to get too many takers, but if she gets even a fraction of the moderates, it's a big coup.

(May 7, 2016 at 6:55 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Point taken - and I don't like her any more than you do I think - but there's a very shrewd reason for doing so: Bernie voters are overwhelmingly unlikely to vote for Drumpf, moderate Republicans much more so, I'd wager.  I don't necessarily think she's going to get too many takers, but if she gets even a fraction of the moderates, it's a big coup.

The danger doesn't lie in who's voting for whom but in who's staying at home. Radicals are far easier motivated than moderates. Especially when no desirable alternative is presented.

I wasn't aware that Bernie voters were radicals.

ETA: On further reflection it seems pretty unlikely a signoficant number of radicals would vote for either on a dare.