Posts: 624
Threads: 1
Joined: December 4, 2015
Reputation:
1
RE: Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 20, 2016 at 5:47 pm
(May 20, 2016 at 4:54 pm)Stimbo Wrote: (May 20, 2016 at 4:49 pm)AAA Wrote: No, but you say it doesn't contain features of design. Then I ask what features could it have that would make it count as design and you refuse to give some. Do you want it to have the ability to communicate using electrical signals? Do you want it to be able to repair itself? Do you want it to read an information dense code? Oh wait, it does all those things. Just tell me one characteristic of a designed sytems that life doesn't have
You're the one trying to make a case for design. You supply the evidence. See, it's not up to me to make your case for you and then refute it.
Are you afraid to mention a quality because you're afraid they might have it and you're just not aware of it?
Posts: 1633
Threads: 33
Joined: March 14, 2016
Reputation:
23
RE: Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 20, 2016 at 5:47 pm
(This post was last modified: May 20, 2016 at 5:47 pm by RozKek.)
I believed in god, I started searching for evidence, found none, the end.
Posts: 8277
Threads: 47
Joined: September 12, 2015
Reputation:
42
RE: Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 20, 2016 at 5:49 pm
(May 20, 2016 at 11:42 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: (May 20, 2016 at 11:23 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: Ugh...what is their end game then, if it's intentional? In AAA's case, is it just to stir the pot for the fun of it? Or do you think he actually believes he can sucker someone into believing?
Part of it is simply fooling themselves. They work in small social circles of like-minded persons, and they repeat something "around the circle" until everyone THEY know agrees with it, so Therefore It Must Be True™. This is commonly found in religion-based universities, but is not unique to them. After a while, they think they represent a valid counter-view because they've managed to block out the counter-narrative. [Edit to Add: The "counter-narrative" here being the actual, primary narrative that they're trying to block. Sorry for the poor phrasing!]
And it gets worse, there is lots of evidence to show that once you come to a belief, then even being shown evidence opposing your belief (even to the level of discrediting it like AAA's beloved creatardism) will push you to more extreme and strident holding of that belief. There is a stage where nothing will shift you from a wrong belief. Here's a good article on the phenomenon in a political context.
I honestly think that AAA is at this stage with respect to ID and creatardism, and no amount of the rest of us pointing out the sheer ridiculousness of his arguments or the wrongness of his beliefs is going to change them. He has taken on his beliefs too strongly, invested too much emotional effort into them and has owned them so totally that any challenge no matter how well argued or cited is going to do anything but strengthen his wrong belief.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Posts: 3101
Threads: 10
Joined: September 7, 2015
Reputation:
49
RE: Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 20, 2016 at 5:57 pm
Well that's depressing.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 20, 2016 at 5:57 pm
(May 20, 2016 at 5:47 pm)AAA Wrote: (May 20, 2016 at 4:54 pm)Stimbo Wrote: You're the one trying to make a case for design. You supply the evidence. See, it's not up to me to make your case for you and then refute it.
Are you afraid to mention a quality because you're afraid they might have it and you're just not aware of it?
You're the prosecution. I'm the jury. Make your case and I'll consider it.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 624
Threads: 1
Joined: December 4, 2015
Reputation:
1
RE: Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 20, 2016 at 5:58 pm
(May 20, 2016 at 4:57 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: (May 20, 2016 at 4:49 pm)AAA Wrote: No, but you say it doesn't contain features of design. Then I ask what features could it have that would make it count as design and you refuse to give some. Do you want it to have the ability to communicate using electrical signals? Do you want it to be able to repair itself? Do you want it to read an information dense code? Oh wait, it does all those things. Just tell me one characteristic of a designed sytems that life doesn't have
I don't know what features you'd expect to find that would count as evidence of design, since for there to be actual evidence of design, we'd need to see that something tampered with the natural processes that DNA (and the related chemistry) undergoes.
ID has proposed no such mechanism. All you do is point to anything that's not yet fully understood and say, "There! There's the gap! God's in that gap!", or you try to imply that a high degree of complexity that has developed over 4 billion years can only be explained by outside intervention. There is absolutely no reason to make such an assumption, nor can I even grasp what kind of evidence you'd put forth to try to suggest it is. Saying that it appears to be too complex to have occurred naturally isn't an argument, except The Argument from Personal Incredulity, unless you can show that there's no possible way a natural mechanism could be discovered that would explain the phenomenon... Irreducible Complexity is a poor argument, especially given that all of the original IC systems pointed out by Behe (for instance) have been shown to be naturally occurring.
In that case, you'd have literally the greatest discovery in the history of science-- namely, that magic is real. Everything that occurs without magic is simply biochemistry, and thus not ID. Show me how something could meddle in the pie, and how we'd spot that, and we can talk. "Too complex" is not an answer. "Appearance of" is worse.
So we need to prove that the designer exists before we can say it may have been designed? That's illogical. There are people searching for evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence. Do they have to prove that aliens exist before we can interpret a radio transmission showing a sequence of prime numbers as having an intelligent cause? NO.
It is only a God of the gap if you assume that your answer is correct and thus has the gaps to be filled. When you say that I have no proof that the designer exists, why can't I just say you are arguing from materialism of the gaps?
Why is it my responsibility to show that mutation and natural selection are inadequate? Shouldn't it be their responsibility to prove that it is adequate?
Please explain why design is magic? Did the person who designed your laptop use magic? I sort of doubt it.
Posts: 67292
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 20, 2016 at 6:00 pm
(This post was last modified: May 20, 2016 at 6:02 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
You need to show evidence that the -design- exists. Try to tackle that, before you worry about proof.
Modern Synth -has been- shown to be adequate. The burden of proof was accepted, a convincing demonstration was arranged. Many, many times. But just in case...this process is still being repeated, and people are trying their damndest to tear it down.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 624
Threads: 1
Joined: December 4, 2015
Reputation:
1
RE: Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 20, 2016 at 6:00 pm
(May 20, 2016 at 5:57 pm)Stimbo Wrote: (May 20, 2016 at 5:47 pm)AAA Wrote: Are you afraid to mention a quality because you're afraid they might have it and you're just not aware of it?
You're the prosecution. I'm the jury. Make your case and I'll consider it.
Ok, why is a system of electrical communication not considered evidence of intelligent design when the only known cause of such things is intelligence?
Posts: 624
Threads: 1
Joined: December 4, 2015
Reputation:
1
RE: Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 20, 2016 at 6:08 pm
(May 20, 2016 at 5:49 pm)Constable Dorfl Wrote: (May 20, 2016 at 11:42 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: Part of it is simply fooling themselves. They work in small social circles of like-minded persons, and they repeat something "around the circle" until everyone THEY know agrees with it, so Therefore It Must Be True™. This is commonly found in religion-based universities, but is not unique to them. After a while, they think they represent a valid counter-view because they've managed to block out the counter-narrative. [Edit to Add: The "counter-narrative" here being the actual, primary narrative that they're trying to block. Sorry for the poor phrasing!]
And it gets worse, there is lots of evidence to show that once you come to a belief, then even being shown evidence opposing your belief (even to the level of discrediting it like AAA's beloved creatardism) will push you to more extreme and strident holding of that belief. There is a stage where nothing will shift you from a wrong belief. Here's a good article on the phenomenon in a political context.
I honestly think that AAA is at this stage with respect to ID and creatardism, and no amount of the rest of us pointing out the sheer ridiculousness of his arguments or the wrongness of his beliefs is going to change them. He has taken on his beliefs too strongly, invested too much emotional effort into them and has owned them so totally that any challenge no matter how well argued or cited is going to do anything but strengthen his wrong belief. I'm glad you are immune to psychological biases constable dorfl. I am perfectly aware. I wrote like a 10 page paper on the topic of what psychological biases influence the decisions we come to this past semester for my brain and behavior class. I read The God Delusion and Signature in the Cell and compared the two.
Nobody has shown why it is rediculous to interpret the amazing intricacy of life as the result of a mind.
Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation:
37
RE: Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 20, 2016 at 6:09 pm
(May 20, 2016 at 4:49 pm)AAA Wrote: (May 20, 2016 at 3:42 pm)Stimbo Wrote: I'm not a designer. It's not my job to make the case for design.
No, but you say it doesn't contain features of design. Then I ask what features could it have that would make it count as design and you refuse to give some. Do you want it to have the ability to communicate using electrical signals? Do you want it to be able to repair itself? Do you want it to read an information dense code? Oh wait, it does all those things. Just tell me one characteristic of a designed sytems that life doesn't have
It would have been pretty damn bright of god if he/sh/it existed and gave us the ability to regrow limbs that would be a start.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
|
