RE: Orlando shooting/The non gun debate
June 14, 2016 at 12:51 pm
(This post was last modified: June 14, 2016 at 12:53 pm by account_inactive.)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 1, 2024, 12:38 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Orlando shooting/The non gun debate
|
 (June 14, 2016 at 8:16 am)Drich Wrote: So Im posting this to see what you all honestly feel. is this just another news item tailor made for the up comming election or is there/should their be a 9-11 feel to this? This appears to be just another day in America. As a religious country it has people angry at things that shouldn't bother them. A gay club should only annoy you if it plays the music too loud. You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid. Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.  (June 14, 2016 at 1:22 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:(June 14, 2016 at 8:16 am)Drich Wrote: So Im posting this to see what you all honestly feel. is this just another news item tailor made for the up comming election or is there/should their be a 9-11 feel to this? So, the Charlie Hebdo and the Paris shootings are what??? another day in France? France is not known for it's strong religious ties nor guns, and this very thing happened there twice... So then why do people who attacked those at a soccer game and cafe goers not seem to count as 'people angry at things that shouldn't bother them?'
Is radical islam a 'thing' that most of you are willing to acknowledge? I know Hillary and Obama seemed to have stricken that word from their lexicons.
I've got another question... If islam does have a radical side why won't the imams denounce it? I have heard this imam speak 3 different times now, and not once has he made this distinction. He seems to speak to all of Islam as being peaceful and hints around the idea that those who do evil are not apart of it, but never identifies these acts as being evil...
Is this why Obama and Clinton do not acknowledge 'radical Islam' because Muslims don't make this distinction?
Muslims make the True Muslim™ distinction. You're familiar, I assume?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
 (June 14, 2016 at 2:37 pm)Drich Wrote: If islam does have a radical side why won't the imams denounce it? They do. Regularly. It's just not splashed in the same fat headlines all over the front page. Who's fault is that, one might wonder. But if you look, there's always muslim officials distancing themselves from the attacks. Orlando isn't any different. The head of American muslims distanced himself. ![[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-d-3rfdI7nG0%2FTerwtFyFXoI%2FAAAAAAAACak%2F7kFSmHeVrng%2Fs320%2FBumper%2BSticker%2B-%2BAsheville%2B-%2BPraise%2BDog3.JPG)
(June 14, 2016 at 2:38 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Muslims make the True Muslim™ distinction. You're familiar, I assume? Again if this were true, then by not denouncing 'radical islam' what we consider moderate islamists themselves are not moderate. Because if 'moderate islam' represents 'the true islamic religion' then the 'evil radicals' are apostate/heretics for the lack of a better term. So by not identifying them as radicals or openly condemning their actions... Radical islam becomes apart of moderate islam. Do you get it? Maybe that is why obama and clinton will not make the radical islam distinction as it is not a distinction islam itself is willing to make. (June 14, 2016 at 4:19 pm)Drich Wrote: Again if this were true, then by not denouncing 'radical islam' what we consider moderate islamists themselves are not moderate. Maybe have an informed opinion before spewing bullshit? As I said above, they always distance themselves. After every given attack. You just have to look, since news like that aren't as juicy as the attacks themselves.
(June 14, 2016 at 3:12 pm)abaris Wrote:(June 14, 2016 at 2:37 pm)Drich Wrote: If islam does have a radical side why won't the imams denounce it? Again I have heard this central Fl imum speak on this subject several times and never once has he yet to identify this attack as a evil act perpetrated by a radical fanatic/s. He simply says Islam is a religion of peace, do not rush to judgement, has held the media and politicians responsible for death threat on social media, and carefully worded the response 'those who practice evil do not worship allah' with the implication on the evil acts, but does not out right identify the shooting or the shooter as having committed an evil act. my question is why? If someone like donald trump and hillary clinton can both agree on this being an evil act or even a terrorist act, then why is this man giving the impression that he is walking on egg shells? |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 20 Guest(s)
