(July 12, 2016 at 4:32 pm)Drich Wrote:

(July 12, 2016 at 1:53 pm)The_Empress Wrote: Oh, really? Selflessness? Millions of dollars and the possible "sacrifice" of his own life, leaving his sick kids behind so his wife can care for them on her own?

Wow is right.

Wow indeed... He would leave his wife with millions of dollars to support those kids with...

The self righteous hate and anger you have for a man and his wife electing to give up the life you would live, to live a less selfish one, won't even allow you to see that you answer your own indictment.

Again, Evil hate/loaths good.

Right. I'm selfish. That's why I've begun the process of becoming a certified volunteer for the Guardian ad Litem program here in FL, or why I'm a certified volunteer SART/DVRT advocate, and why I'd rather donate my extra money to those in need than buy myself a gold watch.

Please.

I used to argue with Christians, and I still do to some degree, but shitsticks like Drich are just too damn representative of the whole group of "apologists" for the endeavor to be worthwhile. They would sooner eat shit and call it an Ezekiel sandwich than admit that God was not justified in ordering genocide, allowing slavery and setting up the rape culture.

You know, for so many Christians that have an obvious death wish, it's amazing that more don't follow through with it. I wonder what they're afraid of...?

(July 12, 2016 at 5:21 pm)Nihilist Virus Wrote: but shitsticks like Drich are just too damn representative of the whole group of "apologists" for the endeavor to be worthwhile.

No, he isn't. Not according to my own experience. In fact I never encountered such a despicable little christian shit, with such a shitty version of christianity in real life. Takes some special persons to gobble up the bad parts of the bible as the only truth. Drich is special in that department. Might be different in America though.

(July 12, 2016 at 6:50 pm)abaris Wrote:

(July 12, 2016 at 5:21 pm)Nihilist Virus Wrote: but shitsticks like Drich are just too damn representative of the whole group of "apologists" for the endeavor to be worthwhile.

No, he isn't. Not according to my own experience. In fact I never encountered such a despicable little christian shit, with such a shitty version of christianity in real life. Takes some special persons to gobble up the bad parts of the bible as the only truth. Drich is special in that department. Might be different in America though.

I have over a thousand posts on christianforums.com, nearly all of which are in the apologetics forum. I have a couple posts and threads in other areas, most of which were because there was no apologetics forum at the time. So I've seen my share of crazy and I know what I'm talking about.

So let me tell you that aside from his use of profanity, Drich an accurate representation of them in terms of where he falls on the asshole spectrum and where he falls on the insanity spectrum. His apologetic gymnastics are exactly as I've seen everywhere. I think he engages in profanity here because he's allowed to, and because we use it at him. Profanity is, of course, not allowed at christianforums.com, so I think that most apologists would act like him if they came here and I think he would act like them there if he went there.

And if you have doubt, ye of little faith, let me tell you some of the batshit insane stuff I've heard from users who are definitely not sockpuppet accounts:


Nutjob #1:
Before the Tower of Babel, everyone spoke what we know as Olde English. The 1611 King James version was written in the original language of the patriarchs. This guy's slogan thing below his name is "SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE." It's in all caps.

Nutjob #2:
The contradictions in the Old Testament regarding kings (their ages and reigns) are not meaningful because there is no timeline (still doing WTF cartwheels on this one). This guy claims that at one point God picked him up and took him above the earth so he could see it like an astronaut.



I think there were some other classics but I can't think of them at the moment. And it goes without saying that most of them cannot follow chains of logic, because their "Whole armor of God" helmet thing together with their thick skulls just blocks all of it out.

(July 12, 2016 at 2:21 pm)Drich Wrote: Likewise The douche bag OP was highlighting what he thought evil of God/self sacrifice for Godly cause to be, by condemning what he saw as 'evil' (even if he would use a different name to label it.) In the act of adopting terminally ill children and seeing the feel loved before they die...

Yeah "great" plan: earn millions of dollars, adopt terminally ill kids and hire doctors and nurses to take care of them 24/7 while at the same time rail against stem cell research and science - the thing that can actually help millions terminally ill children across the world and not just temporally relieve their pain (probably not even that) in the luxury that only two kids of of few million have can make sense only to asshole christians like you.

(July 12, 2016 at 5:21 pm)Nihilist Virus Wrote: I used to argue with Christians, and I still do to some degree, but shitsticks like Drich are just too damn representative of the whole group of "apologists" for the endeavor to be worthwhile.  They would sooner eat shit and call it an Ezekiel sandwich than admit that God was not justified in ordering genocide, allowing slavery and setting up the rape culture.

nice.. customary default to stereotypes... shows limited comprehension when ever done, whether race is a component or not.

Apparently you are the only one who does not know that i do argue that genocide was the only answer when God ordered it, nor do I make apology for what God has ordered even if the modern western culture has rallied against.

quit trying to change the subject to something you think you can win and address the OP or start a new thread.

(July 12, 2016 at 7:18 pm)Nihilist Virus Wrote:

(July 12, 2016 at 6:50 pm)abaris Wrote: No, he isn't. Not according to my own experience. In fact I never encountered such a despicable little christian shit, with such a shitty version of christianity in real life. Takes some special persons to gobble up the bad parts of the bible as the only truth. Drich is special in that department. Might be different in America though.

I have over a thousand posts on christianforums.com, nearly all of which are in the apologetics forum.  I have a couple posts and threads in other areas, most of which were because there was no apologetics forum at the time.  So I've seen my share of crazy and I know what I'm talking about.

So let me tell you that aside from his use of profanity, Drich an accurate representation of them in terms of where he falls on the asshole spectrum and where he falls on the insanity spectrum.  His apologetic gymnastics are exactly as I've seen everywhere.  I think he engages in profanity here because he's allowed to, and because we use it at him.  Profanity is, of course, not allowed at christianforums.com, so I think that most apologists would act like him if they came here and I think he would act like them there if he went there.

And if you have doubt, ye of little faith, let me tell you some of the batshit insane stuff I've heard from users who are definitely not sockpuppet accounts:


Nutjob #1:
Before the Tower of Babel, everyone spoke what we know as Olde English.  The 1611 King James version was written in the original language of the patriarchs.  This guy's slogan thing below his name is "SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE."  It's in all caps.

Nutjob #2:
The contradictions in the Old Testament regarding kings (their ages and reigns) are not meaningful because there is no timeline (still doing WTF cartwheels on this one).  This guy claims that at one point God picked him up and took him above the earth so he could see it like an astronaut.



I think there were some other classics but I can't think of them at the moment.  And it goes without saying that most of them cannot follow chains of logic, because their "Whole armor of God" helmet thing together with their thick skulls just blocks all of it out.

and I an just a few hundred post shy of 6000 posts on Christian forums. com 90% of which are in the appologetics and what was known then as Atheist outreach sub forums. and I will acknowledge that there are some out right nut jobs... but for the most part, the people there are middle of the road. Lots do indeed have questions of aspects of their faith that they simply believe out of a duty to faith, and when cornered will give a stock answer. However in a deeper discussion many will listen. (just like here.. imagine that.)

And if you do take the time to look me up drich0150 you will see my use of hard curse words has been limited, but my harsh nature has not. (I speak to them as I speak here minus a hand full of hard curse words I've used here.) I am not one to try and fool myself or others about who I am at my core because I will or will not say certain words.

That said, even there my 'views' are not in line with the majority of the mainstream. I feel it is important to have dialog with people that would tend to feel more comfortable here at this site than at a highly restrictive Christian site. I feel no one should have to restrict themselves to ask any question. If it is of genuine concern the question should be asked.

(July 13, 2016 at 8:53 am)Drich Wrote:

(July 12, 2016 at 5:21 pm)Nihilist Virus Wrote: I used to argue with Christians, and I still do to some degree, but shitsticks like Drich are just too damn representative of the whole group of "apologists" for the endeavor to be worthwhile.  They would sooner eat shit and call it an Ezekiel sandwich than admit that God was not justified in ordering genocide, allowing slavery and setting up the rape culture.

nice.. customary default to stereotypes... shows limited comprehension when ever done, whether race is a component or not.

Apparently you are the only one who does not know that i do argue that genocide was the only answer when God ordered it, nor do I make apology for what God has ordered even if the modern western culture has rallied against.

quit trying to change the subject to something you think you can win and address the OP or start a new thread.

would sooner eat shit and call it an Ezekiel sandwich than admit that God was not justified in ordering genocide

i do argue that genocide was the only answer when God ordered it

Lol, nailed it.

quit trying to change the subject to something you think you can win and address the OP or start a new thread

Caweasel is out of his fucking mind, we've moved on bro.

Huh, didn't know that about Reese.