I also love comparing other people to drug addicts. That's how they know I care.
I don't believe you. Get over it.
hate the sin, love the sinner
|
I also love comparing other people to drug addicts. That's how they know I care.
I don't believe you. Get over it.
RE: hate the sin, love the sinner
September 4, 2016 at 4:17 pm
(This post was last modified: September 4, 2016 at 4:18 pm by Drich.)
(September 4, 2016 at 2:07 pm)Jesster Wrote:(September 4, 2016 at 2:05 pm)Drich Wrote: then why post? Youre trolling me??? I have broken you down to responding through memes.. People outside of highschool typically identify this as a sign of defeat. When one typically starts out with words and is reduced to memes it shows a broken intellect. Your thoughts/your efforts failed so an appeal to memes generally shows a desperate need to communicate emotion on a base level that you yourself can't seem to communicate adequately. (it is a literary way to lash out visually when your words fail you.) The fury and rage of willy wonka, to try and End what you perceive as an assault, then an effort to regain control by feigning detachment through a cartoon, followed be a care giver/compassion person telling me I do not matter All REEKS of someone trying to trigger an emotional response. I say all of that to say, yes in your little mind you maybe 'trolling me' but you have a long long way to go before you will see your desired response. Why? because I am where I want to be and I have you where I want you to be in this conversation. Get it all out. Then over the coming weeks continue to "troll me" by reading what I say to others and try and snipe comments. But know for that effort to be successful your going to have to read and respond to what it is I am actually saying, and not post crap on what you think my position should be. which is how you will finally be force fed some of what I am trying to tell you now. Understand what you are doing has already been done by just about everyone here, and while you may not be able to endure the sting of what I have to say long enough to read this far, the person I was having this same conversation with several weeks or months ago can, and it is to them I am speaking anyway... Maybe we can pick up this conversation in a couple of months when you find yourself, and regain your words..
I don't believe you. Get over it.
(September 4, 2016 at 3:57 pm)Drich Wrote:(September 4, 2016 at 2:47 pm)Cecelia Wrote: It's so interesting to me that often Christians lack the compassion to show what is true love. The idea of 'hate the sin, love the sinner' is one great example of that. They believe that they can sit and silently judge someone as a sinner, while still having love for them. This isn't love at all, of course. But they don't get that. Because their book has such a warped idea of what love is, that they have a warped idea of what love is. They wouldn't know what love was if it bit them in the ass. Using a bullshit word rooted in superstition like the word "sin" does not make a sky hero vs a ground villain battling over the neurons in your brain to make one an addict a real thing. It is absurd to think atheists are incapable of having the same reactions and emotions to the actions of others that a theist may have. What makes one an addict are chemical addictions, not super heros vs super villains.
I don't believe you. Get over it.
RE: hate the sin, love the sinner
September 4, 2016 at 7:03 pm
(This post was last modified: September 4, 2016 at 7:05 pm by Athene.)
(September 4, 2016 at 2:04 pm)Drich Wrote:(September 4, 2016 at 5:04 am)Thena323 Wrote: Yes, you did mention it was over a lifetime. Sorry about that. heh heh...frickin' noodles as in "Are you frickin' kiddin' me?" On weekends, several of the Filipina nurses bring it. Food. Lots of it. I was eating vegetable pancit : Very thin, thread-like, rice noodles that become soft just by soaking in warm water a couple of minutes. Then they get tossed in a pan with oil, garlic, shallots, vegetables and whatever else strikes one's fancy. Quote:She would start with the Ramen beef, and then put a table spoon of Korean ketchup (Gochijang) in them which would set "both holes on fire" (one now and one about 8 hours from now) Or she would put Cheong-guk-jang (or stinky bean paste) in it which litterally looks and smells like mashed up dog poo (hence Old doo's) Basically it is mashed up and firmented soybeans, left out in the sun in jars to bake for weeks. Looks and smells bad tastes so good! (which is why when they say smell is like 90% of taste I know its a lie.) This stuff tastes nothing like it smells. But it makes you smell like it smells. Well, I have tried a bit of Filipino bagoong; a "stinky" paste made from fermented fish or krill. It actually didn't taste nearly as potent as it smelled. Not bad, just a bit too salty for my liking. I do like very hot stuff, so the Korean ketchup sounds like something I would try; I'm not too keen on the prospect of delayed ass burning, though. I'd definitely use less than a tablespoon. (September 3, 2016 at 11:10 am)Drich Wrote:(September 2, 2016 at 2:59 pm)Jesster Wrote: And again it does not seem like you have read what I have written. Funny how that works. The difference is that you are going way off-topic to a point that I don't care about. I am selecting the parts that are on topic and sticking to them. Let's do that some more.HEY (not) Stupid If you Don't read anything else Read The Following! You know, we could make a television show out of this. Anybody up for funding a new series, "Drich says the stupidest shit"?
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home (September 2, 2016 at 5:17 pm)Jesster Wrote:(September 2, 2016 at 5:14 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: If you say so? It was a quick answer, because I was trying not to change subjects. The problem for materialist and many atheists, is in providing a foundation for their moral view. Even in moral pragmatism, one can very easily reason, to killing a group of people. It is going to be determined by your moral purpose and goal. When asking "why"; to a moral relativist, it very often comes back, to because "I said so". So we are left with who is saying so! Who decides the purpose and function that the morals are based on? I think that God, as creator has that right. Now in the case of sexual immortality, I do believe that it is harmful; and that it changes our views into something ugly and unhealthy. I know that I regret my sins in this area. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|