(October 15, 2016 at 8:29 pm)Minimalist Wrote: The Deplorables go Full Retard...or Full Batshit, take you pick.

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/10/trump-su...-election/

Quote:Trump supporters raise talk of armed revolt as he stokes their fears of a ‘rigged’ election

These people are fucking insane...but then I guess you have to be to support a fucking shithead like Drumpf.

An armed revolt of Trump supporters? Yes, folks, the revolution will be televised . . . but only for thirty minutes, in between reruns of "The Golden Girls" and "Murder, She Wrote". Once the Rascal scooters lose power, the one guy in the group who can read a map goes missing, and they run out of essential provisions and stores (primarily Ensure, Depends, and Duck Dynasty merchandise), the whole thing will be over, and they'll be reduced to raiding the nearest buffet.

What fearless patriots! What a principled stand!

What a collection of moronic pussies.

(October 17, 2016 at 1:35 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:

(October 15, 2016 at 8:29 pm)Minimalist Wrote: The Deplorables go Full Retard...or Full Batshit, take you pick.

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/10/trump-su...-election/


These people are fucking insane...but then I guess you have to be to support a fucking shithead like Drumpf.

An armed revolt of Trump supporters? Yes, folks, the revolution will be televised . . . but only for thirty minutes, in between reruns of "The Golden Girls" and "Murder, She Wrote". Once the Rascal scooters lose power, the one guy in the group who can read a map goes missing, and they run out of essential provisions and stores (primarily Ensure, Depends, and Duck Dynasty merchandise), the whole thing will be over, and they'll be reduced to raiding the nearest buffet.

What fearless patriots! What a principled stand!

What a collection of moronic pussies.

"Send skittles ... and dildoes."

Deplorablicans vow to not let Hillary nominate any SCOTUS justices either.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/201...r-share-di

I've already voted against McCain.   Senile old fucktard.

(October 17, 2016 at 3:11 pm)Divinity Wrote: Deplorablicans vow to not let Hillary nominate any SCOTUS justices either.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/201...r-share-di

Eight years, three more vacancies ... let the Republicans defend thatcourse of action in the elections. "The Republicans wish to gut the courts which dispense justice to the people."

Boy, a campaign manager could have a field day with that.

(October 17, 2016 at 1:01 pm)Divinity Wrote: Trump says he will unite all Americans 'under one god, saluting one American flag."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/nat...video.html

..And there are atheists who seriously support him? The fuck?

That makes no sense to me. Yes, let's go back to the crappy days but make them worse. Let's shoot ourselves in the foot for kicks. Honestly, I don't understand how the Christians who think they have the moral high ground would support this terd either, but I tend to not care or understand the majority of them anyway. He's a chaotic mess and bad for everyone in any given situation. This election is urgh.

I didn't know where to post this, so here will do.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-37701591

Quote:Vogue magazine has endorsed Hillary Clinton ahead of the US presidential election next month.

The Democratic candidate will face Republican rival Donald Trump when Americans go to the polls on 8 November.

In an editorial, the magazine said: "Vogue has no history of political endorsements.

"Given the profound stakes of this one, and the history that stands to be made, we feel that should change."

(October 17, 2016 at 3:43 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:

(October 17, 2016 at 3:11 pm)Divinity Wrote: Deplorablicans vow to not let Hillary nominate any SCOTUS justices either.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/201...r-share-di

...let the Republicans defend thatcourse of action in the elections. "The Republicans wish to gut the courts which dispense justice to the people."

What dispensing of justice? There'd be no justice with the radical brand of partisan leftist judges that she would nominate. The Republicans would be doing this nation a great service to block every one of corrupt Hillary's SCOTUS nominees.

(October 19, 2016 at 1:44 pm)A Theist Wrote:

(October 17, 2016 at 3:43 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: ...let the Republicans defend thatcourse of action in the elections. "The Republicans wish to gut the courts which dispense justice to the people."

What dispensing of justice? There'd be no justice with the radical brand of partisan leftist judges that she would nominate. The Republicans would be doing this nation a great service to block every one of corrupt Hillary's SCOTUS nominees.

Lol, she would nominate your favorite type: Business-friendly judges who think corporations are people. The fact that they don't wish to pry into a woman's womb or our bedrooms may bother you, but if Republicans wish to cut off their own noses to spite their faces, arguments such as the one you quoted are what they should -- and will -- face.

If you'd rather destroy functioning government than do your job as a Senator, perhaps you should find another job. For all their alleged fealty to a strict-constructionist reading of the Constitution, not one conservative can point to a clause in the Constitution which allows the Senate to refuse to carry out its duty to review judgeships. They are mandated to do this.

Functioning courts are vital, whether we like their decisions or not. Selecting judges on partisan grounds is a good recipe for assuring injustice.

If you're fine with that, I don't know what else to say.

Adolf wants Drumpf to appoint all those poor nazi judges that were convicted at Nuremberg.  Das ist justice, ja Adolf?

Luckily, they're all dead.